Voting Rights

Featured

Mississippi
Dec 2025
Mississippi

Voting Rights

White v. Mississippi State Board of Elections

District lines used to elect Mississippi’s Supreme Court have gone unchanged for more than 35 years. We’re suing because the current lines crack the Mississippi Delta and dilute the voting strength of Black Mississippians in state Supreme Court elections, in violation of the Voting Rights Act.
White V. Mississippi State Board Of Elections. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2025
Alabama on a map of the United States of America

Voting Rights

Racial Justice

Allen v. Milligan

Whether Alabama’s congressional districts violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act because they discriminate against Black voters. We succeeded in winning a new map for 2024 elections which, for the first time, has two congressional district that provide Black voters a fair opportunity to elect candidates of their choosing despite multiple attempts by Alabama to stop us at the Supreme Court. Despite this win, Alabama is still defending its discriminatory map, and a trial was held in February 2025 to determine the map for the rest of the decade. In May 2025, a federal court ruled that Alabama's 2023 congressional map both violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and was enacted by the Alabama Legislature with racially discriminatory intent.
Allen V. Milligan. Explore Case.
Washington, D.C.
Oct 2025
trump

Voting Rights

League of Women Voters Education Fund v. Trump

On March 25, 2025, in a sweeping and unprecedented Executive Order, President Trump attempted to usurp the power to regulate federal elections from Congress and the States. Among other things, the Executive Order directs the Election Assistance Commission—an agency that Congress specifically established to be bipartisan and independent—to require voters to show a passport or other citizenship documentation in order to register to vote in federal elections. If implemented, the Executive Order would threaten the ability of millions of eligible Americans to register and vote and upend the administration of federal elections. On behalf of leading voter registration organizations and advocacy organizations, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµand co-counsel filed a lawsuit to block the Executive Order as an unconstitutional power grab.
League Of Women Voters Education Fund V. Trump. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Oct 2025
Mississippi

Voting Rights

State Board of Election Commissioners v. Mississippi State Conference of the NAACP

Mississippi has a growing Black population, which is already the largest Black population percentage of any state in the country. Yet. Black Mississippians continue to be significantly under-represented in the state legislature, as Mississippi’s latest districting maps fail to reflect the reality of the state’s changing demographics. During the 2022 redistricting process, the Mississippi legislature refused to create any new districts where Black voters have a chance to elect their preferred representative. The current district lines therefore dilute the voting power of Black Mississippians and continue to deprive them of political representation that is responsive to their needs and concerns, including severe disparities in education and healthcare.
State Board Of Election Commissioners V. Mississippi State Conference Of The Naacp. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Oct 2025
Louisiana

Voting Rights

Louisiana v. Callais (Callais v. Landry)

Whether the congressional map Louisiana adopted to cure a Voting Rights Act violation in Robinson v. Ardoin is itself unlawful as a gerrymander.
Louisiana V. Callais (callais V. Landry). Explore Case.
Missouri
Sep 2025
A close up of an "I Voted" sticker.

Voting Rights

Wise v. Missouri

In unprecedented fashion, the State of Missouri has redrawn the district lines used for electing members of Congress for a second time this decade. These new district lines are gerrymandered and will harm political representation for all Missourians, particularly Black residents in Kansas City, who have been divided along racial lines.
Wise V. Missouri. Explore Case.

All Cases

190 Voting Rights Cases

Crawford v. Marion County Election Board
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2012

Voting Rights

Crawford v. Marion County Election Board

Whether Indiana's voter ID law unconstitutionally burdens the right to vote absent any evidence of voter fraud. DECIDED
Explore case
Crawford V. Marion County Election Board. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2012
Crawford v. Marion County Election Board

Voting Rights

Crawford v. Marion County Election Board

Whether Indiana's voter ID law unconstitutionally burdens the right to vote absent any evidence of voter fraud. DECIDED
Crawford V. Marion County Election Board. Explore Case.
Common Cause v. Billups
Georgia
Aug 2012

Voting Rights

Common Cause v. Billups

In 2005, the Georgia legislature passed a law requiring voters to show photo ID before voting at the polls on Election Day. The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµVoting Rights Project and the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Georgia joined two individual voters and five other non-profit organizations in a lawsuit challenging the law under the 24th Amendment, Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Equal Protection Clause, and the state constitution.
Explore case
Common Cause V. Billups. Explore Case.
Georgia
Aug 2012
Common Cause v. Billups

Voting Rights

Common Cause v. Billups

In 2005, the Georgia legislature passed a law requiring voters to show photo ID before voting at the polls on Election Day. The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµVoting Rights Project and the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Georgia joined two individual voters and five other non-profit organizations in a lawsuit challenging the law under the 24th Amendment, Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Equal Protection Clause, and the state constitution.
Common Cause V. Billups. Explore Case.
Voting
South Dakota
May 2010

Voting Rights

Racial Justice

Janis v. Nelson

Explore case
Janis V. Nelson. Explore Case.
South Dakota
May 2010
Voting

Voting Rights

Racial Justice

Janis v. Nelson

Janis V. Nelson. Explore Case.
Request for Hearing on U.S. Felon Disfranchisement Laws to the IACHR
Court Case
May 2010

Voting Rights

+3 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Request for Hearing on U.S. Felon Disfranchisement Laws to the IACHR

The felony disfranchisement laws, policies and practices of the United States violate the right to vote free from discrimination under the American Declaration on the Rights and Duties of Man and the Inter-American Convention on Human Rights.
Explore case
Request For Hearing On U.s. Felon Disfranchisement Laws To The Iachr. Explore Case.
Court Case
May 2010
Request for Hearing on U.S. Felon Disfranchisement Laws to the IACHR

Voting Rights

+3 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Request for Hearing on U.S. Felon Disfranchisement Laws to the IACHR

The felony disfranchisement laws, policies and practices of the United States violate the right to vote free from discrimination under the American Declaration on the Rights and Duties of Man and the Inter-American Convention on Human Rights.
Request For Hearing On U.s. Felon Disfranchisement Laws To The Iachr. Explore Case.
South Carolina Green Party et al. v. South Carolina State Election Commission et al.
South Carolina
May 2010

Voting Rights

South Carolina Green Party et al. v. South Carolina State Election Commission et al.

Explore case
South Carolina Green Party Et Al. V. South Carolina State Election Commission Et Al.. Explore Case.
South Carolina
May 2010
South Carolina Green Party et al. v. South Carolina State Election Commission et al.

Voting Rights

South Carolina Green Party et al. v. South Carolina State Election Commission et al.

South Carolina Green Party Et Al. V. South Carolina State Election Commission Et Al.. Explore Case.
3334
35
3637...