Supreme Court Term 2025-2026

We鈥檙e breaking down the cases we've asked the court to consider this term.

All Cases

574 Supreme Court Cases

Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2018

Voting Rights

Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute

The 桃子视频 and partner organizations filed a lawsuit challenging Ohio鈥檚 practice of 鈥榩urging鈥 or removing people who vote infrequently from its voting rolls, charging that it is in violation of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA).
Explore case
Husted V. A. Philip Randolph Institute. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2018
Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute

Voting Rights

Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute

The 桃子视频 and partner organizations filed a lawsuit challenging Ohio鈥檚 practice of 鈥榩urging鈥 or removing people who vote infrequently from its voting rolls, charging that it is in violation of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA).
Husted V. A. Philip Randolph Institute. Explore Case.
David Mullins and Charlie Craig
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2018

LGBTQ Rights

Religious Liberty

Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission

Whether a business open to the public has a constitutional right to discriminate.
Explore case
Masterpiece Cakeshop V. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2018
David Mullins and Charlie Craig

LGBTQ Rights

Religious Liberty

Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission

Whether a business open to the public has a constitutional right to discriminate.
Masterpiece Cakeshop V. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. Explore Case.
Gundy v. United States
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2018

Criminal Law Reform

Gundy v. United States

Whether it violates the separation of powers for Congress to delegate to the Attorney General, the nation鈥檚 chief prosecutor, the unfettered authority both to decide whether a criminal law should apply and to prosecute violators of that law.
Explore case
Gundy V. United States. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2018
Gundy v. United States

Criminal Law Reform

Gundy v. United States

Whether it violates the separation of powers for Congress to delegate to the Attorney General, the nation鈥檚 chief prosecutor, the unfettered authority both to decide whether a criminal law should apply and to prosecute violators of that law.
Gundy V. United States. Explore Case.
Hester v. Gentry
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2018

Criminal Law Reform

Smart Justice

Hester v. Gentry

In Alabama鈥檚 criminal justice system, wealth can be synonymous with freedom, and lack of wealth can mean incarceration. That鈥檚 wealth-based justice, and it鈥檚 unconstitutional. Hundreds of defendants, including Bradley Hester, Ray Charles Schultz, and Randall Parris, are routinely jailed pretrial due to their inability to afford a predetermined bail bond required for release. This system disregards the ramifications of unconstitutional pretrial detention for individuals and families, which include presumption of innocence, economic and emotional hardship, and potential loss of one鈥檚 job. We along with partners intervened in a federal class action lawsuit which seeks to end this unlawful detention scheme, and calls on Cullman County to instead implement fair, efficient, alternative conditions of release that are not based on how much money someone has.
Explore case
Hester V. Gentry. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2018
Hester v. Gentry

Criminal Law Reform

Smart Justice

Hester v. Gentry

In Alabama鈥檚 criminal justice system, wealth can be synonymous with freedom, and lack of wealth can mean incarceration. That鈥檚 wealth-based justice, and it鈥檚 unconstitutional. Hundreds of defendants, including Bradley Hester, Ray Charles Schultz, and Randall Parris, are routinely jailed pretrial due to their inability to afford a predetermined bail bond required for release. This system disregards the ramifications of unconstitutional pretrial detention for individuals and families, which include presumption of innocence, economic and emotional hardship, and potential loss of one鈥檚 job. We along with partners intervened in a federal class action lawsuit which seeks to end this unlawful detention scheme, and calls on Cullman County to instead implement fair, efficient, alternative conditions of release that are not based on how much money someone has.
Hester V. Gentry. Explore Case.
Jennings v. Rodriguez
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2018

Immigrants' Rights

Jennings v. Rodriguez

Whether it violates the Constitution and the immigration laws to subject immigrants in deportation proceedings to long-term detention without individualized bond hearings.
Explore case
Jennings V. Rodriguez. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2018
Jennings v. Rodriguez

Immigrants' Rights

Jennings v. Rodriguez

Whether it violates the Constitution and the immigration laws to subject immigrants in deportation proceedings to long-term detention without individualized bond hearings.
Jennings V. Rodriguez. Explore Case.
3334
35
3637...

How Do Terms Work?

Between October and late June or early July the Supreme Court is 鈥渋n session,鈥 meaning it hears oral arguments, issues written decisions, and decides whether to take additional cases.

Submitting petitions

Our legal team at the 桃子视频files a cert petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, a type of petition that usually argues that a lower court has incorrectly decided an important question of law that violates civil rights and should be fixed to prevent similar confusion in similar cases.

term starts

U.S. Supreme Court decides to take a case

On average, the Court considers about 7,000 鈥 8,000 petitions each term and accepts about 80 for oral argument.

Oral arguments

This is the period where the U.S. Supreme Court listens to our case in court.

U.S. Supreme Court makes final decisions

While the U.S. Supreme Court makes decisions throughout the term, many are released right before the term ends. If a decision doesn't go in our favor, we fight back!