Privacy & Technology

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2018
image

Privacy & Technology

Carpenter v. United States

The Supreme Court ruled that the government needs a warrant to access a person鈥檚 cellphone location history. The court found in a 5 to 4 decision that obtaining such information is a search under the Fourth Amendment and that a warrant from a judge based on probable cause is required.
Carpenter V. United States. Explore Case.
Court Case
Dec 2016
Privacy and technology

Privacy & Technology

Sarkar v. Doe - PubPeer Subpoena Challenge

The 桃子视频filed a motion in Michigan state court challenging the constitutionality of a subpoena issued to the website PubPeer demanding that it turn over the identities of anonymous commenters. In March 2015, the trial judge ruled that PubPeer had to unmask one 鈥 but only one 鈥 of the commenters. Both PubPeer and the researcher appealed, and the ruling was upheld in December 2016.
Sarkar V. Doe - Pubpeer Subpoena Challenge. Explore Case.

All Cases

75 Privacy & Technology Cases

Woodruff v. Oliver
Michigan
Dec 2024

Privacy & Technology

Woodruff v. Oliver

On December 5, 2024, the 桃子视频and the 桃子视频of Michigan filed an amicus brief in Woodruff v. Oliver, a wrongful arrest lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, arguing that the Detroit Police Department鈥檚 (DPD) reliance on flawed facial recognition technology (FRT) impermissibly tainted the investigation and failed to establish probable cause for the plaintiff鈥檚 arrest.
Explore case
Woodruff V. Oliver. Explore Case.
Michigan
Dec 2024
Woodruff v. Oliver

Privacy & Technology

Woodruff v. Oliver

On December 5, 2024, the 桃子视频and the 桃子视频of Michigan filed an amicus brief in Woodruff v. Oliver, a wrongful arrest lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, arguing that the Detroit Police Department鈥檚 (DPD) reliance on flawed facial recognition technology (FRT) impermissibly tainted the investigation and failed to establish probable cause for the plaintiff鈥檚 arrest.
Woodruff V. Oliver. Explore Case.
United States v. Chatrie
Virginia
Sep 2024

Privacy & Technology

United States v. Chatrie

Explore case
United States V. Chatrie. Explore Case.
Virginia
Sep 2024
United States v. Chatrie

Privacy & Technology

United States v. Chatrie

United States V. Chatrie. Explore Case.
NetChoice v. Fitch
Mississippi
Jul 2024

Privacy & Technology

Free Speech

NetChoice v. Fitch

Whether a law that mandates age verification for all users of social media services violates the First Amendment.
Explore case
Netchoice V. Fitch. Explore Case.
Mississippi
Jul 2024
NetChoice v. Fitch

Privacy & Technology

Free Speech

NetChoice v. Fitch

Whether a law that mandates age verification for all users of social media services violates the First Amendment.
Netchoice V. Fitch. Explore Case.
Commonwealth v. Foster
Pennsylvania Supreme Court
Jul 2024

Privacy & Technology

Commonwealth v. Foster

Explore case
Commonwealth V. Foster. Explore Case.
Pennsylvania Supreme Court
Jul 2024
Commonwealth v. Foster

Privacy & Technology

Commonwealth v. Foster

Commonwealth V. Foster. Explore Case.
State v. Mitcham
Arizona
Jun 2024

Privacy & Technology

State v. Mitcham

The 桃子视频and the 桃子视频of Arizona filed amicus briefs before the Arizona Court of Appeals and the Arizona Supreme Court arguing that the government cannot genetically test any biological material it already has in its possession鈥攚hether that鈥檚 blood taken from newborns to test for diseases or swabs collected from sexual assault survivors鈥攖o investigate the donors for a crime without first obtaining a warrant. This filing is part of the broader fight to preserve the privacy of our sensitive genetic information.
Explore case
State V. Mitcham. Explore Case.
Arizona
Jun 2024
State v. Mitcham

Privacy & Technology

State v. Mitcham

The 桃子视频and the 桃子视频of Arizona filed amicus briefs before the Arizona Court of Appeals and the Arizona Supreme Court arguing that the government cannot genetically test any biological material it already has in its possession鈥攚hether that鈥檚 blood taken from newborns to test for diseases or swabs collected from sexual assault survivors鈥攖o investigate the donors for a crime without first obtaining a warrant. This filing is part of the broader fight to preserve the privacy of our sensitive genetic information.
State V. Mitcham. Explore Case.
1
2
34...