Free Speech

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2023
Molina v. Book

Free Speech

Molina v. Book

Whether police officers violated clearly established First Amendment rights when they tear-gassed plaintiffs for serving as legal observers in a public protest.
Molina V. Book. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2023
O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier and Lindke v. Freed

Free Speech

O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier and Lindke v. Freed

The ACLU, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Northern California, and the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Southern California filed amicus briefs in support of everyday people fighting for government transparency and accountability in two cases set for review by the U.S. Supreme Court this Term: O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier and Lindke v. Freed.
O’connor-ratcliff V. Garnier And Lindke V. Freed. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2021
Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.

Free Speech

Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.

On September 25, 2017, the ACLU-PA filed suit on behalf of B.L., a high school sophomore who has been cheerleading since she was in fifth grade and was expelled from the team as punishment for out-of-school speech.
Mahanoy Area School District V. B.l.. Explore Case.

All Cases

158 Free Speech Cases

FCC v. Brand X Internet Services
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2005

Free Speech

FCC v. Brand X Internet Services

Reviewing whether cable broadband services should be allowed to limit access to a single Internet Service Provider (ISP). DECIDED
Explore case
Fcc V. Brand X Internet Services. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2005
FCC v. Brand X Internet Services

Free Speech

FCC v. Brand X Internet Services

Reviewing whether cable broadband services should be allowed to limit access to a single Internet Service Provider (ISP). DECIDED
Fcc V. Brand X Internet Services. Explore Case.
MGM Studios v. Grokster
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2005

Free Speech

MGM Studios v. Grokster

Reviewing whether the developers of software that allows for peer-to-peer file sharing can be held liable if that software is used by some consumers for copyright infringement when it is also capable of substantial non-infringing uses. DECIDED
Explore case
Mgm Studios V. Grokster. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2005
MGM Studios v. Grokster

Free Speech

MGM Studios v. Grokster

Reviewing whether the developers of software that allows for peer-to-peer file sharing can be held liable if that software is used by some consumers for copyright infringement when it is also capable of substantial non-infringing uses. DECIDED
Mgm Studios V. Grokster. Explore Case.
Ashcroft v. ACLU
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2004

Free Speech

Ashcroft v. ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Reviewing whether an Internet censorship law that attempts to safeguard children against sexually explicit material online unconstitutionally blocks lawful and valuable speech for adults. DECIDED
Explore case
Ashcroft V. Aclu. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2004
Ashcroft v. ACLU

Free Speech

Ashcroft v. ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Reviewing whether an Internet censorship law that attempts to safeguard children against sexually explicit material online unconstitutionally blocks lawful and valuable speech for adults. DECIDED
Ashcroft V. Aclu. Explore Case.
McConnell v. FEC
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2003

Free Speech

McConnell v. FEC

Reviewing campaign finance law. DECIDED
Explore case
Mcconnell V. Fec. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2003
McConnell v. FEC

Free Speech

McConnell v. FEC

Reviewing campaign finance law. DECIDED
Mcconnell V. Fec. Explore Case.
Vieth v. Jubelirer
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2003

Free Speech

Vieth v. Jubelirer

Explore case
Vieth V. Jubelirer. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2003
Vieth v. Jubelirer

Free Speech

Vieth v. Jubelirer

Vieth V. Jubelirer. Explore Case.
2930
31
32