Disability Rights

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2023
Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Deborah Laufer

Disability Rights

Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Deborah Laufer

Whether a 鈥渢ester鈥 has standing to challenge a place of public accommodation鈥檚 illegal failure to provide disability accessibility information on its website, even if she does not intend to visit that place of public accommodation.
Acheson Hotels, Llc V. Deborah Laufer. Explore Case.
Georgia
Jun 2020
Harris v. Georgia Department of Corrections

Disability Rights

Harris v. Georgia Department of Corrections

On October 3, 2018, the 桃子视频and the 桃子视频of Georgia, together with National Association of the Deaf and Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of deaf and hard of hearing people incarcerated in prisons supervised by the Georgia Department of Corrections (GDC). The complaint highlights GDC鈥檚 failure to provide incarcerated deaf and hard of hearing people with equally effective communication access to programs, services, and activities, including medical care, telecommunications, and prison programs. Further, due to lack of access to interpreters and other communication accommodations, deaf prisoners are also often unable to explain or defend themselves when GDC takes disciplinary action against them.
Harris V. Georgia Department Of Corrections. Explore Case.
Court Case
Jun 2020
Cobb v. Georgia Department of Community Supervision

Disability Rights

Cobb v. Georgia Department of Community Supervision

The 桃子视频and 桃子视频of Georgia, along with the National Association of the Deaf and Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of deaf and hard of hearing individuals on probation and parole supervised by the Georgia Department of Community Supervision (GDCS). We also sought a preliminary injunction, directing GDCS to immediately provide American Sign Language interpreters, auxiliary aids and services, and reasonable modifications to deaf and hard of hearing individuals on probation or parole.
Cobb V. Georgia Department Of Community Supervision. Explore Case.
Court Case
Aug 2015
S.R. v. Kenton County Sheriff's Office

Disability Rights

Racial Justice

S.R. v. Kenton County Sheriff's Office

A deputy sheriff shackled two elementary school children who have disabilities, causing them pain and trauma, according to a federal lawsuit filed today by the 桃子视频, the Children's Law Center, and Dinsmore & Shohl.
S.r. V. Kenton County Sheriff's Office. Explore Case.

All Cases

27 Disability Rights Cases

Brick Veterans' Affairs Medical Center building with sign shaped like the American flag
California
Dec 2024

Disability Rights

Powers v. McDonough

Every night, thousands of veterans sleep without shelter on the streets of Los Angeles. Meanwhile, the Department of Veterans Affairs owns hundreds of acres of land in prime West Los Angeles鈥攍and directly adjacent to a VA medical facility that was once earmarked to house veterans, but today is instead home to private school sports fields and an oil well.   In November 2022, a group of unhoused veterans and a non-profit organization filed suit alleging that the Department of Veterans Affairs (鈥淰A鈥) failed to provide adequate housing and health care to veterans with severe disabilities in Los Angeles. These failures have significantly undermined veterans鈥 abilities to access the benefits they are entitled to by law, leaving many stranded on the streets after serving our country. The veterans sued the VA under the Rehabilitation Act, a federal statute that prohibits federal agencies from discriminating against people with disabilities. As a remedy, the plaintiffs seek the construction of significant units of permanent supportive housing on the   The VA argued that a provision of the Veterans鈥 Judicial Review Act (鈥淰JRA鈥)鈥 a federal statute that prohibits federal district courts from second-guessing VA鈥檚 individualized benefits determinations鈥攂ars federal district courts from hearing the veterans鈥 Rehabilitation Act claims. Should the court accept this position, it would deprive veterans of a meaningful opportunity to have their rights under the Rehabilitation Act and other generally applicable nondiscrimination statutes enforced.
Explore case
Powers V. Mcdonough. Explore Case.
California
Dec 2024
Brick Veterans' Affairs Medical Center building with sign shaped like the American flag

Disability Rights

Powers v. McDonough

Every night, thousands of veterans sleep without shelter on the streets of Los Angeles. Meanwhile, the Department of Veterans Affairs owns hundreds of acres of land in prime West Los Angeles鈥攍and directly adjacent to a VA medical facility that was once earmarked to house veterans, but today is instead home to private school sports fields and an oil well.   In November 2022, a group of unhoused veterans and a non-profit organization filed suit alleging that the Department of Veterans Affairs (鈥淰A鈥) failed to provide adequate housing and health care to veterans with severe disabilities in Los Angeles. These failures have significantly undermined veterans鈥 abilities to access the benefits they are entitled to by law, leaving many stranded on the streets after serving our country. The veterans sued the VA under the Rehabilitation Act, a federal statute that prohibits federal agencies from discriminating against people with disabilities. As a remedy, the plaintiffs seek the construction of significant units of permanent supportive housing on the   The VA argued that a provision of the Veterans鈥 Judicial Review Act (鈥淰JRA鈥)鈥 a federal statute that prohibits federal district courts from second-guessing VA鈥檚 individualized benefits determinations鈥攂ars federal district courts from hearing the veterans鈥 Rehabilitation Act claims. Should the court accept this position, it would deprive veterans of a meaningful opportunity to have their rights under the Rehabilitation Act and other generally applicable nondiscrimination statutes enforced.
Powers V. Mcdonough. Explore Case.
Mathis v. United States Parole Commission
Washington, D.C.
May 2024

Disability Rights

Criminal Law Reform

Mathis v. United States Parole Commission

This federal class-action lawsuit alleges that the federal government鈥檚 post-conviction supervision system in Washington, D.C., violates Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act by systematically failing to accommodate the needs of people with disabilities on supervision.
Explore case
Mathis V. United States Parole Commission. Explore Case.
Washington, D.C.
May 2024
Mathis v. United States Parole Commission

Disability Rights

Criminal Law Reform

Mathis v. United States Parole Commission

This federal class-action lawsuit alleges that the federal government鈥檚 post-conviction supervision system in Washington, D.C., violates Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act by systematically failing to accommodate the needs of people with disabilities on supervision.
Mathis V. United States Parole Commission. Explore Case.
San Francisco Homeless Encampment, 2016
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2024

Disability Rights

Criminal Law Reform

City of Grants Pass v. Johnson

Whether punishing unhoused people who for sleeping in public when they have no access to shelter violates the Eighth Amendment鈥檚 prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.
Explore case
City Of Grants Pass V. Johnson. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2024
San Francisco Homeless Encampment, 2016

Disability Rights

Criminal Law Reform

City of Grants Pass v. Johnson

Whether punishing unhoused people who for sleeping in public when they have no access to shelter violates the Eighth Amendment鈥檚 prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.
City Of Grants Pass V. Johnson. Explore Case.
OUTMemphis v. Lee
Tennessee
Oct 2023

Disability Rights

+3 桃子视频

OUTMemphis v. Lee

OUTMemphis v. Lee is a first-of-its-kind challenge to a state-level HIV criminalization law as a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Constitution. Plaintiffs OUTMemphis and Jane Does 1-4 seek to strike down Tennessee鈥檚 discriminatory, irrational and cruel enforcement of its 鈥淎ggravated Prostitution鈥 law and related sex offender registration requirements.
Explore case
Outmemphis V. Lee. Explore Case.
Tennessee
Oct 2023
OUTMemphis v. Lee

Disability Rights

+3 桃子视频

OUTMemphis v. Lee

OUTMemphis v. Lee is a first-of-its-kind challenge to a state-level HIV criminalization law as a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Constitution. Plaintiffs OUTMemphis and Jane Does 1-4 seek to strike down Tennessee鈥檚 discriminatory, irrational and cruel enforcement of its 鈥淎ggravated Prostitution鈥 law and related sex offender registration requirements.
Outmemphis V. Lee. Explore Case.
Bread for the City v. District of Columbia
Washington, D.C.
Jul 2023

Disability Rights

Criminal Law Reform

Bread for the City v. District of Columbia

A federal lawsuit challenges the District of Columbia鈥檚 practice of sending police officers rather than mental health providers to respond to mental health emergencies.
Explore case
Bread For The City V. District Of Columbia. Explore Case.
Washington, D.C.
Jul 2023
Bread for the City v. District of Columbia

Disability Rights

Criminal Law Reform

Bread for the City v. District of Columbia

A federal lawsuit challenges the District of Columbia鈥檚 practice of sending police officers rather than mental health providers to respond to mental health emergencies.
Bread For The City V. District Of Columbia. Explore Case.
1
2
34...