Religion-Based Discrimination Against LGBTQ People

All Cases

14 Religion-Based Discrimination Against LGBTQ People Cases

SCOTUS April 2015
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2023

Religion-Based Discrimination Against LGBTQ People

+2 桃子视频

303 Creative, Inc. v. Elenis

This case concerns whether applying a public-accommodation law to compel a business that chooses to serve the public to provide wedding website design services without discriminating against a same-sex couple violates the free speech clause of the First Amendment.
Explore case
303 Creative, Inc. V. Elenis. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2023
SCOTUS April 2015

Religion-Based Discrimination Against LGBTQ People

+2 桃子视频

303 Creative, Inc. v. Elenis

This case concerns whether applying a public-accommodation law to compel a business that chooses to serve the public to provide wedding website design services without discriminating against a same-sex couple violates the free speech clause of the First Amendment.
303 Creative, Inc. V. Elenis. Explore Case.
Arlene's Flowers et al v. Washington et al
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2021

Religion-Based Discrimination Against LGBTQ People

Religious Liberty

Arlene's Flowers et al v. Washington et al

After the Washington Supreme Court found that the refusal of Arlene鈥檚 Flowers to sell flowers to a gay couple violated Washington Law Against Discrimination and the Consumer Protection Act, the flower shop sought review by the Supreme Court of the United States. The US Supreme Court subsequently remanded to the WA Supreme Court and on June 6, 2019, the WA Supreme Court affirmed their earlier decision. On September 11, 2019, Arlene's Flowers filed to hear the case again, at the Supreme Court of the United States.
Explore case
Arlene's Flowers Et Al V. Washington Et Al. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2021
Arlene's Flowers et al v. Washington et al

Religion-Based Discrimination Against LGBTQ People

Religious Liberty

Arlene's Flowers et al v. Washington et al

After the Washington Supreme Court found that the refusal of Arlene鈥檚 Flowers to sell flowers to a gay couple violated Washington Law Against Discrimination and the Consumer Protection Act, the flower shop sought review by the Supreme Court of the United States. The US Supreme Court subsequently remanded to the WA Supreme Court and on June 6, 2019, the WA Supreme Court affirmed their earlier decision. On September 11, 2019, Arlene's Flowers filed to hear the case again, at the Supreme Court of the United States.
Arlene's Flowers Et Al V. Washington Et Al. Explore Case.
Photo of Evan Minton sitting on a couch in an office.
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2021

Religion-Based Discrimination Against LGBTQ People

Religious Liberty

Dignity Health v. Minton

Evan Minton was turned away from a Dignity Health hospital because he is transgender. He filed a lawsuit against a Dignity Health medical center for withholding medical care because of a patient's gender identity, amounting to sex discrimination in violation of California's Unruh Civil Rights Act.
Explore case
Dignity Health V. Minton. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2021
Photo of Evan Minton sitting on a couch in an office.

Religion-Based Discrimination Against LGBTQ People

Religious Liberty

Dignity Health v. Minton

Evan Minton was turned away from a Dignity Health hospital because he is transgender. He filed a lawsuit against a Dignity Health medical center for withholding medical care because of a patient's gender identity, amounting to sex discrimination in violation of California's Unruh Civil Rights Act.
Dignity Health V. Minton. Explore Case.
April Miller and Karen Roberts
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2019

Religion-Based Discrimination Against LGBTQ People

Religious Liberty

Miller v. Davis

Following the U.S. Supreme Court鈥檚 historic marriage equality ruling in 2015, Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis refused to issue any marriage licenses because of her personal, religious opposition to marriage for same-sex couples. The 桃子视频and the 桃子视频of Kentucky won a preliminary injunction on behalf of Rowan County couples enabling them to marry.
Explore case
Miller V. Davis. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2019
April Miller and Karen Roberts

Religion-Based Discrimination Against LGBTQ People

Religious Liberty

Miller v. Davis

Following the U.S. Supreme Court鈥檚 historic marriage equality ruling in 2015, Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis refused to issue any marriage licenses because of her personal, religious opposition to marriage for same-sex couples. The 桃子视频and the 桃子视频of Kentucky won a preliminary injunction on behalf of Rowan County couples enabling them to marry.
Miller V. Davis. Explore Case.
Couple in Mississppi lawsuit
Mississippi
May 2016

Religion-Based Discrimination Against LGBTQ People

Religious Liberty

Alford v. Moulder

The 桃子视频 and the 桃子视频of Mississippi today filed a lawsuit to challenge HB 1523, the anti-LGBT law that passed this spring. The lawsuit, which targets the Registrar of Vital Records, was filed on behalf of 桃子视频of Mississippi members and Nykolas Alford and Stephen Thomas, a gay couple who are engaged to be married and face discrimination as a result of this law.
Explore case
Alford V. Moulder. Explore Case.
Mississippi
May 2016
Couple in Mississppi lawsuit

Religion-Based Discrimination Against LGBTQ People

Religious Liberty

Alford v. Moulder

The 桃子视频 and the 桃子视频of Mississippi today filed a lawsuit to challenge HB 1523, the anti-LGBT law that passed this spring. The lawsuit, which targets the Registrar of Vital Records, was filed on behalf of 桃子视频of Mississippi members and Nykolas Alford and Stephen Thomas, a gay couple who are engaged to be married and face discrimination as a result of this law.
Alford V. Moulder. Explore Case.
1
2
3