Sentencing Reform

All Cases

9 Sentencing Reform Cases

Dorsey v. U.S.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2012

Sentencing Reform

Dorsey v. United States and Hill v. United States

Whether the federal Fair Sentencing Act, which reduced the sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine from 100:1 to 18:1, applies to defendants who committed their offenses before the Act was passed but were sentenced after the Act's passage.
Explore case
Dorsey V. United States And Hill V. United States. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2012
Dorsey v. U.S.

Sentencing Reform

Dorsey v. United States and Hill v. United States

Whether the federal Fair Sentencing Act, which reduced the sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine from 100:1 to 18:1, applies to defendants who committed their offenses before the Act was passed but were sentenced after the Act's passage.
Dorsey V. United States And Hill V. United States. Explore Case.
Kimbrough v. United States
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2007

Sentencing Reform

Kimbrough v. United States

Whether a federal trial judge may take into account the fact that the current Sentencing Guidelines for crack cocaine have proven unsound and been rejected by the Sentencing Commission itself when sentencing a crack offender. DECIDED
Explore case
Kimbrough V. United States. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2007
Kimbrough v. United States

Sentencing Reform

Kimbrough v. United States

Whether a federal trial judge may take into account the fact that the current Sentencing Guidelines for crack cocaine have proven unsound and been rejected by the Sentencing Commission itself when sentencing a crack offender. DECIDED
Kimbrough V. United States. Explore Case.
Claiborne v. United States
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2006

Sentencing Reform

Claiborne v. United States

Whether federal district court judges have discretion, in appropriate cases, to impose shorter prison terms than the Sentencing Guidelines suggest based, in part, on the unduly harsh consequences of rigidly applying the crack/cocaine disparity. DISMISSED
Explore case
Claiborne V. United States. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2006
Claiborne v. United States

Sentencing Reform

Claiborne v. United States

Whether federal district court judges have discretion, in appropriate cases, to impose shorter prison terms than the Sentencing Guidelines suggest based, in part, on the unduly harsh consequences of rigidly applying the crack/cocaine disparity. DISMISSED
Claiborne V. United States. Explore Case.
1
2