Immigrants' Rights

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2022
Garland v. Gonzalez

Immigrants' Rights

Garland v. Gonzalez

Whether the Immigration and Nationality Act requires a bond hearing for immigrants subject to prolonged detention while seeking protection in the U.S. from persecution or torture.
Garland V. Gonzalez. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2021
Border Asylum Line

Immigrants' Rights

Innovation Law Lab v. Wolf

The 桃子视频, Southern Poverty Law Center, and Center for Gender & Refugee Studies filed a federal lawsuit challenging the Trump administration鈥檚 new policy forcing asylum seekers to return to Mexico and remain there while their cases are considered.
Innovation Law Lab V. Wolf. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2021
Trump Declaring National Emergency

Immigrants' Rights

National Security

Sierra Club v. Trump 鈥 Challenge to Trump鈥檚 National Emergency Declaration to Construct a Border Wall

In February 2019, the 桃子视频filed a lawsuit challenging President Trump鈥檚 emergency powers declaration to secure funds to build a wall along the southern border. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition. The lawsuit argues that the president is usurping Congress鈥檚 appropriations power and threatening the clearly defined separation of powers inscribed in the Constitution. On January 20, 2021, President Biden halted further border wall construction. Litigation in this and subsequent related challenges has been paused or deadlines extended while the ACLU鈥檚 clients and the Biden administration determine next steps.
Sierra Club V. Trump 鈥 Challenge To Trump鈥檚 National Emergency Declaration To Construct A Border Wall. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2020
Department of Homeland Security v. Vijayakumar Thuraissigiam

Immigrants' Rights

Department of Homeland Security v. Vijayakumar Thuraissigiam

Whether immigrants are entitled to seek judicial review of their 鈥渆xpedited removal鈥 orders in federal court.
Department Of Homeland Security V. Vijayakumar Thuraissigiam. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2020
Muslim girl with her family

Immigrants' Rights

International Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump

The 桃子视频 and other partner organizations filed a federal lawsuit challenging President Trump鈥檚 Muslim ban executive order, charging it violates the Constitution 鈥 including the First Amendment鈥檚 prohibition of government establishment of religion and the Fifth Amendment鈥檚 guarantees of equal treatment under the law 鈥 and federal laws.
International Refugee Assistance Project V. Trump. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2019
Nielsen v. Preap

Immigrants' Rights

Nielsen v. Preap

Whether the government can require that certain people are detained for the duration of their deportation proceedings 鈥 without a hearing 鈥 because they have past criminal records.
Nielsen V. Preap. Explore Case.
Court Case
May 2018
Jessica Colotl

Immigrants' Rights

Colotl v. Kelly

UPDATE 5/25/18: The Department of Homeland Security has agreed to renew Jessica Colotl鈥檚 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and work permit to resolve a lawsuit brought by the 桃子视频, the 桃子视频of Georgia, and Kuck Baxter Immigration in May 2017 against DHS for arbitrarily terminating Jessica鈥檚 DACA and rejecting her renewal application.
Colotl V. Kelly. Explore Case.
Indiana
Oct 2016
Exodus Refugee Immigration, Inc. v. Mike Pence, et al

Immigrants' Rights

National Security

Exodus Refugee Immigration, Inc. v. Mike Pence, et al

The 桃子视频 and the 桃子视频of Indiana, on behalf of Exodus Refugee Immigration, filed suit against Governor Mike Pence and the secretary of the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration to stop attempts to suspend resettlement of Syrian refugees, claiming the governor鈥檚 actions violate the United States Constitution and federal law.
Exodus Refugee Immigration, Inc. V. Mike Pence, Et Al. Explore Case.

All Cases

186 Immigrants' Rights Cases

Lopez-Valenzuela, et al. v. Maricopa County, et al.
Arizona
Jun 2015

Immigrants' Rights

Lopez-Valenzuela, et al. v. Maricopa County, et al.

After a long legal battle the ACLU, on behalf of plaintiffs in Lopez Valenzuela v. Maricopa County prevailed by blocking further implementation of a law that for years did not allow judges to even consider bail for criminal defendants who were suspected of having entered or remained in the United States illegally, and which applied to most state felony charges in Arizona, including relatively minor crimes such as shoplifting and possessing a phony ID. As a result of Proposition 100, which amended the state constitution, state courts were required to jail countless individuals who posed no risk of flight or danger to others.
Explore case
Lopez-valenzuela, Et Al. V. Maricopa County, Et Al.. Explore Case.
Arizona
Jun 2015
Lopez-Valenzuela, et al. v. Maricopa County, et al.

Immigrants' Rights

Lopez-Valenzuela, et al. v. Maricopa County, et al.

After a long legal battle the ACLU, on behalf of plaintiffs in Lopez Valenzuela v. Maricopa County prevailed by blocking further implementation of a law that for years did not allow judges to even consider bail for criminal defendants who were suspected of having entered or remained in the United States illegally, and which applied to most state felony charges in Arizona, including relatively minor crimes such as shoplifting and possessing a phony ID. As a result of Proposition 100, which amended the state constitution, state courts were required to jail countless individuals who posed no risk of flight or danger to others.
Lopez-valenzuela, Et Al. V. Maricopa County, Et Al.. Explore Case.
Hispanic Interest Coalition of Alabama v. Bentley
Alabama
Mar 2015

Immigrants' Rights

Smart Justice

Hispanic Interest Coalition of Alabama v. Bentley

The Alabama state legislature passed a draconian anti-immigrant law in June, 2011, the toughest of several state laws modeled after Arizona鈥檚 SB 1070. Like the Arizona law, SB 56 authorized police to ask for proof of citizenship or immigration status during a traffic stop based on 鈥渞easonable suspicion鈥 that the person was an undocumented immigrant. The law went even further than Arizona鈥檚, with provisions that required public school officials to verify the immigration status of children and their parents, that made it a crime for undocumented immigrants to solicit work, and criminalized Alabamians for ordinary, everyday interactions with undocumented individuals like renting a mobile home or offering a ride.
Explore case
Hispanic Interest Coalition Of Alabama V. Bentley. Explore Case.
Alabama
Mar 2015
Hispanic Interest Coalition of Alabama v. Bentley

Immigrants' Rights

Smart Justice

Hispanic Interest Coalition of Alabama v. Bentley

The Alabama state legislature passed a draconian anti-immigrant law in June, 2011, the toughest of several state laws modeled after Arizona鈥檚 SB 1070. Like the Arizona law, SB 56 authorized police to ask for proof of citizenship or immigration status during a traffic stop based on 鈥渞easonable suspicion鈥 that the person was an undocumented immigrant. The law went even further than Arizona鈥檚, with provisions that required public school officials to verify the immigration status of children and their parents, that made it a crime for undocumented immigrants to solicit work, and criminalized Alabamians for ordinary, everyday interactions with undocumented individuals like renting a mobile home or offering a ride.
Hispanic Interest Coalition Of Alabama V. Bentley. Explore Case.
Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights, et al. v. Deal
Georgia
Mar 2015

Immigrants' Rights

Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights, et al. v. Deal

On June 2, 2011, the 桃子视频Immigrants鈥 Rights Project joined with the 桃子视频Racial Justice Project, the 桃子视频of Georgia, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), Asian Law Caucus, the National Immigration Law Center (NILC), and private co-counsel to file a lawsuit challenging Georgia's anti-immigrant law, HB 87, which was inspired by Arizona's notorious SB 1070. The Georgia law authorized police to demand papers demonstrating citizenship or immigration status during traffic stops, criminalized Georgians in their daily interaction with immigrants, and made it nearly impossible for individuals without specific identification documents to access state facilities and services.
Explore case
Georgia Latino Alliance For Human Rights, Et Al. V. Deal. Explore Case.
Georgia
Mar 2015
Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights, et al. v. Deal

Immigrants' Rights

Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights, et al. v. Deal

On June 2, 2011, the 桃子视频Immigrants鈥 Rights Project joined with the 桃子视频Racial Justice Project, the 桃子视频of Georgia, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), Asian Law Caucus, the National Immigration Law Center (NILC), and private co-counsel to file a lawsuit challenging Georgia's anti-immigrant law, HB 87, which was inspired by Arizona's notorious SB 1070. The Georgia law authorized police to demand papers demonstrating citizenship or immigration status during traffic stops, criminalized Georgians in their daily interaction with immigrants, and made it nearly impossible for individuals without specific identification documents to access state facilities and services.
Georgia Latino Alliance For Human Rights, Et Al. V. Deal. Explore Case.
Buquer, et al. v. City of Indianapolis
Indiana
Feb 2015

Immigrants' Rights

Buquer, et al. v. City of Indianapolis

On May 25, 2011 the 桃子视频 of Indiana, the ACLU鈥檚 Immigrants鈥 Rights Project, and the National Immigration Law Center (NILC). filed a class action lawsuit challenging a discriminatory Indiana law inspired by Arizona鈥檚 notorious SB 1070. According to the lawsuit, the law unlawfully authorizes police to make warrantless arrests of individuals based on assumed immigration status and criminalizes the mere use or acceptance of the commonly used consular ID card. The groups charged that the law would lead to racial profiling and trample upon the rights of all Indiana residents in violation of the U.S. Constitution.
Explore case
Buquer, Et Al. V. City Of Indianapolis. Explore Case.
Indiana
Feb 2015
Buquer, et al. v. City of Indianapolis

Immigrants' Rights

Buquer, et al. v. City of Indianapolis

On May 25, 2011 the 桃子视频 of Indiana, the ACLU鈥檚 Immigrants鈥 Rights Project, and the National Immigration Law Center (NILC). filed a class action lawsuit challenging a discriminatory Indiana law inspired by Arizona鈥檚 notorious SB 1070. According to the lawsuit, the law unlawfully authorizes police to make warrantless arrests of individuals based on assumed immigration status and criminalizes the mere use or acceptance of the commonly used consular ID card. The groups charged that the law would lead to racial profiling and trample upon the rights of all Indiana residents in violation of the U.S. Constitution.
Buquer, Et Al. V. City Of Indianapolis. Explore Case.
Lowcountry Immigration Coalition, et al. v. Nikki Haley
South Carolina
Feb 2015

Immigrants' Rights

Lowcountry Immigration Coalition, et al. v. Nikki Haley

In 2011 South Carolina passed SB 20, a law modeled after Arizona鈥檚 notorious SB 1070. The law required police to demand papers demonstrating citizenship or immigration status during traffic stops based on reasonable suspicion that a person lacks legal status. It also criminalized South Carolinians for everyday interactions with undocumented individuals, such as driving someone to church, or renting a room to a friend.
Explore case
Lowcountry Immigration Coalition, Et Al. V. Nikki Haley. Explore Case.
South Carolina
Feb 2015
Lowcountry Immigration Coalition, et al. v. Nikki Haley

Immigrants' Rights

Lowcountry Immigration Coalition, et al. v. Nikki Haley

In 2011 South Carolina passed SB 20, a law modeled after Arizona鈥檚 notorious SB 1070. The law required police to demand papers demonstrating citizenship or immigration status during traffic stops based on reasonable suspicion that a person lacks legal status. It also criminalized South Carolinians for everyday interactions with undocumented individuals, such as driving someone to church, or renting a room to a friend.
Lowcountry Immigration Coalition, Et Al. V. Nikki Haley. Explore Case.
2324
25
2627...