Reproductive Freedom

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2024
Idaho and Moyle, et al. v. United States

Reproductive Freedom

Idaho and Moyle, et al. v. United States

Idaho and Moyle, et al. v. United States was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court by Idaho politicians seeking to disregard a federal statute 鈥 the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) 鈥 and put doctors in jail for providing pregnant patients necessary emergency medical care. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on this case on April 24, 2024. The Court鈥檚 ultimate decision will impact access to this essential care across the country.
Idaho And Moyle, Et Al. V. United States. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2023
Danco Laboratories, LLC, v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine; U.S. FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine

Reproductive Freedom

Danco Laboratories, LLC, v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine; U.S. FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine

The 桃子视频 joined over 200 reproductive health, rights, and justice organizations in an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in support of an emergency request to stay a decision issued by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals that severely restricted the use of mifepristone 鈥 a medication used in most abortions in this country 鈥 and threatened the innovation of new drugs and the ability of Americans to access lifesaving drugs.
Danco Laboratories, Llc, V. Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine; U.s. Fda V. Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2022
Bans Off Our Bodies Protest Sign

Reproductive Freedom

Dobbs v. Jackson Women鈥檚 Health Organization

The case concerns the constitutionality of a Mississippi law prohibiting abortions after the fifteenth week of pregnancy. The state used the case as a vehicle to ask the Supreme Court to take away the federal constitutional right to abortion it first recognized 50 years before in Roe v. Wade. On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States accepted the state鈥檚 invitation and overturned Roe eliminating the federal constitutional right to abortion.
Dobbs V. Jackson Women鈥檚 Health Organization. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2022
RFP attorneys Alexa Kolbi-Molinas and Andrew Beck heading towards the Supreme Court to argue the case.

Reproductive Freedom

Cameron v. EMW Women鈥檚 Surgical Center

In 2018, the 桃子视频 and the 桃子视频of Kentucky filed a suit on behalf of Kentucky abortion providers and their patients challenging a state law banning physicians from providing a safe and medically proven abortion method called dilation and evacuation, or 鈥淒&E.鈥 If it were to take effect, this law would prevent many patients from being able to obtain an abortion altogether. After two courts held that the law is unconstitutional, the Supreme Court ruled in March 2022 that Kentucky Attorney General Cameron can continue his pursuit to push abortion out of reach by intervening in the underlying challenge to an abortion ban, which is proceeding in a lower court.
Cameron V. Emw Women鈥檚 Surgical Center. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021
Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson

Reproductive Freedom

Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson

The 桃子视频, the 桃子视频of Texas, and coalition partners filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of abortion providers and funds on July 13, 2021, challenging S.B. 8, a Texas law allowing private citizens to enforce a ban on abortion as early as six weeks in pregnancy鈥攂efore many know they are pregnant. The ACLU鈥檚 challenge made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court three times in as many months. After hearing oral arguments in the case, the Court issued a decision on December 10, 2021, that ended the most promising pathways to blocking the ban. The Supreme Court鈥檚 decision makes it more difficult to obtain adequate relief from the courts and gives states the green light to ban abortion using bounty-hunting schemes. Texas鈥 abortion ban will remain in effect until relief can be secured from a court.
Whole Woman's Health V. Jackson. Explore Case.

All Cases

121 Reproductive Freedom Cases

American Academy of Pediatrics et al. v. Clovis Unified School District
Court Case
Sep 2012

Reproductive Freedom

LGBTQ Rights

American Academy of Pediatrics et al. v. Clovis Unified School District

Two parents and the Gay-Straight Alliance Network join the AAP in a suit against Clovis Unified School District over abstinence-only-until-marriage sex education in the district's high schools. The lawsuit charges that the district is violating California law and putting teens' health at risk by giving students misinformation and denying them critical instruction about condoms and contraception.
Explore case
American Academy Of Pediatrics Et Al. V. Clovis Unified School District. Explore Case.
Court Case
Sep 2012
American Academy of Pediatrics et al. v. Clovis Unified School District

Reproductive Freedom

LGBTQ Rights

American Academy of Pediatrics et al. v. Clovis Unified School District

Two parents and the Gay-Straight Alliance Network join the AAP in a suit against Clovis Unified School District over abstinence-only-until-marriage sex education in the district's high schools. The lawsuit charges that the district is violating California law and putting teens' health at risk by giving students misinformation and denying them critical instruction about condoms and contraception.
American Academy Of Pediatrics Et Al. V. Clovis Unified School District. Explore Case.
Planned Parenthood v. Betlach
Court Case
Jul 2012

Reproductive Freedom

Planned Parenthood v. Betlach

Planned Parenthood and the 桃子视频 filed a lawsuit challenging an Arizona law that blocks Planned Parenthood from providing family services to Arizonans enrolled in Medicaid. The law is designed to penalize Planned Parenthood because they provide abortions, though they do so without federal dollars.
Explore case
Planned Parenthood V. Betlach. Explore Case.
Court Case
Jul 2012
Planned Parenthood v. Betlach

Reproductive Freedom

Planned Parenthood v. Betlach

Planned Parenthood and the 桃子视频 filed a lawsuit challenging an Arizona law that blocks Planned Parenthood from providing family services to Arizonans enrolled in Medicaid. The law is designed to penalize Planned Parenthood because they provide abortions, though they do so without federal dollars.
Planned Parenthood V. Betlach. Explore Case.
In Re: Initiative Petition No. 395, State Question No. 761 or The Oklahoma Personhood Ballot Initiative
Oklahoma
Mar 2012

Reproductive Freedom

In Re: Initiative Petition No. 395, State Question No. 761 or The Oklahoma Personhood Ballot Initiative

The 桃子视频, the 桃子视频of Oklahoma and the Center for Reproductive Rights have filed a lawsuit on behalf of six Oklahoma voters -- including women's health providers -- against an Oklahoma ballot initiative that would ban vital health services by granting fertilized eggs and embryos the same constitutional rights as people.
Explore case
In Re: Initiative Petition No. 395, State Question No. 761 Or The Oklahoma Personhood Ballot Initiative. Explore Case.
Oklahoma
Mar 2012
In Re: Initiative Petition No. 395, State Question No. 761 or The Oklahoma Personhood Ballot Initiative

Reproductive Freedom

In Re: Initiative Petition No. 395, State Question No. 761 or The Oklahoma Personhood Ballot Initiative

The 桃子视频, the 桃子视频of Oklahoma and the Center for Reproductive Rights have filed a lawsuit on behalf of six Oklahoma voters -- including women's health providers -- against an Oklahoma ballot initiative that would ban vital health services by granting fertilized eggs and embryos the same constitutional rights as people.
In Re: Initiative Petition No. 395, State Question No. 761 Or The Oklahoma Personhood Ballot Initiative. Explore Case.
Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri & Dodge City Family Planning Clinic v. Sam Brownback, et al
Court Case
Feb 2012

Reproductive Freedom

Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri & Dodge City Family Planning Clinic v. Sam Brownback, et al

The 桃子视频 and the 桃子视频of Kansas and Western-Missouri have filed a lawsuit against a state law restricting Title X funding in violation of the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
Explore case
Planned Parenthood Of Kansas And Mid-missouri & Dodge City Family Planning Clinic V. Sam Brownback, Et Al. Explore Case.
Court Case
Feb 2012
Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri & Dodge City Family Planning Clinic v. Sam Brownback, et al

Reproductive Freedom

Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri & Dodge City Family Planning Clinic v. Sam Brownback, et al

The 桃子视频 and the 桃子视频of Kansas and Western-Missouri have filed a lawsuit against a state law restricting Title X funding in violation of the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
Planned Parenthood Of Kansas And Mid-missouri & Dodge City Family Planning Clinic V. Sam Brownback, Et Al. Explore Case.
Arizona Coalition Against Domestic Violence vs. Arizona Department of Revenue
Court Case
Dec 2011

Reproductive Freedom

Arizona Coalition Against Domestic Violence vs. Arizona Department of Revenue

The 桃子视频, the 桃子视频of Arizona and the Arizona Coalition Against Domestic Violence (AzCADV) have filed a First Amendment challenge to an Arizona law that would exclude any nonprofit organization that provides abortion referrals or counseling from receiving donations through the state’s Working Poor Tax Credit Program. This law is part of a larger trend nationwide to punish those organizations that support women’s reproductive decisionmaking.
Explore case
Arizona Coalition Against Domestic Violence Vs. Arizona Department Of Revenue. Explore Case.
Court Case
Dec 2011
Arizona Coalition Against Domestic Violence vs. Arizona Department of Revenue

Reproductive Freedom

Arizona Coalition Against Domestic Violence vs. Arizona Department of Revenue

The 桃子视频, the 桃子视频of Arizona and the Arizona Coalition Against Domestic Violence (AzCADV) have filed a First Amendment challenge to an Arizona law that would exclude any nonprofit organization that provides abortion referrals or counseling from receiving donations through the state’s Working Poor Tax Credit Program. This law is part of a larger trend nationwide to punish those organizations that support women’s reproductive decisionmaking.
Arizona Coalition Against Domestic Violence Vs. Arizona Department Of Revenue. Explore Case.
1920
21
2223...