Voting Rights

Featured

Mississippi
Dec 2025
Mississippi

Voting Rights

White v. Mississippi State Board of Elections

District lines used to elect Mississippi’s Supreme Court have gone unchanged for more than 35 years. We’re suing because the current lines crack the Mississippi Delta and dilute the voting strength of Black Mississippians in state Supreme Court elections, in violation of the Voting Rights Act.
White V. Mississippi State Board Of Elections. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2025
Alabama on a map of the United States of America

Voting Rights

Racial Justice

Allen v. Milligan

Whether Alabama’s congressional districts violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act because they discriminate against Black voters. We succeeded in winning a new map for 2024 elections which, for the first time, has two congressional district that provide Black voters a fair opportunity to elect candidates of their choosing despite multiple attempts by Alabama to stop us at the Supreme Court. Despite this win, Alabama is still defending its discriminatory map, and a trial was held in February 2025 to determine the map for the rest of the decade. In May 2025, a federal court ruled that Alabama's 2023 congressional map both violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and was enacted by the Alabama Legislature with racially discriminatory intent.
Allen V. Milligan. Explore Case.
Washington, D.C.
Oct 2025
trump

Voting Rights

League of Women Voters Education Fund v. Trump

On March 25, 2025, in a sweeping and unprecedented Executive Order, President Trump attempted to usurp the power to regulate federal elections from Congress and the States. Among other things, the Executive Order directs the Election Assistance Commission—an agency that Congress specifically established to be bipartisan and independent—to require voters to show a passport or other citizenship documentation in order to register to vote in federal elections. If implemented, the Executive Order would threaten the ability of millions of eligible Americans to register and vote and upend the administration of federal elections. On behalf of leading voter registration organizations and advocacy organizations, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµand co-counsel filed a lawsuit to block the Executive Order as an unconstitutional power grab.
League Of Women Voters Education Fund V. Trump. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Oct 2025
Mississippi

Voting Rights

State Board of Election Commissioners v. Mississippi State Conference of the NAACP

Mississippi has a growing Black population, which is already the largest Black population percentage of any state in the country. Yet. Black Mississippians continue to be significantly under-represented in the state legislature, as Mississippi’s latest districting maps fail to reflect the reality of the state’s changing demographics. During the 2022 redistricting process, the Mississippi legislature refused to create any new districts where Black voters have a chance to elect their preferred representative. The current district lines therefore dilute the voting power of Black Mississippians and continue to deprive them of political representation that is responsive to their needs and concerns, including severe disparities in education and healthcare.
State Board Of Election Commissioners V. Mississippi State Conference Of The Naacp. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Oct 2025
Louisiana

Voting Rights

Louisiana v. Callais (Callais v. Landry)

Whether the congressional map Louisiana adopted to cure a Voting Rights Act violation in Robinson v. Ardoin is itself unlawful as a gerrymander.
Louisiana V. Callais (callais V. Landry). Explore Case.
Missouri
Sep 2025
A close up of an "I Voted" sticker.

Voting Rights

Wise v. Missouri

In unprecedented fashion, the State of Missouri has redrawn the district lines used for electing members of Congress for a second time this decade. These new district lines are gerrymandered and will harm political representation for all Missourians, particularly Black residents in Kansas City, who have been divided along racial lines.
Wise V. Missouri. Explore Case.

All Cases

190 Voting Rights Cases

Demonstrators hold signs, one of which says “End Voter Suppression Now.â€
Missouri
Oct 2018

Voting Rights

Missouri NAACP v. Missouri

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµand Advancement Project are suing Missouri over its new voter ID law, charging it fails to provide mandated funding for voter education, free voter IDs and birth certificates, and training of poll workers.
Explore case
Missouri Naacp V. Missouri. Explore Case.
Missouri
Oct 2018
Demonstrators hold signs, one of which says “End Voter Suppression Now.â€

Voting Rights

Missouri NAACP v. Missouri

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµand Advancement Project are suing Missouri over its new voter ID law, charging it fails to provide mandated funding for voter education, free voter IDs and birth certificates, and training of poll workers.
Missouri Naacp V. Missouri. Explore Case.
An absentee ballot.
Georgia
Oct 2018

Voting Rights

Georgia Muslim Voter Project v. Kemp

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ and ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Georgia filed a lawsuit against Secretary of State Brian Kemp and all county registrars demanding they provide due process for Georgia voters whose absentee ballots or applications are being rejected due to an alleged mismatch of signatures.
Explore case
Georgia Muslim Voter Project V. Kemp. Explore Case.
Georgia
Oct 2018
An absentee ballot.

Voting Rights

Georgia Muslim Voter Project v. Kemp

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ and ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Georgia filed a lawsuit against Secretary of State Brian Kemp and all county registrars demanding they provide due process for Georgia voters whose absentee ballots or applications are being rejected due to an alleged mismatch of signatures.
Georgia Muslim Voter Project V. Kemp. Explore Case.
League of Women Voters of Arizona v. Reagan
Court Case
Aug 2018

Voting Rights

League of Women Voters of Arizona v. Reagan

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ, The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Arizona, Demos, the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, and the law firm Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner filed a federal lawsuit against Arizona Secretary of State Michele Reagan for her office’s violations of the National Voter Registration Act.
Explore case
League Of Women Voters Of Arizona V. Reagan. Explore Case.
Court Case
Aug 2018
League of Women Voters of Arizona v. Reagan

Voting Rights

League of Women Voters of Arizona v. Reagan

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ, The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Arizona, Demos, the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, and the law firm Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner filed a federal lawsuit against Arizona Secretary of State Michele Reagan for her office’s violations of the National Voter Registration Act.
League Of Women Voters Of Arizona V. Reagan. Explore Case.
Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2018

Voting Rights

Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ and partner organizations filed a lawsuit challenging Ohio’s practice of ‘purging’ or removing people who vote infrequently from its voting rolls, charging that it is in violation of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA).
Explore case
Husted V. A. Philip Randolph Institute. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2018
Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute

Voting Rights

Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ and partner organizations filed a lawsuit challenging Ohio’s practice of ‘purging’ or removing people who vote infrequently from its voting rolls, charging that it is in violation of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA).
Husted V. A. Philip Randolph Institute. Explore Case.
The back of a demonstrator holding a sign that says "Give Us Fair Districts."
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2018

Voting Rights

Benisek v. Lamone

Does the First Amendment prohibit a state legislature from redistricting that is intended to secure partisan advantage for the governing party and has the effect of entrenching that party’s advantage?
Explore case
Benisek V. Lamone. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2018
The back of a demonstrator holding a sign that says "Give Us Fair Districts."

Voting Rights

Benisek v. Lamone

Does the First Amendment prohibit a state legislature from redistricting that is intended to secure partisan advantage for the governing party and has the effect of entrenching that party’s advantage?
Benisek V. Lamone. Explore Case.
2829
30
3132...