Criminal Law Reform

Featured

Arizona
Oct 2023
Fund for Empowerment v. Phoenix, City of

Criminal Law Reform

Racial Justice

Fund for Empowerment v. Phoenix, City of

Fund for Empowerment is a challenge to the City of Phoenix’s practice of conducting sweeps of encampments without notice, issuing citations to unsheltered people for camping and sleeping on public property when they have no place else to go, and confiscating and destroying their property without notice or process.
Fund For Empowerment V. Phoenix, City Of. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2023
McElrath v. Georgia

Criminal Law Reform

McElrath v. Georgia

Does the Double Jeopardy Clause bar an appellate court from reviewing and setting aside a jury’s verdicts of acquittal on the ground that the verdict is inconsistent with the jury’s verdict on other charges?
Mcelrath V. Georgia. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2023
Pulsifer v. United States

Criminal Law Reform

Pulsifer v. United States

This case involves the interpretation of a federal law that allows defendants to avoid mandatory minimum sentences for certain nonviolent drug crimes, allowing judges to impose sentences tailored to their individual circumstances.
Pulsifer V. United States. Explore Case.
Texas
Jul 2021
Sanchez et al v. Dallas County Sheriff et al

Criminal Law Reform

Prisoners' Rights

Sanchez et al v. Dallas County Sheriff et al

Decarceration has always been an emergency, a life and death proposition, but COVID-19 makes this effort intensely urgent. The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµhas been working with our partners to litigate for the rights of those who are incarcerated and cannot protect themselves because of the policies of the institutions in which they are jailed.
Sanchez Et Al V. Dallas County Sheriff Et Al. Explore Case.

All Cases

157 Criminal Law Reform Cases

Missouri
Sep 2013

Criminal Law Reform

Smart Justice

Barrett v. Claycomb

A federal district court has ruled that a public college in Missouri must end its unconstitutional program of requiring all of its students—irrespective of their course of study—to submit to suspicionless drug-testing.
Explore case
Barrett V. Claycomb. Explore Case.
Missouri
Sep 2013

Criminal Law Reform

Smart Justice

Barrett v. Claycomb

A federal district court has ruled that a public college in Missouri must end its unconstitutional program of requiring all of its students—irrespective of their course of study—to submit to suspicionless drug-testing.
Barrett V. Claycomb. Explore Case.
police officers with dog enter home to search it
Court Case
Sep 2013

Criminal Law Reform

John Doe, Jane Doe, and James Doe v. Todd Entrekin

The Etowah County Sheriff’s Department has subjected a family in Alabama to an ongoing series of unannounced, random, and suspicionless inspections of their home, threatening the family with arrest if they fail to cooperate.
Explore case
John Doe, Jane Doe, And James Doe V. Todd Entrekin. Explore Case.
Court Case
Sep 2013
police officers with dog enter home to search it

Criminal Law Reform

John Doe, Jane Doe, and James Doe v. Todd Entrekin

The Etowah County Sheriff’s Department has subjected a family in Alabama to an ongoing series of unannounced, random, and suspicionless inspections of their home, threatening the family with arrest if they fail to cooperate.
John Doe, Jane Doe, And James Doe V. Todd Entrekin. Explore Case.
Kansas v. Cheever
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2013

Criminal Law Reform

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Kansas v. Cheever

Whether the Fifth Amendment imposes any limits on the state's ability to introduce evidence derived from a court-ordered psychiatric examination of the defendant by the state's expert.
Explore case
Kansas V. Cheever. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2013
Kansas v. Cheever

Criminal Law Reform

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Kansas v. Cheever

Whether the Fifth Amendment imposes any limits on the state's ability to introduce evidence derived from a court-ordered psychiatric examination of the defendant by the state's expert.
Kansas V. Cheever. Explore Case.
DNA
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2013

Criminal Law Reform

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Maryland v. King

Whether collecting and analyzing DNA samples from arrestees without a warrant or consent violates the Fourth Amendment.
Explore case
Maryland V. King. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2013
DNA

Criminal Law Reform

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Maryland v. King

Whether collecting and analyzing DNA samples from arrestees without a warrant or consent violates the Fourth Amendment.
Maryland V. King. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2013

Criminal Law Reform

Smart Justice

Missouri v. McNeely

Whether every person arrested for drunk driving can be forced to submit to a blood test without consent and without a warrant.
Explore case
Missouri V. Mcneely. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2013

Criminal Law Reform

Smart Justice

Missouri v. McNeely

Whether every person arrested for drunk driving can be forced to submit to a blood test without consent and without a warrant.
Missouri V. Mcneely. Explore Case.
2324
25
2627...