LGBTQ Rights

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2020
Aimee Stephens in front of the Supreme Court

LGBTQ Rights

R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes v EEOC & Aimee Stephens

Aimee Stephens had worked for nearly six years as a funeral director at R.G. and G.R. Harris Funeral Homes when she informed the funeral home’s owner that she is a transgender woman. She was fired, the EEOC sued on her behalf, and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Aimee’s employer engaged in unlawful sex discrimination when it fired her because she’s transgender. We represented Aimee Stephens in front of the U.S. Supreme Court — and won.
R.g. & G.r. Harris Funeral Homes V Eeoc & Aimee Stephens. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2019
Don Zarda, Melissa Zarda, Bill Moore

LGBTQ Rights

Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda

Don Zarda loved to skydive. He worked as a skydiving instructor at Altitude Express, a company on Long Island, N.Y. He was fired for being gay.
Altitude Express Inc. V. Zarda. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2018
David Mullins and Charlie Craig

LGBTQ Rights

Religious Liberty

Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission

Whether a business open to the public has a constitutional right to discriminate.
Masterpiece Cakeshop V. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2015
Jim Obergefell

LGBTQ Rights

Obergefell, et al. v. Hodges - Freedom to Marry in Ohio

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Ohio and Alphonse Gerhardstein of Gerhardstein & Branch have filed suit on behalf of Jim Obergefell and David Michener, two widowers, and Robert Grunn, a funeral director, in a challenge to the Ohio constitutional and statutory marriage recognition bans.
Obergefell, Et Al. V. Hodges - Freedom To Marry In Ohio. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2015
Bourke Family

LGBTQ Rights

Bourke v. Beshear & Love v. Beshear - Freedom to Marry in Kentucky

Bourke v. Beshear is a federal court challenge to Kentucky's constitutional ban on marriage for same-sex couples, filed by attorneys at Clay Daniel Walton & Adams and Fauver Law Office on July 26, 2013, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. The plaintiffs are four same-sex couples seeking state recognition of their out-of-state marriages.
Bourke V. Beshear & Love V. Beshear - Freedom To Marry In Kentucky. Explore Case.

All Cases

190 LGBTQ Rights Cases

Aaron-Brush v. Bentley - Freedom to Marry in Alabama
Alabama
Jun 2014

LGBTQ Rights

Aaron-Brush v. Bentley - Freedom to Marry in Alabama

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ and the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Alabama have filed a federal lawsuit challenging Alabama's ban on marriage for same-sex couples. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of April and Ginger Aaron-Brush of Birmingham. The couple was wed in Massachusetts, but their marriage is not recognized in their home state.
Explore case
Aaron-brush V. Bentley - Freedom To Marry In Alabama. Explore Case.
Alabama
Jun 2014
Aaron-Brush v. Bentley - Freedom to Marry in Alabama

LGBTQ Rights

Aaron-Brush v. Bentley - Freedom to Marry in Alabama

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ and the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Alabama have filed a federal lawsuit challenging Alabama's ban on marriage for same-sex couples. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of April and Ginger Aaron-Brush of Birmingham. The couple was wed in Massachusetts, but their marriage is not recognized in their home state.
Aaron-brush V. Bentley - Freedom To Marry In Alabama. Explore Case.
Rummell and West v. Kitzhaber - Freedom to Marry in Oregon
Oregon
Jun 2014

LGBTQ Rights

Rummell and West v. Kitzhaber - Freedom to Marry in Oregon

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Oregon, and volunteer counsel from the law firms of Johnson, Johnson & Schaller, PC and Perkins Coie, LLP in December 2013 filed a federal lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Eugene on behalf of two same-sex couples who wished to marry in Oregon – Paul Rummell and Ben West, and Lisa Chickadonz and Christine Tanner – and Basic Rights Education Fund.
Explore case
Rummell And West V. Kitzhaber - Freedom To Marry In Oregon. Explore Case.
Oregon
Jun 2014
Rummell and West v. Kitzhaber - Freedom to Marry in Oregon

LGBTQ Rights

Rummell and West v. Kitzhaber - Freedom to Marry in Oregon

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Oregon, and volunteer counsel from the law firms of Johnson, Johnson & Schaller, PC and Perkins Coie, LLP in December 2013 filed a federal lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Eugene on behalf of two same-sex couples who wished to marry in Oregon – Paul Rummell and Ben West, and Lisa Chickadonz and Christine Tanner – and Basic Rights Education Fund.
Rummell And West V. Kitzhaber - Freedom To Marry In Oregon. Explore Case.
Gerber and Berlin v. Cooper - Freedom to Marry in North Carolina
North Carolina
Jun 2014

LGBTQ Rights

Gerber and Berlin v. Cooper - Freedom to Marry in North Carolina

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof North Carolina Legal Foundation and the law firms of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP and Ellis & Winters LLP have filed a new case in federal court on behalf of three married, same-sex couples seeking state recognition of their marriages. Because of the serious medical condition of one member of each couple, they are asking the court to take swift action.
Explore case
Gerber And Berlin V. Cooper - Freedom To Marry In North Carolina. Explore Case.
North Carolina
Jun 2014
Gerber and Berlin v. Cooper - Freedom to Marry in North Carolina

LGBTQ Rights

Gerber and Berlin v. Cooper - Freedom to Marry in North Carolina

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof North Carolina Legal Foundation and the law firms of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP and Ellis & Winters LLP have filed a new case in federal court on behalf of three married, same-sex couples seeking state recognition of their marriages. Because of the serious medical condition of one member of each couple, they are asking the court to take swift action.
Gerber And Berlin V. Cooper - Freedom To Marry In North Carolina. Explore Case.
Whitewood v. Wolf - Freedom to Marry in Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania
May 2014

LGBTQ Rights

Whitewood v. Wolf - Freedom to Marry in Pennsylvania

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ of Pennsylvania, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ, and volunteer counsel from the law firm of Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin & Schiller have filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of 21 Pennsylvanians who wish to marry in Pennsylvania or want the Commonwealth to recognize their out-of-state marriages. The lawsuit alleges that Pennsylvania's Defense of Marriage Act and refusal to marry lesbian and gay couples or recognize their out-of-state marriages violates the fundamental right to marry as well as the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Explore case
Whitewood V. Wolf - Freedom To Marry In Pennsylvania. Explore Case.
Pennsylvania
May 2014
Whitewood v. Wolf - Freedom to Marry in Pennsylvania

LGBTQ Rights

Whitewood v. Wolf - Freedom to Marry in Pennsylvania

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ of Pennsylvania, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ, and volunteer counsel from the law firm of Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin & Schiller have filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of 21 Pennsylvanians who wish to marry in Pennsylvania or want the Commonwealth to recognize their out-of-state marriages. The lawsuit alleges that Pennsylvania's Defense of Marriage Act and refusal to marry lesbian and gay couples or recognize their out-of-state marriages violates the fundamental right to marry as well as the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Whitewood V. Wolf - Freedom To Marry In Pennsylvania. Explore Case.
Schmidt and Schuh v. Alaska
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2014

LGBTQ Rights

Schmidt and Schuh v. Alaska

Same-sex couples challenging Alaska's discriminatory tax law
Explore case
Schmidt And Schuh V. Alaska. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2014
Schmidt and Schuh v. Alaska

LGBTQ Rights

Schmidt and Schuh v. Alaska

Same-sex couples challenging Alaska's discriminatory tax law
Schmidt And Schuh V. Alaska. Explore Case.
2324
25
2627...