All Cases

15 Supreme Court Cases during the 2004 Term

MGM Studios v. Grokster
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2005

Free Speech

MGM Studios v. Grokster

Reviewing whether the developers of software that allows for peer-to-peer file sharing can be held liable if that software is used by some consumers for copyright infringement when it is also capable of substantial non-infringing uses. DECIDED
Explore case
Mgm Studios V. Grokster. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2005
MGM Studios v. Grokster

Free Speech

MGM Studios v. Grokster

Reviewing whether the developers of software that allows for peer-to-peer file sharing can be held liable if that software is used by some consumers for copyright infringement when it is also capable of substantial non-infringing uses. DECIDED
Mgm Studios V. Grokster. Explore Case.
FCC v. Brand X Internet Services
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2005

Free Speech

FCC v. Brand X Internet Services

Reviewing whether cable broadband services should be allowed to limit access to a single Internet Service Provider (ISP). DECIDED
Explore case
Fcc V. Brand X Internet Services. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2005
FCC v. Brand X Internet Services

Free Speech

FCC v. Brand X Internet Services

Reviewing whether cable broadband services should be allowed to limit access to a single Internet Service Provider (ISP). DECIDED
Fcc V. Brand X Internet Services. Explore Case.
Jackson v. City of Birmingham
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2005

Smart Justice

Women's Rights

Jackson v. City of Birmingham

Reviewing whether whistleblowers are protected against retaliation under Title IX, which generally prohibits sex discrimination in schools. DECIDED
Explore case
Jackson V. City Of Birmingham. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2005
Jackson v. City of Birmingham

Smart Justice

Women's Rights

Jackson v. City of Birmingham

Reviewing whether whistleblowers are protected against retaliation under Title IX, which generally prohibits sex discrimination in schools. DECIDED
Jackson V. City Of Birmingham. Explore Case.
Roper v. Simmons
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2005

Smart Justice

Capital Punishment

Roper v. Simmons

Challenging the constitutionality of the juvenile death penalty. DECIDED
Explore case
Roper V. Simmons. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2005
Roper v. Simmons

Smart Justice

Capital Punishment

Roper v. Simmons

Challenging the constitutionality of the juvenile death penalty. DECIDED
Roper V. Simmons. Explore Case.
Garrison S. Johnson v. California
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2005

Smart Justice

+2 桃子视频

Garrison S. Johnson v. California

Reviewing whether California's policy of racially segregating all new prisoners should be subject to strict judicial scrutiny. DECIDED
Explore case
Garrison S. Johnson V. California. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2005
Garrison S. Johnson v. California

Smart Justice

+2 桃子视频

Garrison S. Johnson v. California

Reviewing whether California's policy of racially segregating all new prisoners should be subject to strict judicial scrutiny. DECIDED
Garrison S. Johnson V. California. Explore Case.
1
2
3

How Do Terms Work?

Between October and late June or early July the Supreme Court is 鈥渋n session,鈥 meaning it hears oral arguments, issues written decisions, and decides whether to take additional cases.

Submitting petitions

Our legal team at the 桃子视频files a cert petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, a type of petition that usually argues that a lower court has incorrectly decided an important question of law that violates civil rights and should be fixed to prevent similar confusion in similar cases.

term starts

U.S. Supreme Court decides to take a case

On average, the Court considers about 7,000 鈥 8,000 petitions each term and accepts about 80 for oral argument.

Oral arguments

This is the period where the U.S. Supreme Court listens to our case in court.

U.S. Supreme Court makes final decisions

While the U.S. Supreme Court makes decisions throughout the term, many are released right before the term ends. If a decision doesn't go in our favor, we fight back!