North Carolina

All Cases

23 North Carolina Cases

Short v. Hartman
North Carolina
Jan 2024

Prisoners' Rights

Short v. Hartman

Pretrial detainees cannot be punished because they have not been convicted of any crime. Yet until recently, courts have applied the Eighth Amendment鈥檚 heightened, subjective legal standard applicable to convicted prisoners to claims brought by pretrial detainees. The 桃子视频is working to ensure that courts apply a lower, objective standard to Fourteenth Amendment claims brought by pretrial detainees.
Explore case
Short V. Hartman. Explore Case.
North Carolina
Jan 2024
Short v. Hartman

Prisoners' Rights

Short v. Hartman

Pretrial detainees cannot be punished because they have not been convicted of any crime. Yet until recently, courts have applied the Eighth Amendment鈥檚 heightened, subjective legal standard applicable to convicted prisoners to claims brought by pretrial detainees. The 桃子视频is working to ensure that courts apply a lower, objective standard to Fourteenth Amendment claims brought by pretrial detainees.
Short V. Hartman. Explore Case.
Hasson Bacote posing in a football jersey.
North Carolina
Jun 2023

Capital Punishment

North Carolina Racial Justice Act Litigation (North Carolina v. Hasson Bacote)

Hasson Bacote is challenging his death sentence under the North Carolina Racial Justice Act (RJA), a first-of-its-kind law that allowed those sentenced to death to challenge their death sentences where race was a significant factor in decisions to seek or impose the death penalty at the time of their trials. Earlier this year, Mr. Bacote put forth evidence during a two-week hearing which showed that race played an impermissible role in jury selection not only in his own case, but across North Carolina statewide. The evidence presented at this landmark hearing will have significant implications for the over 130 people sentenced to death who filed similar claims under the Racial Justice Act.
Explore case
North Carolina Racial Justice Act Litigation (north Carolina V. Hasson Bacote). Explore Case.
North Carolina
Jun 2023
Hasson Bacote posing in a football jersey.

Capital Punishment

North Carolina Racial Justice Act Litigation (North Carolina v. Hasson Bacote)

Hasson Bacote is challenging his death sentence under the North Carolina Racial Justice Act (RJA), a first-of-its-kind law that allowed those sentenced to death to challenge their death sentences where race was a significant factor in decisions to seek or impose the death penalty at the time of their trials. Earlier this year, Mr. Bacote put forth evidence during a two-week hearing which showed that race played an impermissible role in jury selection not only in his own case, but across North Carolina statewide. The evidence presented at this landmark hearing will have significant implications for the over 130 people sentenced to death who filed similar claims under the Racial Justice Act.
North Carolina Racial Justice Act Litigation (north Carolina V. Hasson Bacote). Explore Case.
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. Stein
North Carolina
Jun 2023

Reproductive Freedom

Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. Stein

North Carolina health care providers filed a lawsuit on June 16, 2023 challenging several provisions in Senate Bill 20, a sweeping law that severely restricts access to abortion from the earliest stages of pregnancy and bans care after 12 weeks in nearly all circumstances. The case was filed one month after the North Carolina General Assembly rushed S.B. 20 through both chambers and overrode a veto from Gov. Roy Cooper to put it into law. The law 鈥 which was drafted and passed without any opportunity to amend 鈥 is scheduled to take effect on July 1.
Explore case
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic V. Stein. Explore Case.
North Carolina
Jun 2023
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. Stein

Reproductive Freedom

Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. Stein

North Carolina health care providers filed a lawsuit on June 16, 2023 challenging several provisions in Senate Bill 20, a sweeping law that severely restricts access to abortion from the earliest stages of pregnancy and bans care after 12 weeks in nearly all circumstances. The case was filed one month after the North Carolina General Assembly rushed S.B. 20 through both chambers and overrode a veto from Gov. Roy Cooper to put it into law. The law 鈥 which was drafted and passed without any opportunity to amend 鈥 is scheduled to take effect on July 1.
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic V. Stein. Explore Case.
Statue of John Harvard on Harvard University's campus
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2023

Racial Justice

Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard; Students for Fair Admissions v. UNC

This lawsuit contends that the consideration of race as an affirmative action measure in admissions at Harvard and at UNC constitutes racial discrimination in violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
Explore case
Students For Fair Admissions V. Harvard; Students For Fair Admissions V. Unc. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2023
Statue of John Harvard on Harvard University's campus

Racial Justice

Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard; Students for Fair Admissions v. UNC

This lawsuit contends that the consideration of race as an affirmative action measure in admissions at Harvard and at UNC constitutes racial discrimination in violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
Students For Fair Admissions V. Harvard; Students For Fair Admissions V. Unc. Explore Case.
1
2
34...