Smart Justice

Featured

Mississippi
Mar 2017
Dockery v. Hall

Smart Justice

Prisoners' Rights

Dockery v. Hall

The ACLU, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the Law Offices of Elizabeth Alexander, and the law firm of Covington & Burling LLP, filed a petition for class certification and expert reports for a federal lawsuit on behalf of prisoners at the East Mississippi Correctional Facility (EMCF). The lawsuit, which was filed in May 2013, describes the for-profit prison as hyper-violent, grotesquely filthy and dangerous. EMCF is operated in a perpetual state of crisis where prisoners are at grave risk of death and loss of limbs. The facility, located in Meridian, Mississippi, is supposed to provide intensive treatment to the state's prisoners with serious psychiatric disabilities, many of whom are locked down in long-term solitary confinement.
Dockery V. Hall. Explore Case.

All Cases

190 Smart Justice Cases

Vermont v. Brillon
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2008

Smart Justice

+4 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Vermont v. Brillon

Whether delays caused by systemic deficiencies in a state's indigent defense system can ever be charged against the state in deciding whether a criminal defendant has been denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial. DECIDED
Explore case
Vermont V. Brillon. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2008
Vermont v. Brillon

Smart Justice

+4 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Vermont v. Brillon

Whether delays caused by systemic deficiencies in a state's indigent defense system can ever be charged against the state in deciding whether a criminal defendant has been denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial. DECIDED
Vermont V. Brillon. Explore Case.
In Re Personal Restraint of Darold R.J. Stenson
Washington
Dec 2008

Smart Justice

Capital Punishment

In Re Personal Restraint of Darold R.J. Stenson

Explore case
In Re Personal Restraint Of Darold R.j. Stenson. Explore Case.
Washington
Dec 2008
In Re Personal Restraint of Darold R.J. Stenson

Smart Justice

Capital Punishment

In Re Personal Restraint of Darold R.J. Stenson

In Re Personal Restraint Of Darold R.j. Stenson. Explore Case.
Medina v. County of San Bernardino
Court Case
Oct 2008

Smart Justice

+3 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Medina v. County of San Bernardino

On December 5, 2007, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµfiled a lawsuit on behalf of Jameelah Medina, a practicing Muslim woman who was forced by local deputies to remove her headscarf (hijab) while she was in custody in San Bernardino County's West Valley Detention Center.
Explore case
Medina V. County Of San Bernardino. Explore Case.
Court Case
Oct 2008
Medina v. County of San Bernardino

Smart Justice

+3 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Medina v. County of San Bernardino

On December 5, 2007, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµfiled a lawsuit on behalf of Jameelah Medina, a practicing Muslim woman who was forced by local deputies to remove her headscarf (hijab) while she was in custody in San Bernardino County's West Valley Detention Center.
Medina V. County Of San Bernardino. Explore Case.
Van de Kamp v. Goldstein
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2008

Smart Justice

+4 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Van de Kamp v. Goldstein

Whether someone who was falsely imprisoned for 24 years based on the untrue testimony of a criminal informant can sue senior administrators in the prosecutor's office for their failure to maintain an even rudimentary record system that would have disclosed impeachment information about the informant prior to trial. DECIDED
Explore case
Van De Kamp V. Goldstein. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2008
Van de Kamp v. Goldstein

Smart Justice

+4 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Van de Kamp v. Goldstein

Whether someone who was falsely imprisoned for 24 years based on the untrue testimony of a criminal informant can sue senior administrators in the prosecutor's office for their failure to maintain an even rudimentary record system that would have disclosed impeachment information about the informant prior to trial. DECIDED
Van De Kamp V. Goldstein. Explore Case.
Fitzgerald v. Barnstable School Committee
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2008

Smart Justice

Women's Rights

Fitzgerald v. Barnstable School Committee

Whether Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which generally prohibits sex discrimination in federally-funded schools, bars public school students from also challenging sex discrimination as a violation of the Constitution.DECIDED
Explore case
Fitzgerald V. Barnstable School Committee. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2008
Fitzgerald v. Barnstable School Committee

Smart Justice

Women's Rights

Fitzgerald v. Barnstable School Committee

Whether Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which generally prohibits sex discrimination in federally-funded schools, bars public school students from also challenging sex discrimination as a violation of the Constitution.DECIDED
Fitzgerald V. Barnstable School Committee. Explore Case.
2526
27
2829...