Criminal Law Reform

Featured

Arizona
Oct 2023
Fund for Empowerment v. Phoenix, City of

Criminal Law Reform

Racial Justice

Fund for Empowerment v. Phoenix, City of

Fund for Empowerment is a challenge to the City of Phoenix’s practice of conducting sweeps of encampments without notice, issuing citations to unsheltered people for camping and sleeping on public property when they have no place else to go, and confiscating and destroying their property without notice or process.
Fund For Empowerment V. Phoenix, City Of. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2023
McElrath v. Georgia

Criminal Law Reform

McElrath v. Georgia

Does the Double Jeopardy Clause bar an appellate court from reviewing and setting aside a jury’s verdicts of acquittal on the ground that the verdict is inconsistent with the jury’s verdict on other charges?
Mcelrath V. Georgia. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2023
Pulsifer v. United States

Criminal Law Reform

Pulsifer v. United States

This case involves the interpretation of a federal law that allows defendants to avoid mandatory minimum sentences for certain nonviolent drug crimes, allowing judges to impose sentences tailored to their individual circumstances.
Pulsifer V. United States. Explore Case.
Texas
Jul 2021
Sanchez et al v. Dallas County Sheriff et al

Criminal Law Reform

Prisoners' Rights

Sanchez et al v. Dallas County Sheriff et al

Decarceration has always been an emergency, a life and death proposition, but COVID-19 makes this effort intensely urgent. The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµhas been working with our partners to litigate for the rights of those who are incarcerated and cannot protect themselves because of the policies of the institutions in which they are jailed.
Sanchez Et Al V. Dallas County Sheriff Et Al. Explore Case.

All Cases

157 Criminal Law Reform Cases

Barnes v. Camden
Court Case
Mar 2012

Criminal Law Reform

Smart Justice

Barnes v. Camden

In July 2010, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµand the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof New Jersey filed a lawsuit on behalf of an innocent Camden, New Jersey man, Joel Barnes, who was jailed for more than a year as the result of having drugs planted on him by police officers later implicated in a large-scale evidence-planting conspiracy affecting nearly 200 other Camden residents. Mr. Barnes is seeking compensatory damages, as well as injunctive relief designed to prevent such conduct among Camden police officers from occurring in the future.
Explore case
Barnes V. Camden. Explore Case.
Court Case
Mar 2012
Barnes v. Camden

Criminal Law Reform

Smart Justice

Barnes v. Camden

In July 2010, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµand the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof New Jersey filed a lawsuit on behalf of an innocent Camden, New Jersey man, Joel Barnes, who was jailed for more than a year as the result of having drugs planted on him by police officers later implicated in a large-scale evidence-planting conspiracy affecting nearly 200 other Camden residents. Mr. Barnes is seeking compensatory damages, as well as injunctive relief designed to prevent such conduct among Camden police officers from occurring in the future.
Barnes V. Camden. Explore Case.
Arizona v. U.S.
Court Case
Jan 2012

Criminal Law Reform

Smart Justice

Arizona v. U.S.

Explore case
Arizona V. U.s.. Explore Case.
Court Case
Jan 2012
Arizona v. U.S.

Criminal Law Reform

Smart Justice

Arizona v. U.S.

Arizona V. U.s.. Explore Case.
MESSERSCHMIDT
U.S. Supreme Court
Oct 2011

Criminal Law Reform

Messerschmidt v. Millender

Whether a police officer can be held liable for executing a search warrant when it is objectively unreasonable to believe that the warrant is supported by probable cause.
Explore case
Messerschmidt V. Millender. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Oct 2011
MESSERSCHMIDT

Criminal Law Reform

Messerschmidt v. Millender

Whether a police officer can be held liable for executing a search warrant when it is objectively unreasonable to believe that the warrant is supported by probable cause.
Messerschmidt V. Millender. Explore Case.
Vermont
Sep 2011

Criminal Law Reform

In Re: Search Warrants

In June 2011, the ACLU, ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Vermont and the Electronic Frontier Foundation filed a brief urging the Vermont Supreme Court to reject demands by local prosecutors to override warrant restrictions imposed by the court and allow a limitless search of a personal computer.
Explore case
In Re: Search Warrants. Explore Case.
Vermont
Sep 2011

Criminal Law Reform

In Re: Search Warrants

In June 2011, the ACLU, ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Vermont and the Electronic Frontier Foundation filed a brief urging the Vermont Supreme Court to reject demands by local prosecutors to override warrant restrictions imposed by the court and allow a limitless search of a personal computer.
In Re: Search Warrants. Explore Case.
Lafler v. Cooper and Missouri v. Frye
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2011

Criminal Law Reform

Smart Justice

Lafler v. Cooper and Missouri v. Frye

Whether a criminal defendant who forgoes a plea bargain because of ineffective assistance of counsel is entitled to relief if he subsequently receives a longer sentence after conviction than the prosecutor initially offered.
Explore case
Lafler V. Cooper And Missouri V. Frye. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2011
Lafler v. Cooper and Missouri v. Frye

Criminal Law Reform

Smart Justice

Lafler v. Cooper and Missouri v. Frye

Whether a criminal defendant who forgoes a plea bargain because of ineffective assistance of counsel is entitled to relief if he subsequently receives a longer sentence after conviction than the prosecutor initially offered.
Lafler V. Cooper And Missouri V. Frye. Explore Case.
2526
27
2829...