Criminal Law Reform

Featured

Arizona
Oct 2023
Fund for Empowerment v. Phoenix, City of

Criminal Law Reform

Racial Justice

Fund for Empowerment v. Phoenix, City of

Fund for Empowerment is a challenge to the City of Phoenix’s practice of conducting sweeps of encampments without notice, issuing citations to unsheltered people for camping and sleeping on public property when they have no place else to go, and confiscating and destroying their property without notice or process.
Fund For Empowerment V. Phoenix, City Of. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2023
McElrath v. Georgia

Criminal Law Reform

McElrath v. Georgia

Does the Double Jeopardy Clause bar an appellate court from reviewing and setting aside a jury’s verdicts of acquittal on the ground that the verdict is inconsistent with the jury’s verdict on other charges?
Mcelrath V. Georgia. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2023
Pulsifer v. United States

Criminal Law Reform

Pulsifer v. United States

This case involves the interpretation of a federal law that allows defendants to avoid mandatory minimum sentences for certain nonviolent drug crimes, allowing judges to impose sentences tailored to their individual circumstances.
Pulsifer V. United States. Explore Case.
Texas
Jul 2021
Sanchez et al v. Dallas County Sheriff et al

Criminal Law Reform

Prisoners' Rights

Sanchez et al v. Dallas County Sheriff et al

Decarceration has always been an emergency, a life and death proposition, but COVID-19 makes this effort intensely urgent. The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµhas been working with our partners to litigate for the rights of those who are incarcerated and cannot protect themselves because of the policies of the institutions in which they are jailed.
Sanchez Et Al V. Dallas County Sheriff Et Al. Explore Case.

All Cases

157 Criminal Law Reform Cases

Scott v. Harris
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2007

Criminal Law Reform

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Scott v. Harris

Reviewing whether, and under what circumstances, a law enforcement may claim qualified immunity from damages after ramming the plaintiff's car during a high speed chase that left the plaintiff severely crippled. DECIDED
Explore case
Scott V. Harris. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2007
Scott v. Harris

Criminal Law Reform

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Scott v. Harris

Reviewing whether, and under what circumstances, a law enforcement may claim qualified immunity from damages after ramming the plaintiff's car during a high speed chase that left the plaintiff severely crippled. DECIDED
Scott V. Harris. Explore Case.
J.P. v. Taft
Ohio
Mar 2006

Criminal Law Reform

+4 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

J.P. v. Taft

Protecting incarcerated juveniles' access to the courts in Ohio.
Explore case
J.p. V. Taft. Explore Case.
Ohio
Mar 2006
J.P. v. Taft

Criminal Law Reform

+4 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

J.P. v. Taft

Protecting incarcerated juveniles' access to the courts in Ohio.
J.p. V. Taft. Explore Case.
Hudson v. Michigan
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2006

Criminal Law Reform

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Hudson v. Michigan

Reviewing whether the exclusionary rule applies to evidence seized following a violation of the "knock-and-announce" rule. DECIDED
Explore case
Hudson V. Michigan. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2006
Hudson v. Michigan

Criminal Law Reform

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Hudson v. Michigan

Reviewing whether the exclusionary rule applies to evidence seized following a violation of the "knock-and-announce" rule. DECIDED
Hudson V. Michigan. Explore Case.
Samson v. California
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2005

Criminal Law Reform

Smart Justice

Samson v. California

This case reviews whether the Fourth Amendment permits a police officer to search a parolee on the public streets without any basis for suspicion. DECIDED
Explore case
Samson V. California. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2005
Samson v. California

Criminal Law Reform

Smart Justice

Samson v. California

This case reviews whether the Fourth Amendment permits a police officer to search a parolee on the public streets without any basis for suspicion. DECIDED
Samson V. California. Explore Case.
Illinois v. Caballes
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2004

Criminal Law Reform

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Illinois v. Caballes

Reviewing whether police can expand a routine traffic stop into a drug investigation by using a drug-sniffing dog in the absence of individualized suspicion. DECIDED
Explore case
Illinois V. Caballes. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2004
Illinois v. Caballes

Criminal Law Reform

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Illinois v. Caballes

Reviewing whether police can expand a routine traffic stop into a drug investigation by using a drug-sniffing dog in the absence of individualized suspicion. DECIDED
Illinois V. Caballes. Explore Case.
2930
31
32