Free Speech

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2023
Molina v. Book

Free Speech

Molina v. Book

Whether police officers violated clearly established First Amendment rights when they tear-gassed plaintiffs for serving as legal observers in a public protest.
Molina V. Book. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2023
O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier and Lindke v. Freed

Free Speech

O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier and Lindke v. Freed

The ACLU, the Ƶof Northern California, and the Ƶof Southern California filed amicus briefs in support of everyday people fighting for government transparency and accountability in two cases set for review by the U.S. Supreme Court this Term: O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier and Lindke v. Freed.
O’connor-ratcliff V. Garnier And Lindke V. Freed. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2021
Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.

Free Speech

Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.

On September 25, 2017, the ACLU-PA filed suit on behalf of B.L., a high school sophomore who has been cheerleading since she was in fifth grade and was expelled from the team as punishment for out-of-school speech.
Mahanoy Area School District V. B.l.. Explore Case.

All Cases

158 Free Speech Cases

Arkansas Times LP v. Waldrip
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2019

Free Speech

Arkansas Times LP v. Waldrip

This lawsuit asserts that Arkansas’ Act 710, which requires government contractors to certify that they are not participating in boycotts of Israel or “Israeli-controlled territories,” violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments.
Explore case
Arkansas Times Lp V. Waldrip. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2019
Arkansas Times LP v. Waldrip

Free Speech

Arkansas Times LP v. Waldrip

This lawsuit asserts that Arkansas’ Act 710, which requires government contractors to certify that they are not participating in boycotts of Israel or “Israeli-controlled territories,” violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments.
Arkansas Times Lp V. Waldrip. Explore Case.
Dakota Rural Action v. Noem
South Dakota
Mar 2019

Free Speech

Racial Justice

Dakota Rural Action v. Noem

The Ƶand Ƶof South Dakota have filed a federal lawsuit challenging three South Dakota laws that target full-throated advocacy and protest.
Explore case
Dakota Rural Action V. Noem. Explore Case.
South Dakota
Mar 2019
Dakota Rural Action v. Noem

Free Speech

Racial Justice

Dakota Rural Action v. Noem

The Ƶand Ƶof South Dakota have filed a federal lawsuit challenging three South Dakota laws that target full-throated advocacy and protest.
Dakota Rural Action V. Noem. Explore Case.
Nieves v. Bartlett, 17-1174
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2019

Free Speech

Criminal Law Reform

Nieves v. Bartlett, 17-1174

Whether a plaintiff who claims that a police officer retaliated against his First Amendment-protected expression by arresting him for a misdemeanor is barred from suing if the police had probable cause for his arrest.
Explore case
Nieves V. Bartlett, 17-1174. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2019
Nieves v. Bartlett, 17-1174

Free Speech

Criminal Law Reform

Nieves v. Bartlett, 17-1174

Whether a plaintiff who claims that a police officer retaliated against his First Amendment-protected expression by arresting him for a misdemeanor is barred from suing if the police had probable cause for his arrest.
Nieves V. Bartlett, 17-1174. Explore Case.
Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck, 17‐1702
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2019

Free Speech

Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck, 17‐1702

Whether the private operator of a public access channel in New York City is a state actor, and therefore bound by the First Amendment, for the purpose of selecting and scheduling its broadcasts, where federal, state, and city laws and policies so strictly circumscribe its content decisions that all independent editorial judgment is displaced.
Explore case
Manhattan Community Access Corp. V. Halleck, 17‐1702. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2019
Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck, 17‐1702

Free Speech

Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck, 17‐1702

Whether the private operator of a public access channel in New York City is a state actor, and therefore bound by the First Amendment, for the purpose of selecting and scheduling its broadcasts, where federal, state, and city laws and policies so strictly circumscribe its content decisions that all independent editorial judgment is displaced.
Manhattan Community Access Corp. V. Halleck, 17‐1702. Explore Case.
Robert Frese
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2018

Free Speech

Frese v. Formella – Challenge to New Hampshire Criminal Defamation Law

In December 2018, the Ƶfiled a lawsuit challenging New Hampshire’s law against criminal defamation on behalf of a man arrested for insulting police online.
Explore case
Frese V. Formella – Challenge To New Hampshire Criminal Defamation Law. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2018
Robert Frese

Free Speech

Frese v. Formella – Challenge to New Hampshire Criminal Defamation Law

In December 2018, the Ƶfiled a lawsuit challenging New Hampshire’s law against criminal defamation on behalf of a man arrested for insulting police online.
Frese V. Formella – Challenge To New Hampshire Criminal Defamation Law. Explore Case.
1718
19
2021...