Voting Rights

Featured

Mississippi
Dec 2025
Mississippi

Voting Rights

White v. Mississippi State Board of Elections

District lines used to elect Mississippi’s Supreme Court have gone unchanged for more than 35 years. We’re suing because the current lines crack the Mississippi Delta and dilute the voting strength of Black Mississippians in state Supreme Court elections, in violation of the Voting Rights Act.
White V. Mississippi State Board Of Elections. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2025
Alabama on a map of the United States of America

Voting Rights

Racial Justice

Allen v. Milligan

Whether Alabama’s congressional districts violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act because they discriminate against Black voters. We succeeded in winning a new map for 2024 elections which, for the first time, has two congressional district that provide Black voters a fair opportunity to elect candidates of their choosing despite multiple attempts by Alabama to stop us at the Supreme Court. Despite this win, Alabama is still defending its discriminatory map, and a trial was held in February 2025 to determine the map for the rest of the decade. In May 2025, a federal court ruled that Alabama's 2023 congressional map both violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and was enacted by the Alabama Legislature with racially discriminatory intent.
Allen V. Milligan. Explore Case.
Washington, D.C.
Oct 2025
trump

Voting Rights

League of Women Voters Education Fund v. Trump

On March 25, 2025, in a sweeping and unprecedented Executive Order, President Trump attempted to usurp the power to regulate federal elections from Congress and the States. Among other things, the Executive Order directs the Election Assistance Commission—an agency that Congress specifically established to be bipartisan and independent—to require voters to show a passport or other citizenship documentation in order to register to vote in federal elections. If implemented, the Executive Order would threaten the ability of millions of eligible Americans to register and vote and upend the administration of federal elections. On behalf of leading voter registration organizations and advocacy organizations, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµand co-counsel filed a lawsuit to block the Executive Order as an unconstitutional power grab.
League Of Women Voters Education Fund V. Trump. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Oct 2025
Mississippi

Voting Rights

State Board of Election Commissioners v. Mississippi State Conference of the NAACP

Mississippi has a growing Black population, which is already the largest Black population percentage of any state in the country. Yet. Black Mississippians continue to be significantly under-represented in the state legislature, as Mississippi’s latest districting maps fail to reflect the reality of the state’s changing demographics. During the 2022 redistricting process, the Mississippi legislature refused to create any new districts where Black voters have a chance to elect their preferred representative. The current district lines therefore dilute the voting power of Black Mississippians and continue to deprive them of political representation that is responsive to their needs and concerns, including severe disparities in education and healthcare.
State Board Of Election Commissioners V. Mississippi State Conference Of The Naacp. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Oct 2025
Louisiana

Voting Rights

Louisiana v. Callais (Callais v. Landry)

Whether the congressional map Louisiana adopted to cure a Voting Rights Act violation in Robinson v. Ardoin is itself unlawful as a gerrymander.
Louisiana V. Callais (callais V. Landry). Explore Case.
Missouri
Sep 2025
A close up of an "I Voted" sticker.

Voting Rights

Wise v. Missouri

In unprecedented fashion, the State of Missouri has redrawn the district lines used for electing members of Congress for a second time this decade. These new district lines are gerrymandered and will harm political representation for all Missourians, particularly Black residents in Kansas City, who have been divided along racial lines.
Wise V. Missouri. Explore Case.

All Cases

190 Voting Rights Cases

Black Lives Matter protest
Court Case
Sep 2017

Voting Rights

Voting Rights Trial in Ferguson

On December 18, 2014, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµfiled a federal lawsuit challenging the Ferguson-Florissant School District’s at-large electoral system used to elect school board members.
Explore case
Voting Rights Trial In Ferguson. Explore Case.
Court Case
Sep 2017
Black Lives Matter protest

Voting Rights

Voting Rights Trial in Ferguson

On December 18, 2014, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµfiled a federal lawsuit challenging the Ferguson-Florissant School District’s at-large electoral system used to elect school board members.
Voting Rights Trial In Ferguson. Explore Case.
Gill v. Whitford
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2017

Voting Rights

Gill v. Whitford

Whether partisan gerrymandering that entrenches a legislative majority violates the First Amendment.
Explore case
Gill V. Whitford. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2017
Gill v. Whitford

Voting Rights

Gill v. Whitford

Whether partisan gerrymandering that entrenches a legislative majority violates the First Amendment.
Gill V. Whitford. Explore Case.
La Follette v. Padilla
California
Aug 2017

Voting Rights

La Follette v. Padilla

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµis suing California for invalidating the vote-by-mail ballots of tens of thousands of voters without warning. At issue is a state law that allows election officials — who have no handwriting-analysis expertise — to reject a vote-by-mail ballot without giving notice to the voter, if they think the signature on the ballot envelope does not match the one they have in the voter’s registration file. Nothing in the law tells voters they have to sign their ballot envelopes in any particular way; and voters are not informed that their ballots have been thrown out.
Explore case
La Follette V. Padilla. Explore Case.
California
Aug 2017
La Follette v. Padilla

Voting Rights

La Follette v. Padilla

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµis suing California for invalidating the vote-by-mail ballots of tens of thousands of voters without warning. At issue is a state law that allows election officials — who have no handwriting-analysis expertise — to reject a vote-by-mail ballot without giving notice to the voter, if they think the signature on the ballot envelope does not match the one they have in the voter’s registration file. Nothing in the law tells voters they have to sign their ballot envelopes in any particular way; and voters are not informed that their ballots have been thrown out.
La Follette V. Padilla. Explore Case.
Chelsea Collaborative v. Galvin
Massachusetts
Jul 2017

Voting Rights

Chelsea Collaborative v. Galvin

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Massachussetts, and others filed a lawsuit in Massachussetts challenging the state’s requirement that eligible voters register 20 days before an election. The arbitrary deadline interferes with the fundamental right to vote and unnecessarily disenfranchises voters.
Explore case
Chelsea Collaborative V. Galvin. Explore Case.
Massachusetts
Jul 2017
Chelsea Collaborative v. Galvin

Voting Rights

Chelsea Collaborative v. Galvin

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Massachussetts, and others filed a lawsuit in Massachussetts challenging the state’s requirement that eligible voters register 20 days before an election. The arbitrary deadline interferes with the fundamental right to vote and unnecessarily disenfranchises voters.
Chelsea Collaborative V. Galvin. Explore Case.
ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ v. Donald Trump
Court Case
Jul 2017

Voting Rights

ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ v. Donald Trump

On July 10, 2017, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ filed a federal lawsuit over the lack of transparency by President Trump’s election commission.
Explore case
ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ V. Donald Trump. Explore Case.
Court Case
Jul 2017
ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ v. Donald Trump

Voting Rights

ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ v. Donald Trump

On July 10, 2017, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ filed a federal lawsuit over the lack of transparency by President Trump’s election commission.
ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ V. Donald Trump. Explore Case.
2930
31
3233...