Mass Incarceration

All Cases

158 Mass Incarceration Cases

Tartakovsky v. Pierre
Court Case
Aug 2007

Mass Incarceration

Immigrants' Rights

Tartakovsky v. Pierre

On April 3, 2009, the 桃子视频Immigrants' Rights Project, the 桃子视频of San Diego and Imperial Counties and cooperating counsel at DLA Piper, LLP, settled the Ninth Circuit appeal in Tartakovsky v. Pierre, a proposed class action lawsuit challenging systemic delays in the naturalization process in the San Diego region. As part of the agreement, the 桃子视频voluntarily dismissed the appeal after obtaining the release of data demonstrating the government's progress in reducing the backlog of naturalization delays based on the 鈥淔BI name check鈥 procedure. From August 2007, when the Tartakovsky lawsuit was filed, to February 2009, the number of naturalization applicants in the San Diego region with an FBI name check pending for more than 120 days was reduced from 2,564 to zero.
Explore case
Tartakovsky V. Pierre. Explore Case.
Court Case
Aug 2007
Tartakovsky v. Pierre

Mass Incarceration

Immigrants' Rights

Tartakovsky v. Pierre

On April 3, 2009, the 桃子视频Immigrants' Rights Project, the 桃子视频of San Diego and Imperial Counties and cooperating counsel at DLA Piper, LLP, settled the Ninth Circuit appeal in Tartakovsky v. Pierre, a proposed class action lawsuit challenging systemic delays in the naturalization process in the San Diego region. As part of the agreement, the 桃子视频voluntarily dismissed the appeal after obtaining the release of data demonstrating the government's progress in reducing the backlog of naturalization delays based on the 鈥淔BI name check鈥 procedure. From August 2007, when the Tartakovsky lawsuit was filed, to February 2009, the number of naturalization applicants in the San Diego region with an FBI name check pending for more than 120 days was reduced from 2,564 to zero.
Tartakovsky V. Pierre. Explore Case.
Danforth v. Minnesota
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2007

Mass Incarceration

Capital Punishment

Danforth v. Minnesota

Whether a state can permit an inmate to raise constitutional claims in state post-conviction proceedings that would be barred in federal habeas proceedings. DECIDED
Explore case
Danforth V. Minnesota. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2007
Danforth v. Minnesota

Mass Incarceration

Capital Punishment

Danforth v. Minnesota

Whether a state can permit an inmate to raise constitutional claims in state post-conviction proceedings that would be barred in federal habeas proceedings. DECIDED
Danforth V. Minnesota. Explore Case.
Brendlin v. California
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2007

Mass Incarceration

+2 桃子视频

Brendlin v. California

Reviewing whether a car's passenger can challenge an illegal traffic stop under the Fourth Amendment. DECIDED
Explore case
Brendlin V. California. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2007
Brendlin v. California

Mass Incarceration

+2 桃子视频

Brendlin v. California

Reviewing whether a car's passenger can challenge an illegal traffic stop under the Fourth Amendment. DECIDED
Brendlin V. California. Explore Case.
In Re Spears
Court Case
Apr 2007

Mass Incarceration

+4 桃子视频

In Re Spears

Defending juveniles' pre-trial right to counsel in Ohio.
Explore case
In Re Spears. Explore Case.
Court Case
Apr 2007
In Re Spears

Mass Incarceration

+4 桃子视频

In Re Spears

Defending juveniles' pre-trial right to counsel in Ohio.
In Re Spears. Explore Case.
Uttecht v. Brown
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2007

Mass Incarceration

Capital Punishment

Uttecht v. Brown

Reviewing whether the state courts improperly excluded a prospective juror in a death penalty case after he indicated that future dangerousness was a relevant consideration but that he would, in any event, follow the law as instructed by the judge. DECIDED
Explore case
Uttecht V. Brown. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2007
Uttecht v. Brown

Mass Incarceration

Capital Punishment

Uttecht v. Brown

Reviewing whether the state courts improperly excluded a prospective juror in a death penalty case after he indicated that future dangerousness was a relevant consideration but that he would, in any event, follow the law as instructed by the judge. DECIDED
Uttecht V. Brown. Explore Case.
2324
25
2627...