Smart Justice

Featured

Mississippi
Mar 2017
Dockery v. Hall

Smart Justice

Prisoners' Rights

Dockery v. Hall

The ACLU, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the Law Offices of Elizabeth Alexander, and the law firm of Covington & Burling LLP, filed a petition for class certification and expert reports for a federal lawsuit on behalf of prisoners at the East Mississippi Correctional Facility (EMCF). The lawsuit, which was filed in May 2013, describes the for-profit prison as hyper-violent, grotesquely filthy and dangerous. EMCF is operated in a perpetual state of crisis where prisoners are at grave risk of death and loss of limbs. The facility, located in Meridian, Mississippi, is supposed to provide intensive treatment to the state's prisoners with serious psychiatric disabilities, many of whom are locked down in long-term solitary confinement.
Dockery V. Hall. Explore Case.

All Cases

190 Smart Justice Cases

Roper v. Simmons
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2005

Smart Justice

Capital Punishment

Roper v. Simmons

Challenging the constitutionality of the juvenile death penalty. DECIDED
Explore case
Roper V. Simmons. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2005
Roper v. Simmons

Smart Justice

Capital Punishment

Roper v. Simmons

Challenging the constitutionality of the juvenile death penalty. DECIDED
Roper V. Simmons. Explore Case.
Garrison S. Johnson v. California
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2005

Smart Justice

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Garrison S. Johnson v. California

Reviewing whether California's policy of racially segregating all new prisoners should be subject to strict judicial scrutiny. DECIDED
Explore case
Garrison S. Johnson V. California. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2005
Garrison S. Johnson v. California

Smart Justice

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Garrison S. Johnson v. California

Reviewing whether California's policy of racially segregating all new prisoners should be subject to strict judicial scrutiny. DECIDED
Garrison S. Johnson V. California. Explore Case.
Jay V. Johnson v. California
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2005

Smart Justice

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Jay V. Johnson v. California

Reviewing the procedure by which a defendant can establish that the prosecution improperly used its peremptory jury challenges in a racially discriminatory fashion. DECIDED
Explore case
Jay V. Johnson V. California. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2005
Jay V. Johnson v. California

Smart Justice

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Jay V. Johnson v. California

Reviewing the procedure by which a defendant can establish that the prosecution improperly used its peremptory jury challenges in a racially discriminatory fashion. DECIDED
Jay V. Johnson V. California. Explore Case.
Benitez v. Mata
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2005

Smart Justice

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Benitez v. Mata

Reviewing the government's claim that "Mariel" Cubans can be subject to indefinite detention if they have been found excludable from the United States and Cuba will not allow their return. DECIDED
Explore case
Benitez V. Mata. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2005
Benitez v. Mata

Smart Justice

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Benitez v. Mata

Reviewing the government's claim that "Mariel" Cubans can be subject to indefinite detention if they have been found excludable from the United States and Cuba will not allow their return. DECIDED
Benitez V. Mata. Explore Case.
Muehler v. Mena
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2004

Smart Justice

Immigrants' Rights

Muehler v. Mena

Challenging the length, nature, and scope of the police detention of a lawful permanent resident during a police raid. 
Explore case
Muehler V. Mena. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2004
Muehler v. Mena

Smart Justice

Immigrants' Rights

Muehler v. Mena

Challenging the length, nature, and scope of the police detention of a lawful permanent resident during a police raid. 
Muehler V. Mena. Explore Case.