Free Speech

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2023
Molina v. Book

Free Speech

Molina v. Book

Whether police officers violated clearly established First Amendment rights when they tear-gassed plaintiffs for serving as legal observers in a public protest.
Molina V. Book. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2023
O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier and Lindke v. Freed

Free Speech

O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier and Lindke v. Freed

The ACLU, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Northern California, and the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Southern California filed amicus briefs in support of everyday people fighting for government transparency and accountability in two cases set for review by the U.S. Supreme Court this Term: O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier and Lindke v. Freed.
O’connor-ratcliff V. Garnier And Lindke V. Freed. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2021
Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.

Free Speech

Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.

On September 25, 2017, the ACLU-PA filed suit on behalf of B.L., a high school sophomore who has been cheerleading since she was in fifth grade and was expelled from the team as punishment for out-of-school speech.
Mahanoy Area School District V. B.l.. Explore Case.

All Cases

158 Free Speech Cases

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2009

Free Speech

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission

Whether a provision of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, which bars unions and corporations (both for-profit and non-profit) from engaging in "electioneering communications," violates the First Amendment and should be struck down as facially unconstitutional.
Explore case
Citizens United V. Federal Election Commission. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2009
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission

Free Speech

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission

Whether a provision of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, which bars unions and corporations (both for-profit and non-profit) from engaging in "electioneering communications," violates the First Amendment and should be struck down as facially unconstitutional.
Citizens United V. Federal Election Commission. Explore Case.
United States v. Stevens
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2009

Free Speech

United States v. Stevens

Whether the First Amendment permits the government to criminalize the interstate sale or possession of any depiction of animal cruelty that is illegal where the depiction is created, sold or possessed, unless the depiction has serious value.
Explore case
United States V. Stevens. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2009
United States v. Stevens

Free Speech

United States v. Stevens

Whether the First Amendment permits the government to criminalize the interstate sale or possession of any depiction of animal cruelty that is illegal where the depiction is created, sold or possessed, unless the depiction has serious value.
United States V. Stevens. Explore Case.
Gillman v. Holmes County School District
Florida
Jul 2009

Free Speech

LGBTQ Rights

Gillman v. Holmes County School District

Explore case
Gillman V. Holmes County School District. Explore Case.
Florida
Jul 2009
Gillman v. Holmes County School District

Free Speech

LGBTQ Rights

Gillman v. Holmes County School District

Gillman V. Holmes County School District. Explore Case.
FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2009

Free Speech

FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.

Whether the FCC improperly reversed its position without adequate justification by recently holding that "fleeting expletives" represent "indecent" speech that can be banned from the airwaves. DECIDED
Explore case
Fcc V. Fox Television Stations, Inc.. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2009
FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.

Free Speech

FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.

Whether the FCC improperly reversed its position without adequate justification by recently holding that "fleeting expletives" represent "indecent" speech that can be banned from the airwaves. DECIDED
Fcc V. Fox Television Stations, Inc.. Explore Case.
Jarrar v. Harris, et al.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2009

Free Speech

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Jarrar v. Harris, et al.

In August 2007, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµand NYCLU filed a federal civil rights lawsuit charging that a Transportation Security Administration (TSA) official and JetBlue Airways illegally discriminated against an American resident, Raed Jarrar, based solely on the Arabic message on his t-shirt and his ethnicity.
Explore case
Jarrar V. Harris, Et Al.. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2009
Jarrar v. Harris, et al.

Free Speech

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Jarrar v. Harris, et al.

In August 2007, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµand NYCLU filed a federal civil rights lawsuit charging that a Transportation Security Administration (TSA) official and JetBlue Airways illegally discriminated against an American resident, Raed Jarrar, based solely on the Arabic message on his t-shirt and his ethnicity.
Jarrar V. Harris, Et Al.. Explore Case.
2728
29
3031...