Criminal Law Reform

Featured

Arizona
Oct 2023
Fund for Empowerment v. Phoenix, City of

Criminal Law Reform

Racial Justice

Fund for Empowerment v. Phoenix, City of

Fund for Empowerment is a challenge to the City of Phoenix’s practice of conducting sweeps of encampments without notice, issuing citations to unsheltered people for camping and sleeping on public property when they have no place else to go, and confiscating and destroying their property without notice or process.
Fund For Empowerment V. Phoenix, City Of. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2023
McElrath v. Georgia

Criminal Law Reform

McElrath v. Georgia

Does the Double Jeopardy Clause bar an appellate court from reviewing and setting aside a jury’s verdicts of acquittal on the ground that the verdict is inconsistent with the jury’s verdict on other charges?
Mcelrath V. Georgia. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2023
Pulsifer v. United States

Criminal Law Reform

Pulsifer v. United States

This case involves the interpretation of a federal law that allows defendants to avoid mandatory minimum sentences for certain nonviolent drug crimes, allowing judges to impose sentences tailored to their individual circumstances.
Pulsifer V. United States. Explore Case.
Texas
Jul 2021
Sanchez et al v. Dallas County Sheriff et al

Criminal Law Reform

Prisoners' Rights

Sanchez et al v. Dallas County Sheriff et al

Decarceration has always been an emergency, a life and death proposition, but COVID-19 makes this effort intensely urgent. The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµhas been working with our partners to litigate for the rights of those who are incarcerated and cannot protect themselves because of the policies of the institutions in which they are jailed.
Sanchez Et Al V. Dallas County Sheriff Et Al. Explore Case.

All Cases

157 Criminal Law Reform Cases

Capital Punishment
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2011

Criminal Law Reform

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Maples v. Thomas

Whether the defendant's failure to file a timely appeal in state court should bar all subsequent federal court review of his death sentence when the reason for the missed deadline was that Alabama officials made no effort to inform him of an adverse decision from the state courts after it was returned unopened by his lawyers' former law firm.
Explore case
Maples V. Thomas. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2011
Capital Punishment

Criminal Law Reform

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Maples v. Thomas

Whether the defendant's failure to file a timely appeal in state court should bar all subsequent federal court review of his death sentence when the reason for the missed deadline was that Alabama officials made no effort to inform him of an adverse decision from the state courts after it was returned unopened by his lawyers' former law firm.
Maples V. Thomas. Explore Case.
Cullen v. Pinholster
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2010

Criminal Law Reform

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Cullen v. Pinholster

Whether the federal courts properly granted habeas corpus relief to the death row inmate in this case after concluding that the state courts had unreasonably rejected his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.
Explore case
Cullen V. Pinholster. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2010
Cullen v. Pinholster

Criminal Law Reform

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Cullen v. Pinholster

Whether the federal courts properly granted habeas corpus relief to the death row inmate in this case after concluding that the state courts had unreasonably rejected his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.
Cullen V. Pinholster. Explore Case.
Connick v. Thompson
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2010

Criminal Law Reform

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Connick v. Thompson

Whether someone who spent 14 years on death row before his murder conviction was overturned because the prosecution withheld exculpatory evidence can recover damages from the prosecutor's office on a theory that it failed to train its staff regarding their constitutional obligations.
Explore case
Connick V. Thompson. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2010
Connick v. Thompson

Criminal Law Reform

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Connick v. Thompson

Whether someone who spent 14 years on death row before his murder conviction was overturned because the prosecution withheld exculpatory evidence can recover damages from the prosecutor's office on a theory that it failed to train its staff regarding their constitutional obligations.
Connick V. Thompson. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2010

Criminal Law Reform

Smart Justice

Safford Unified School District v. Redding

Whether school officials acted unconstitutionally by strip searching a 13-year-old girl based on the uncorroborated accusation of a fellow student and, if so, whether the strip search was so clearly unconstitutional that plaintiff is entitled to damages.
Explore case
Safford Unified School District V. Redding. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2010

Criminal Law Reform

Smart Justice

Safford Unified School District v. Redding

Whether school officials acted unconstitutionally by strip searching a 13-year-old girl based on the uncorroborated accusation of a fellow student and, if so, whether the strip search was so clearly unconstitutional that plaintiff is entitled to damages.
Safford Unified School District V. Redding. Explore Case.
Duncan et al. v. Granholm
Michigan
Apr 2010

Criminal Law Reform

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Duncan et al. v. Granholm

Explore case
Duncan Et Al. V. Granholm. Explore Case.
Michigan
Apr 2010
Duncan et al. v. Granholm

Criminal Law Reform

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Duncan et al. v. Granholm

Duncan Et Al. V. Granholm. Explore Case.
2627
28
2930...