Texas

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2023
Danco Laboratories, LLC, v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine; U.S. FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine

Reproductive Freedom

Danco Laboratories, LLC, v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine; U.S. FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine

The 桃子视频 joined over 200 reproductive health, rights, and justice organizations in an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in support of an emergency request to stay a decision issued by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals that severely restricted the use of mifepristone 鈥 a medication used in most abortions in this country 鈥 and threatened the innovation of new drugs and the ability of Americans to access lifesaving drugs.
Danco Laboratories, Llc, V. Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine; U.s. Fda V. Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021
Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson

Reproductive Freedom

Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson

The 桃子视频, the 桃子视频of Texas, and coalition partners filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of abortion providers and funds on July 13, 2021, challenging S.B. 8, a Texas law allowing private citizens to enforce a ban on abortion as early as six weeks in pregnancy鈥攂efore many know they are pregnant. The ACLU鈥檚 challenge made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court three times in as many months. After hearing oral arguments in the case, the Court issued a decision on December 10, 2021, that ended the most promising pathways to blocking the ban. The Supreme Court鈥檚 decision makes it more difficult to obtain adequate relief from the courts and gives states the green light to ban abortion using bounty-hunting schemes. Texas鈥 abortion ban will remain in effect until relief can be secured from a court.
Whole Woman's Health V. Jackson. Explore Case.
Texas
Jul 2021
Sanchez et al v. Dallas County Sheriff et al

Prisoners' Rights

Criminal Law Reform

Sanchez et al v. Dallas County Sheriff et al

Decarceration has always been an emergency, a life and death proposition, but COVID-19 makes this effort intensely urgent. The 桃子视频has been working with our partners to litigate for the rights of those who are incarcerated and cannot protect themselves because of the policies of the institutions in which they are jailed.
Sanchez Et Al V. Dallas County Sheriff Et Al. Explore Case.

All Cases

46 Texas Cases

WMM v. Trump
Texas
Nov 2025

Immigrants' Rights

WMM v. Trump

Emergency lawsuit filed in federal court to again halt removals under the Alien Enemies Act for people within that court鈥檚 judicial district.  
Explore case
Wmm V. Trump. Explore Case.
Texas
Nov 2025
WMM v. Trump

Immigrants' Rights

WMM v. Trump

Emergency lawsuit filed in federal court to again halt removals under the Alien Enemies Act for people within that court鈥檚 judicial district.  
Wmm V. Trump. Explore Case.
A man holding a sign that says "Death Penalty is Not Justice."
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2025

Capital Punishment

Tabler v. Lumpkin

In Tabler v. Lumpkin, the 桃子视频represented a Texas death row prisoner whose lawyers refused to represent him at a hearing to determine his capacity to decide whether to give up his state post-conviction appeals, leaving him effectively unrepresented at that hearing. Our petition asked the Supreme Court to review Richard Tabler鈥檚 case and to hold that when a defendant鈥檚 lawyers abandon him, his waiver of further appeals should not bar his access to federal habeas corpus review of the constitutionality of his conviction.
Explore case
Tabler V. Lumpkin. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2025
A man holding a sign that says "Death Penalty is Not Justice."

Capital Punishment

Tabler v. Lumpkin

In Tabler v. Lumpkin, the 桃子视频represented a Texas death row prisoner whose lawyers refused to represent him at a hearing to determine his capacity to decide whether to give up his state post-conviction appeals, leaving him effectively unrepresented at that hearing. Our petition asked the Supreme Court to review Richard Tabler鈥檚 case and to hold that when a defendant鈥檚 lawyers abandon him, his waiver of further appeals should not bar his access to federal habeas corpus review of the constitutionality of his conviction.
Tabler V. Lumpkin. Explore Case.
Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2025

Free Speech

LGBTQ Rights

Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton

Whether a content-based regulation that burdens adults鈥 access to protected speech has to be merely reasonable to satisfy the First Amendment because it was passed in the name of protecting children from sexual material online.
Explore case
Free Speech Coalition, Inc. V. Paxton. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2025
Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton

Free Speech

LGBTQ Rights

Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton

Whether a content-based regulation that burdens adults鈥 access to protected speech has to be merely reasonable to satisfy the First Amendment because it was passed in the name of protecting children from sexual material online.
Free Speech Coalition, Inc. V. Paxton. Explore Case.
M.A.P.S. v. Garite
Texas
Jun 2025

Immigrants' Rights

M.A.P.S. v. Garite

Emergency lawsuit filed in federal court to again halt removals under the Alien Enemies Act for people within that court鈥檚 judicial district.
Explore case
M.a.p.s. V. Garite. Explore Case.
Texas
Jun 2025
M.A.P.S. v. Garite

Immigrants' Rights

M.A.P.S. v. Garite

Emergency lawsuit filed in federal court to again halt removals under the Alien Enemies Act for people within that court鈥檚 judicial district.
M.a.p.s. V. Garite. Explore Case.
Loe v. Texas
Texas
Mar 2025

LGBTQ Rights

Loe v. Texas

In the spring of 2023, Texas became the largest state in the country to ban gender-affirming care for transgender youth after Governor Greg Abbott signed SB 14. In July 2023, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of five Texas families, three medical professionals, and two organizations representing hundreds of families and health professionals across the state. The five Texas families challenging this law come from diverse backgrounds across the state with transgender children and teenagers. The bill鈥檚 passage alone resulted in families splitting up or planning to leave Texas to continue treatment for their children. The families are suing pseudonymously to protect themselves and their children, who are transgender Texans between the ages of 9 and 16.
Explore case
Loe V. Texas. Explore Case.
Texas
Mar 2025
Loe v. Texas

LGBTQ Rights

Loe v. Texas

In the spring of 2023, Texas became the largest state in the country to ban gender-affirming care for transgender youth after Governor Greg Abbott signed SB 14. In July 2023, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of five Texas families, three medical professionals, and two organizations representing hundreds of families and health professionals across the state. The five Texas families challenging this law come from diverse backgrounds across the state with transgender children and teenagers. The bill鈥檚 passage alone resulted in families splitting up or planning to leave Texas to continue treatment for their children. The families are suing pseudonymously to protect themselves and their children, who are transgender Texans between the ages of 9 and 16.
Loe V. Texas. Explore Case.
1
2
34...