Privacy and Surveillance

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2022
FBI v. Fazaga Plaintiffs

Privacy and Surveillance

+2 桃子视频

FBI v. Fazaga

In a case scheduled to be argued before the U.S. Supreme Court on November 8, 2021, three Muslim Americans are challenging the FBI鈥檚 secret spying on them and their communities based on their religion, in violation of the Constitution and federal law. In what will likely be a landmark case, the plaintiffs 鈥 Yassir Fazaga, Ali Uddin Malik, and Yasser Abdelrahim 鈥 insist that the FBI cannot escape accountability for violating their religious freedom by invoking 鈥渟tate secrets.鈥 The plaintiffs are represented by the Center for Immigration Law and Policy at UCLA School of Law, the 桃子视频of Southern California, the 桃子视频, the Council for American Islamic Relations, and the law firm of Hadsell Stormer Renick & Dai.
Fbi V. Fazaga. Explore Case.

All Cases

35 Privacy and Surveillance Cases

Spying
Court Case
Sep 2023

Privacy and Surveillance

桃子视频v. ODNI 鈥 FOIA Lawsuit Seeking Records About Government Surveillance Under the USA Freedom Act

Explore case
Aclu V. Odni 鈥 Foia Lawsuit Seeking Records About Government Surveillance Under The Usa Freedom Act. Explore Case.
Court Case
Sep 2023
Spying

Privacy and Surveillance

桃子视频v. ODNI 鈥 FOIA Lawsuit Seeking Records About Government Surveillance Under the USA Freedom Act

Aclu V. Odni 鈥 Foia Lawsuit Seeking Records About Government Surveillance Under The Usa Freedom Act. Explore Case.
Long Lake Township v. Maxon
Michigan Supreme Court
Sep 2023

Privacy and Surveillance

Privacy & Technology

Long Lake Township v. Maxon

On September 8, 2023, the ACLU, the 桃子视频of Michigan, and the Mackinac Center for Public Policy filed an amicus brief in the Michigan Supreme Court arguing that the local government deploying an unmanned drone to take aerial photographs of the appellant鈥檚 property violated the Fourth Amendment.
Explore case
Long Lake Township V. Maxon. Explore Case.
Michigan Supreme Court
Sep 2023
Long Lake Township v. Maxon

Privacy and Surveillance

Privacy & Technology

Long Lake Township v. Maxon

On September 8, 2023, the ACLU, the 桃子视频of Michigan, and the Mackinac Center for Public Policy filed an amicus brief in the Michigan Supreme Court arguing that the local government deploying an unmanned drone to take aerial photographs of the appellant鈥檚 property violated the Fourth Amendment.
Long Lake Township V. Maxon. Explore Case.
Professor Xi
Court Case
May 2023

Privacy and Surveillance

Xi v. United States 鈥 Challenge to Warrantless Surveillance

The 桃子视频represents Xiaoxing Xi, a Chinese-American physics professor at Temple University, who is suing the government over its dismissed prosecution of him for supposedly sharing sensitive technology with scientists in China. The lawsuit, filed in 2017, challenges the FBI鈥檚 baseless arrest of Xi and it surveillance methods as well as its discriminatory targeting of Chinese-American scientists.
Explore case
Xi V. United States 鈥 Challenge To Warrantless Surveillance. Explore Case.
Court Case
May 2023
Professor Xi

Privacy and Surveillance

Xi v. United States 鈥 Challenge to Warrantless Surveillance

The 桃子视频represents Xiaoxing Xi, a Chinese-American physics professor at Temple University, who is suing the government over its dismissed prosecution of him for supposedly sharing sensitive technology with scientists in China. The lawsuit, filed in 2017, challenges the FBI鈥檚 baseless arrest of Xi and it surveillance methods as well as its discriminatory targeting of Chinese-American scientists.
Xi V. United States 鈥 Challenge To Warrantless Surveillance. Explore Case.
iPhone with "Get a Warrant - ACLU" sticker
Court Case
May 2023

Privacy and Surveillance

National Security

The Warrant Clause in the Digital Age

The information generated by today鈥檚 digital devices and online services reveals private matters far beyond what one could learn from physical analogs. In a series of legal filings and a white paper, available below, the 桃子视频has argued that to keep apace with technological developments and adequately protect our privacy, the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement must be interpreted robustly. Seizures and searches of digital data must be cabined to probable cause, limited to specific categories of information relevant to the investigation, and closely overseen by a neutral magistrate.
Explore case
The Warrant Clause In The Digital Age. Explore Case.
Court Case
May 2023
iPhone with "Get a Warrant - ACLU" sticker

Privacy and Surveillance

National Security

The Warrant Clause in the Digital Age

The information generated by today鈥檚 digital devices and online services reveals private matters far beyond what one could learn from physical analogs. In a series of legal filings and a white paper, available below, the 桃子视频has argued that to keep apace with technological developments and adequately protect our privacy, the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement must be interpreted robustly. Seizures and searches of digital data must be cabined to probable cause, limited to specific categories of information relevant to the investigation, and closely overseen by a neutral magistrate.
The Warrant Clause In The Digital Age. Explore Case.
桃子视频v. FBI - FOIA Case for FBI Records Related to Nondisclosure Agreements for Cell Site Simulators
Court Case
Apr 2023

Privacy and Surveillance

National Security

桃子视频v. FBI - FOIA Case for FBI Records Related to Nondisclosure Agreements for Cell Site Simulators

In 2021, the 桃子视频submitted a FOIA request to the FBI to determine whether the FBI has continued to require state and local law enforcement agencies to enter into nondisclosure agreements before purchasing or using cell site simulators. After appealing and suing, the 桃子视频finally obtained responsive records confirming that the FBI has continued to impose nondisclosure agreements on law enforcement agencies seeking to use the FBI鈥檚 cell site simulators.
Explore case
Aclu V. Fbi - Foia Case For Fbi Records Related To Nondisclosure Agreements For Cell Site Simulators. Explore Case.
Court Case
Apr 2023
桃子视频v. FBI - FOIA Case for FBI Records Related to Nondisclosure Agreements for Cell Site Simulators

Privacy and Surveillance

National Security

桃子视频v. FBI - FOIA Case for FBI Records Related to Nondisclosure Agreements for Cell Site Simulators

In 2021, the 桃子视频submitted a FOIA request to the FBI to determine whether the FBI has continued to require state and local law enforcement agencies to enter into nondisclosure agreements before purchasing or using cell site simulators. After appealing and suing, the 桃子视频finally obtained responsive records confirming that the FBI has continued to impose nondisclosure agreements on law enforcement agencies seeking to use the FBI鈥檚 cell site simulators.
Aclu V. Fbi - Foia Case For Fbi Records Related To Nondisclosure Agreements For Cell Site Simulators. Explore Case.
1
2
34...