Michigan

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2020
Aimee Stephens in front of the Supreme Court

LGBTQ Rights

R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes v EEOC & Aimee Stephens

Aimee Stephens had worked for nearly six years as a funeral director at R.G. and G.R. Harris Funeral Homes when she informed the funeral home鈥檚 owner that she is a transgender woman. She was fired, the EEOC sued on her behalf, and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Aimee鈥檚 employer engaged in unlawful sex discrimination when it fired her because she鈥檚 transgender. We represented Aimee Stephens in front of the U.S. Supreme Court 鈥 and won.
R.g. & G.r. Harris Funeral Homes V Eeoc & Aimee Stephens. Explore Case.

All Cases

30 Michigan Cases

The U.S. Supreme Court building on a sunny day with a blue sky.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2024

Criminal Law Reform

Racial Justice

Carpenter v. United States

This case concerns the First Step Act of 2018, in which Congress made major reductions to the mandatory minimum sentences for certain federal drug and firearm offenses. These changes result in sentences many decades shorter than were required under the previous laws. The question in this case was whether people who were initially sentenced prior to enactment of the First Step Act, but whose sentences were vacated and remanded for resentencing after enactment of the law, can benefit from its major reductions in applicable mandatory minimums. For defendants like Mr. Carpenter, who was originally sentenced to a draconian 116 years in prison as a result of the pre-First Step Act mandatory minimums, applying the First Step Act can mean the difference between dying in prison and having the opportunity to eventually go free. Unfortunately, although there is a split among federal courts of appeals on this question, the Supreme Court denied cert in this case in February 2024.
Explore case
Carpenter V. United States. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2024
The U.S. Supreme Court building on a sunny day with a blue sky.

Criminal Law Reform

Racial Justice

Carpenter v. United States

This case concerns the First Step Act of 2018, in which Congress made major reductions to the mandatory minimum sentences for certain federal drug and firearm offenses. These changes result in sentences many decades shorter than were required under the previous laws. The question in this case was whether people who were initially sentenced prior to enactment of the First Step Act, but whose sentences were vacated and remanded for resentencing after enactment of the law, can benefit from its major reductions in applicable mandatory minimums. For defendants like Mr. Carpenter, who was originally sentenced to a draconian 116 years in prison as a result of the pre-First Step Act mandatory minimums, applying the First Step Act can mean the difference between dying in prison and having the opportunity to eventually go free. Unfortunately, although there is a split among federal courts of appeals on this question, the Supreme Court denied cert in this case in February 2024.
Carpenter V. United States. Explore Case.
Kalamazoo Michigan case
Michigan
Sep 2024

Voting Rights

桃子视频of Michigan v. Froman

Michigan requires boards of county canvassers to certify the results of an election within 14 days after the election based on the total number of votes reported from each location. The law doesn't allow them to withhold certification. Kalamazoo Board of County Canvassers member, Robert Froman, has made clear that he would decline to certify the November 2024 election under certain circumstances. This lawsuit asks the state's courts to make clear that Mr. Froman is duty bound to certify the election based on the number of votes reported.
Explore case
Aclu Of Michigan V. Froman. Explore Case.
Michigan
Sep 2024
Kalamazoo Michigan case

Voting Rights

桃子视频of Michigan v. Froman

Michigan requires boards of county canvassers to certify the results of an election within 14 days after the election based on the total number of votes reported from each location. The law doesn't allow them to withhold certification. Kalamazoo Board of County Canvassers member, Robert Froman, has made clear that he would decline to certify the November 2024 election under certain circumstances. This lawsuit asks the state's courts to make clear that Mr. Froman is duty bound to certify the election based on the number of votes reported.
Aclu Of Michigan V. Froman. Explore Case.
Robert Williams
Michigan
Jan 2024

Privacy & Technology

+2 桃子视频

Williams v. City of Detroit

This case seeks to hold Detroit police accountable for the wrongful arrest of our client due to officers鈥 reliance on a false match from face recognition technology.
Explore case
Williams V. City Of Detroit. Explore Case.
Michigan
Jan 2024
Robert Williams

Privacy & Technology

+2 桃子视频

Williams v. City of Detroit

This case seeks to hold Detroit police accountable for the wrongful arrest of our client due to officers鈥 reliance on a false match from face recognition technology.
Williams V. City Of Detroit. Explore Case.
Long Lake Township v. Maxon
Michigan Supreme Court
Sep 2023

National Security

Privacy & Technology

Long Lake Township v. Maxon

On September 8, 2023, the ACLU, the 桃子视频of Michigan, and the Mackinac Center for Public Policy filed an amicus brief in the Michigan Supreme Court arguing that the local government deploying an unmanned drone to take aerial photographs of the appellant鈥檚 property violated the Fourth Amendment.
Explore case
Long Lake Township V. Maxon. Explore Case.
Michigan Supreme Court
Sep 2023
Long Lake Township v. Maxon

National Security

Privacy & Technology

Long Lake Township v. Maxon

On September 8, 2023, the ACLU, the 桃子视频of Michigan, and the Mackinac Center for Public Policy filed an amicus brief in the Michigan Supreme Court arguing that the local government deploying an unmanned drone to take aerial photographs of the appellant鈥檚 property violated the Fourth Amendment.
Long Lake Township V. Maxon. Explore Case.
Polselli v. Internal Revenue Service
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2023

Privacy & Technology

Polselli v. Internal Revenue Service

This case concerns the scope of the IRS鈥檚 obligation under a federal law to provide notice to individuals that it is seeking their records from a third party, such as a bank, accountant, or lawyer.
Explore case
Polselli V. Internal Revenue Service. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2023
Polselli v. Internal Revenue Service

Privacy & Technology

Polselli v. Internal Revenue Service

This case concerns the scope of the IRS鈥檚 obligation under a federal law to provide notice to individuals that it is seeking their records from a third party, such as a bank, accountant, or lawyer.
Polselli V. Internal Revenue Service. Explore Case.
1
2
34...