All Cases

15 Supreme Court Cases during the 2024 Term

The TikTok logo.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2025

National Security

+2 桃子视频

TikTok Inc., et al. v. Garland (Amicus)

The Supreme Court will decide whether a law that effectively bans TikTok in the United States violates the First Amendment rights of more than 170 million Americans who use the social media platform. The law also allows the President to ban other foreign-owned apps deemed a national security threat, opening the door to future abuse and censorship. The ban on TikTok is set to go into effect on January 19, 2025.
Explore case
Tiktok Inc., Et Al. V. Garland (amicus). Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2025
The TikTok logo.

National Security

+2 桃子视频

TikTok Inc., et al. v. Garland (Amicus)

The Supreme Court will decide whether a law that effectively bans TikTok in the United States violates the First Amendment rights of more than 170 million Americans who use the social media platform. The law also allows the President to ban other foreign-owned apps deemed a national security threat, opening the door to future abuse and censorship. The ban on TikTok is set to go into effect on January 19, 2025.
Tiktok Inc., Et Al. V. Garland (amicus). Explore Case.
A man holding a sign that says "Death Penalty is Not Justice."
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2025

Capital Punishment

Glossip v. Oklahoma

This long-running Oklahoma death-penalty case raised two issues:   1) Would the State of Oklahoma be permitted to execute Glossip, despite overwhelming evidence that he is innocent, and despite a confession by the State鈥檚 Attorney General that the state obtained his conviction by hiding crucial evidence impeaching its star witness?; and   2) Would the Court reaffirm its longstanding commitment to Due-Process-Clause precedent requiring the government to disclose favorable evidence in its possession to the accused and to correct false testimony introduced against the accused?
Explore case
Glossip V. Oklahoma. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2025
A man holding a sign that says "Death Penalty is Not Justice."

Capital Punishment

Glossip v. Oklahoma

This long-running Oklahoma death-penalty case raised two issues:   1) Would the State of Oklahoma be permitted to execute Glossip, despite overwhelming evidence that he is innocent, and despite a confession by the State鈥檚 Attorney General that the state obtained his conviction by hiding crucial evidence impeaching its star witness?; and   2) Would the Court reaffirm its longstanding commitment to Due-Process-Clause precedent requiring the government to disclose favorable evidence in its possession to the accused and to correct false testimony introduced against the accused?
Glossip V. Oklahoma. Explore Case.
Detention facility in Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, Cuba
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2025

National Security

Connell v. CIA 鈥 FOIA Lawsuit Seeking Records About CIA 鈥淥perational Control鈥 Over a Detention Facility at Guant谩namo Bay

The CIA has refused to disclose whether it has records about its operational control over Camp VII, a detention facility at Guant谩namo Bay. Given the extensive public record about the CIA鈥檚 connection to Camp VII, its refusal to acknowledge that it has responsive records both violates the law and defies common sense. At stake is whether the court will reject the CIA鈥檚 version of official secrecy and call out its fiction of deniability or whether it will allow that fiction to stand.
Explore case
Connell V. Cia 鈥 Foia Lawsuit Seeking Records About Cia 鈥渙perational Control鈥 Over A Detention Facility At Guant谩namo Bay. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2025
Detention facility in Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, Cuba

National Security

Connell v. CIA 鈥 FOIA Lawsuit Seeking Records About CIA 鈥淥perational Control鈥 Over a Detention Facility at Guant谩namo Bay

The CIA has refused to disclose whether it has records about its operational control over Camp VII, a detention facility at Guant谩namo Bay. Given the extensive public record about the CIA鈥檚 connection to Camp VII, its refusal to acknowledge that it has responsive records both violates the law and defies common sense. At stake is whether the court will reject the CIA鈥檚 version of official secrecy and call out its fiction of deniability or whether it will allow that fiction to stand.
Connell V. Cia 鈥 Foia Lawsuit Seeking Records About Cia 鈥渙perational Control鈥 Over A Detention Facility At Guant谩namo Bay. Explore Case.
VA
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2025

Voting Rights

O'Bannon v. King

Virginia permanently disenfranchises all people with felony convictions unless the governor restores their rights. This lawsuit鈥攂rought by the 桃子视频of Virginia and co-counsel partners鈥攁rgues that the policy violates the Readmissions Act of 1870, which bars Virginia from denying the vote based on convictions that didn鈥檛 exist at common law in 1870. The state tried to dismiss the case by invoking sovereign immunity, but the courts rejected that argument. Now, the case moves forward with the potential to restore voting rights to thousands of Virginians.
Explore case
O'bannon V. King. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2025
VA

Voting Rights

O'Bannon v. King

Virginia permanently disenfranchises all people with felony convictions unless the governor restores their rights. This lawsuit鈥攂rought by the 桃子视频of Virginia and co-counsel partners鈥攁rgues that the policy violates the Readmissions Act of 1870, which bars Virginia from denying the vote based on convictions that didn鈥檛 exist at common law in 1870. The state tried to dismiss the case by invoking sovereign immunity, but the courts rejected that argument. Now, the case moves forward with the potential to restore voting rights to thousands of Virginians.
O'bannon V. King. Explore Case.
Pittsburgh
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2025

Voting Rights

Republican National Committee v. Genser

Voters in Butler County, Pennsylvania made a mistake in voting their mail ballots in the April 2024 primary election, forgetting to use the required secrecy envelope. Because their mail ballots could not be counted, they went to the polls in Election Day and voted provisional ballots. The County later determined that it would not count their provisional ballots, and the voter鈥檚 appealed, arguing that Pennsylvania law requires that when an eligible voter attempts to vote by mail but the mail ballot is rendered void due to some defect like lacking a secrecy envelope, the eligible voter may cast a provisional ballot and have that ballot counted notwithstanding the failed attempt to vote by mail.
Explore case
Republican National Committee V. Genser. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2025
Pittsburgh

Voting Rights

Republican National Committee v. Genser

Voters in Butler County, Pennsylvania made a mistake in voting their mail ballots in the April 2024 primary election, forgetting to use the required secrecy envelope. Because their mail ballots could not be counted, they went to the polls in Election Day and voted provisional ballots. The County later determined that it would not count their provisional ballots, and the voter鈥檚 appealed, arguing that Pennsylvania law requires that when an eligible voter attempts to vote by mail but the mail ballot is rendered void due to some defect like lacking a secrecy envelope, the eligible voter may cast a provisional ballot and have that ballot counted notwithstanding the failed attempt to vote by mail.
Republican National Committee V. Genser. Explore Case.
1
2
3

How Do Terms Work?

Between October and late June or early July the Supreme Court is 鈥渋n session,鈥 meaning it hears oral arguments, issues written decisions, and decides whether to take additional cases.

Submitting petitions

Our legal team at the 桃子视频files a cert petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, a type of petition that usually argues that a lower court has incorrectly decided an important question of law that violates civil rights and should be fixed to prevent similar confusion in similar cases.

term starts

U.S. Supreme Court decides to take a case

On average, the Court considers about 7,000 鈥 8,000 petitions each term and accepts about 80 for oral argument.

Oral arguments

This is the period where the U.S. Supreme Court listens to our case in court.

U.S. Supreme Court makes final decisions

While the U.S. Supreme Court makes decisions throughout the term, many are released right before the term ends. If a decision doesn't go in our favor, we fight back!