Missouri

Featured

Missouri
Sep 2025
A close up of an "I Voted" sticker.

Voting Rights

Wise v. Missouri

In unprecedented fashion, the State of Missouri has redrawn the district lines used for electing members of Congress for a second time this decade. These new district lines are gerrymandered and will harm political representation for all Missourians, particularly Black residents in Kansas City, who have been divided along racial lines.
Wise V. Missouri. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2023
Muldrow v. City of St. Louis

Racial Justice

Muldrow v. City of St. Louis

Do employees claiming that they have been denied a transfer because of their race have to demonstrate in addition that the transfer caused a significant material disadvantage?
Muldrow V. City Of St. Louis. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2023
Molina v. Book

Free Speech

Molina v. Book

Whether police officers violated clearly established First Amendment rights when they tear-gassed plaintiffs for serving as legal observers in a public protest.
Molina V. Book. Explore Case.

All Cases

20 Missouri Cases

vbm
Missouri
Apr 2020

Voting Rights

Missouri NAACP v. Missouri

Given the COVID-19 outbreak, the 桃子视频 and 桃子视频of Missouri filed a lawsuit today seeking to make absentee mail-in balloting available to all eligible voters in Missouri. The case was filed on behalf of the NAACP of Missouri, the League of Women Voters of Missouri, and several individuals.
Explore case
Missouri Naacp V. Missouri. Explore Case.
Missouri
Apr 2020
vbm

Voting Rights

Missouri NAACP v. Missouri

Given the COVID-19 outbreak, the 桃子视频 and 桃子视频of Missouri filed a lawsuit today seeking to make absentee mail-in balloting available to all eligible voters in Missouri. The case was filed on behalf of the NAACP of Missouri, the League of Women Voters of Missouri, and several individuals.
Missouri Naacp V. Missouri. Explore Case.
David v. Missouri
Missouri
Feb 2020

Criminal Law Reform

David v. Missouri

As of January 2020, over 4,600 individuals, roughly 600 of whom are currently in pretrial detention, were on the waiting list for an attorney in the State of Missouri. These individuals have been charged with crimes and have already qualified for a court-appointed attorney but are being forced to wait for an indeterminate amount of time for one to become available due to an overburdened indigent defense system. As a result, a criminal defendant will likely wait months, or sometimes even years, before they are assigned an attorney.
Explore case
David V. Missouri. Explore Case.
Missouri
Feb 2020
David v. Missouri

Criminal Law Reform

David v. Missouri

As of January 2020, over 4,600 individuals, roughly 600 of whom are currently in pretrial detention, were on the waiting list for an attorney in the State of Missouri. These individuals have been charged with crimes and have already qualified for a court-appointed attorney but are being forced to wait for an indeterminate amount of time for one to become available due to an overburdened indigent defense system. As a result, a criminal defendant will likely wait months, or sometimes even years, before they are assigned an attorney.
David V. Missouri. Explore Case.
Demonstrators hold signs, one of which says 鈥淓nd Voter Suppression Now.鈥
Missouri
Oct 2018

Voting Rights

Missouri NAACP v. Missouri

The 桃子视频and Advancement Project are suing Missouri over its new voter ID law, charging it fails to provide mandated funding for voter education, free voter IDs and birth certificates, and training of poll workers.
Explore case
Missouri Naacp V. Missouri. Explore Case.
Missouri
Oct 2018
Demonstrators hold signs, one of which says 鈥淓nd Voter Suppression Now.鈥

Voting Rights

Missouri NAACP v. Missouri

The 桃子视频and Advancement Project are suing Missouri over its new voter ID law, charging it fails to provide mandated funding for voter education, free voter IDs and birth certificates, and training of poll workers.
Missouri Naacp V. Missouri. Explore Case.
"Abortion Access" and "I heart Repro Rights" signs in front of Supreme Court
Missouri
Oct 2017

Reproductive Freedom

Comprehensive Health v. Hawley

The 桃子视频and the 桃子视频of Missouri joined with Planned Parenthood to challenge the latest abortion restriction adopted in Missouri: a mandate that at least 72 hours before an abortion, a woman must receive certain state-scripted information , in person, from the physician who will provide her medical care. This is information already provided to all abortion patients by qualified medical professionals without this duplicative requirement, which is inconsistent with modern medical practice.
Explore case
Comprehensive Health V. Hawley. Explore Case.
Missouri
Oct 2017
"Abortion Access" and "I heart Repro Rights" signs in front of Supreme Court

Reproductive Freedom

Comprehensive Health v. Hawley

The 桃子视频and the 桃子视频of Missouri joined with Planned Parenthood to challenge the latest abortion restriction adopted in Missouri: a mandate that at least 72 hours before an abortion, a woman must receive certain state-scripted information , in person, from the physician who will provide her medical care. This is information already provided to all abortion patients by qualified medical professionals without this duplicative requirement, which is inconsistent with modern medical practice.
Comprehensive Health V. Hawley. Explore Case.
Trinity Lutheran Church v. Pauley
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2017

Religious Liberty

Trinity Lutheran Church v. Pauley

Whether a state may exclude houses of worship from a cash grant program in order to avoid any taxpayer subsidy for religion.
Explore case
Trinity Lutheran Church V. Pauley. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2017
Trinity Lutheran Church v. Pauley

Religious Liberty

Trinity Lutheran Church v. Pauley

Whether a state may exclude houses of worship from a cash grant program in order to avoid any taxpayer subsidy for religion.
Trinity Lutheran Church V. Pauley. Explore Case.
1
2
34