Smart Justice

Featured

Mississippi
Mar 2017
Dockery v. Hall

Smart Justice

Prisoners' Rights

Dockery v. Hall

The ACLU, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the Law Offices of Elizabeth Alexander, and the law firm of Covington & Burling LLP, filed a petition for class certification and expert reports for a federal lawsuit on behalf of prisoners at the East Mississippi Correctional Facility (EMCF). The lawsuit, which was filed in May 2013, describes the for-profit prison as hyper-violent, grotesquely filthy and dangerous. EMCF is operated in a perpetual state of crisis where prisoners are at grave risk of death and loss of limbs. The facility, located in Meridian, Mississippi, is supposed to provide intensive treatment to the state's prisoners with serious psychiatric disabilities, many of whom are locked down in long-term solitary confinement.
Dockery V. Hall. Explore Case.

All Cases

190 Smart Justice Cases

Gonzalez v. Ramirez et al.
Texas
Jun 2024

Smart Justice

+3 桃子视频

Gonzalez v. Ramirez et al.

Although Texas law clearly prohibits prosecuting people for terminating their pregnancies, Starr County officials indicted, arrested, and jailed Lizelle Gonzalez for having an abortion. The ACLU鈥檚 Abortion Criminal Defense Initiative and Criminal Law Reform Project, alongside the 桃子视频of Texas and south Texas firm Garza Martinez, are representing Ms. Gonzalez in a lawsuit against Starr County and local officials based on violations of Ms. Gonzalez鈥檚 constitutional rights.
Explore case
Gonzalez V. Ramirez Et Al.. Explore Case.
Texas
Jun 2024
Gonzalez v. Ramirez et al.

Smart Justice

+3 桃子视频

Gonzalez v. Ramirez et al.

Although Texas law clearly prohibits prosecuting people for terminating their pregnancies, Starr County officials indicted, arrested, and jailed Lizelle Gonzalez for having an abortion. The ACLU鈥檚 Abortion Criminal Defense Initiative and Criminal Law Reform Project, alongside the 桃子视频of Texas and south Texas firm Garza Martinez, are representing Ms. Gonzalez in a lawsuit against Starr County and local officials based on violations of Ms. Gonzalez鈥檚 constitutional rights.
Gonzalez V. Ramirez Et Al.. Explore Case.
Cannabis Equity & Inclusion Community v. Nevada Board of Pharmacy
Nevada Supreme Court
Nov 2023

Smart Justice

Criminal Law Reform

Cannabis Equity & Inclusion Community v. Nevada Board of Pharmacy

Nevadans, like voters in many states, have chosen to legalize marijuana for medicinal and recreational use. In Nevada, these changes鈥攁dopted through citizen ballot initiatives and, in the case of medical marijuana, enshrined in the Nevada Constitution鈥攚ere intended to ensure that marijuana is regulated much like alcohol and that law enforcement resources are focused on violent crime, not the prosecution of non-violent drug offenses. Despite these legal changes, Nevada鈥檚 Board of Pharmacy continues to regulate marijuana as a Schedule I controlled substance for purposes of state law, akin to the Board鈥檚 treatment of cocaine and fentanyl. The Board鈥檚 scheduling designation for marijuana has enormous implications for criminal defendants in Nevada since state law makes it a felony to possess or engage in certain other activity with respect to a Schedule I controlled substance, as designated by the Board. This case, brought by an individual and organization harmed by the Board鈥檚 scheduling designation for marijuana, involves the question whether the designation violates the Nevada Constitution and state statutes. The 桃子视频of Nevada is counsel in the case, and the ACLU鈥檚 State Supreme Court Initiative is co-counsel on appeal. In August 2024, the Court held that Pool and CEIC lack standing to challenge marijuana's designation as a Schedule I substance but recognized that other individuals could appropriately do so in the future. The Court did not reach the merits in reversing the district court鈥檚 positive decision.
Explore case
Cannabis Equity & Inclusion Community V. Nevada Board Of Pharmacy. Explore Case.
Nevada Supreme Court
Nov 2023
Cannabis Equity & Inclusion Community v. Nevada Board of Pharmacy

Smart Justice

Criminal Law Reform

Cannabis Equity & Inclusion Community v. Nevada Board of Pharmacy

Nevadans, like voters in many states, have chosen to legalize marijuana for medicinal and recreational use. In Nevada, these changes鈥攁dopted through citizen ballot initiatives and, in the case of medical marijuana, enshrined in the Nevada Constitution鈥攚ere intended to ensure that marijuana is regulated much like alcohol and that law enforcement resources are focused on violent crime, not the prosecution of non-violent drug offenses. Despite these legal changes, Nevada鈥檚 Board of Pharmacy continues to regulate marijuana as a Schedule I controlled substance for purposes of state law, akin to the Board鈥檚 treatment of cocaine and fentanyl. The Board鈥檚 scheduling designation for marijuana has enormous implications for criminal defendants in Nevada since state law makes it a felony to possess or engage in certain other activity with respect to a Schedule I controlled substance, as designated by the Board. This case, brought by an individual and organization harmed by the Board鈥檚 scheduling designation for marijuana, involves the question whether the designation violates the Nevada Constitution and state statutes. The 桃子视频of Nevada is counsel in the case, and the ACLU鈥檚 State Supreme Court Initiative is co-counsel on appeal. In August 2024, the Court held that Pool and CEIC lack standing to challenge marijuana's designation as a Schedule I substance but recognized that other individuals could appropriately do so in the future. The Court did not reach the merits in reversing the district court鈥檚 positive decision.
Cannabis Equity & Inclusion Community V. Nevada Board Of Pharmacy. Explore Case.
United States v. Myles
West Virginia
Aug 2023

Smart Justice

Criminal Law Reform

United States v. Myles

This case challenges a presumption of pretrial detention that applies to nearly all people charged with federal drug offenses.
Explore case
United States V. Myles. Explore Case.
West Virginia
Aug 2023
United States v. Myles

Smart Justice

Criminal Law Reform

United States v. Myles

This case challenges a presumption of pretrial detention that applies to nearly all people charged with federal drug offenses.
United States V. Myles. Explore Case.
Past Due Bill
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2023

Smart Justice

Criminal Law Reform

Daves v. Dallas County

Whether federal courts have the power to remedy systemic unconstitutional pretrial detention practices that remain unchecked by state courts.
Explore case
Daves V. Dallas County. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2023
Past Due Bill

Smart Justice

Criminal Law Reform

Daves v. Dallas County

Whether federal courts have the power to remedy systemic unconstitutional pretrial detention practices that remain unchecked by state courts.
Daves V. Dallas County. Explore Case.
Rosas v. Luna
California
May 2023

Smart Justice

Prisoners' Rights

Rosas v. Luna

Rosas v. Luna is a class action lawsuit brought by the 桃子视频of Southern California (桃子视频SoCal), the ACLU鈥檚 National Prison Project (NPP), and the law firm of Paul Hastings LLP in 2012 against the Los Angeles Sheriff鈥檚 Department (LASD) over its routine, excessive, and unnecessary use of force against incarcerated people in the Los Angeles Jail system.
Explore case
Rosas V. Luna. Explore Case.
California
May 2023
Rosas v. Luna

Smart Justice

Prisoners' Rights

Rosas v. Luna

Rosas v. Luna is a class action lawsuit brought by the 桃子视频of Southern California (桃子视频SoCal), the ACLU鈥檚 National Prison Project (NPP), and the law firm of Paul Hastings LLP in 2012 against the Los Angeles Sheriff鈥檚 Department (LASD) over its routine, excessive, and unnecessary use of force against incarcerated people in the Los Angeles Jail system.
Rosas V. Luna. Explore Case.
1
2
34...