Featured

Missouri
Feb 2026
A briefcase of a Census taker.

Voting Rights

Missouri v. U.S. Department of Commerce

A coalition of civil rights and immigrant-rights organizations has moved to intervene as defendants in a lawsuit that threatens to dismantle the Constitution鈥檚 long-standing requirement that the decennial census count all people living in the United States. Missouri asks the court to exclude undocumented immigrants and people living in the country on temporary visas from the census count used to determine congressional representation鈥攁n unprecedented move that would upend more than two centuries of constitutional practice.
Missouri V. U.s. Department Of Commerce. Explore Case.
Mississippi
Dec 2025
Mississippi

Voting Rights

White v. Mississippi State Board of Elections

District lines used to elect Mississippi鈥檚 Supreme Court have gone unchanged for more than 35 years. We鈥檙e suing because the current lines crack the Mississippi Delta and dilute the voting strength of Black Mississippians in state Supreme Court elections, in violation of the Voting Rights Act.
White V. Mississippi State Board Of Elections. Explore Case.
Court Case
Dec 2025
FOIA Case Seeking the Trump Administration鈥檚 Legal Justification for Deadly Boat Strikes

National Security

Human Rights

FOIA Case Seeking the Trump Administration鈥檚 Legal Justification for Deadly Boat Strikes

The Department of Justice鈥檚 Office of Legal Counsel (鈥淥LC鈥) authored a legal opinion that reportedly claims to justify the Trump administration鈥檚 illegal lethal strikes on civilians in boats in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean. Media reports indicate that, in addition to claiming that the strikes are lawful acts in an alleged 鈥渁rmed conflict鈥 with unspecified drug cartels, the OLC opinion also purports to immunize personnel who authorized or took part in the strikes from future criminal prosecution. Because the public deserves to know how our government is justifying these illegal strikes, and why they think the people who carried them out should not be held accountable, the 桃子视频is seeking immediate release of the OLC legal opinion and related documents pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act.
Foia Case Seeking The Trump Administration鈥檚 Legal Justification For Deadly Boat Strikes. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2025
A collage image featuring an image of the Supreme Court and an image of a young girl waving an American flag.

Immigrants' Rights

Barbara v. Donald J. Trump

President Trump is attempting to undermine the promise of birthright citizenship to children born on U.S. soil. But the 桃子视频and partners are fighting to protect the rights of citizens that are plainly stated in the Constitution, federal statute, and reaffirmed by the Supreme Court for more than a century. We鈥檙e arguing against the Trump administration in the Supreme Court and are confident we will win.
Barbara V. Donald J. Trump. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2025
Alabama on a map of the United States of America

Voting Rights

Racial Justice

Allen v. Milligan

Whether Alabama鈥檚 congressional districts violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act because they discriminate against Black voters. We succeeded in winning a new map for 2024 elections which, for the first time, has two congressional district that provide Black voters a fair opportunity to elect candidates of their choosing despite multiple attempts by Alabama to stop us at the Supreme Court. Despite this win, Alabama is still defending its discriminatory map, and a trial was held in February 2025 to determine the map for the rest of the decade. In May 2025, a federal court ruled that Alabama's 2023 congressional map both violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and was enacted by the Alabama Legislature with racially discriminatory intent.
Allen V. Milligan. Explore Case.
Washington, D.C.
Oct 2025
trump

Voting Rights

League of Women Voters Education Fund v. Trump

On March 25, 2025, in a sweeping and unprecedented Executive Order, President Trump attempted to usurp the power to regulate federal elections from Congress and the States. Among other things, the Executive Order directs the Election Assistance Commission鈥攁n agency that Congress specifically established to be bipartisan and independent鈥攖o require voters to show a passport or other citizenship documentation in order to register to vote in federal elections. If implemented, the Executive Order would threaten the ability of millions of eligible Americans to register and vote and upend the administration of federal elections. On behalf of leading voter registration organizations and advocacy organizations, the 桃子视频and co-counsel filed a lawsuit to block the Executive Order as an unconstitutional power grab.
League Of Women Voters Education Fund V. Trump. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Oct 2025
Mississippi

Voting Rights

State Board of Election Commissioners v. Mississippi State Conference of the NAACP

Mississippi has a growing Black population, which is already the largest Black population percentage of any state in the country. Yet. Black Mississippians continue to be significantly under-represented in the state legislature, as Mississippi鈥檚 latest districting maps fail to reflect the reality of the state鈥檚 changing demographics. During the 2022 redistricting process, the Mississippi legislature refused to create any new districts where Black voters have a chance to elect their preferred representative. The current district lines therefore dilute the voting power of Black Mississippians and continue to deprive them of political representation that is responsive to their needs and concerns, including severe disparities in education and healthcare.
State Board Of Election Commissioners V. Mississippi State Conference Of The Naacp. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Oct 2025
Louisiana

Voting Rights

Louisiana v. Callais (Callais v. Landry)

Whether the congressional map Louisiana adopted to cure a Voting Rights Act violation in Robinson v. Ardoin is itself unlawful as a gerrymander.
Louisiana V. Callais (callais V. Landry). Explore Case.
Missouri
Sep 2025
A close up of an "I Voted" sticker.

Voting Rights

Wise v. Missouri

In unprecedented fashion, the State of Missouri has redrawn the district lines used for electing members of Congress for a second time this decade. These new district lines are gerrymandered and will harm political representation for all Missourians, particularly Black residents in Kansas City, who have been divided along racial lines.
Wise V. Missouri. Explore Case.

All Cases

1,678 Court Cases

Commonwealth v. Davis and Commonwealth v. Kentucky Education Association
Kentucky Supreme Court
Dec 2025

Civil Liberties

Commonwealth v. Davis and Commonwealth v. Kentucky Education Association

This case asks whether Kentucky鈥檚 legislature can legally favor some unions by giving them preferential treatment and disfavor others. A recent law does just that: SB 7 prohibits public employers from allowing their employees to use payroll deductions for union dues yet expressly exempts law enforcement and fire protection unions from this prohibition. Two state circuit courts and the Court of Appeals have held that this law violates the Kentucky Constitution鈥檚 equal protection guarantee. The State now appeals to the Kentucky Supreme Court. The Court鈥檚 decision has important implications for equal protection, free speech, and labor rights in Kentucky.
Explore case
Commonwealth V. Davis And Commonwealth V. Kentucky Education Association. Explore Case.
Kentucky Supreme Court
Dec 2025
Commonwealth v. Davis and Commonwealth v. Kentucky Education Association

Civil Liberties

Commonwealth v. Davis and Commonwealth v. Kentucky Education Association

This case asks whether Kentucky鈥檚 legislature can legally favor some unions by giving them preferential treatment and disfavor others. A recent law does just that: SB 7 prohibits public employers from allowing their employees to use payroll deductions for union dues yet expressly exempts law enforcement and fire protection unions from this prohibition. Two state circuit courts and the Court of Appeals have held that this law violates the Kentucky Constitution鈥檚 equal protection guarantee. The State now appeals to the Kentucky Supreme Court. The Court鈥檚 decision has important implications for equal protection, free speech, and labor rights in Kentucky.
Commonwealth V. Davis And Commonwealth V. Kentucky Education Association. Explore Case.
U.S. DOGE Service Access to Sensitive Agency Records Systems Multiagency FOIA
Court Case
Dec 2025

Privacy & Technology

U.S. DOGE Service Access to Sensitive Agency Records Systems Multiagency FOIA

There are serious privacy concerns raised by reports that the United States DOGE (鈥淒epartment of Government Efficiency鈥) Service (鈥淯SDS鈥) has gained access to federal agency systems, including those housing sensitive information like federal payment data, student loan data or federal employee records, and may be using artificial intelligence technology in analyzing them. The 桃子视频submitted a FOIA request to more than 40 federal agencies to provide the public with information on what federal records the agencies have provided to or been asked for by the USDS and if sensitive information and key decision-making has been outsourced to unvetted technology.
Explore case
U.s. Doge Service Access To Sensitive Agency Records Systems Multiagency Foia. Explore Case.
Court Case
Dec 2025
U.S. DOGE Service Access to Sensitive Agency Records Systems Multiagency FOIA

Privacy & Technology

U.S. DOGE Service Access to Sensitive Agency Records Systems Multiagency FOIA

There are serious privacy concerns raised by reports that the United States DOGE (鈥淒epartment of Government Efficiency鈥) Service (鈥淯SDS鈥) has gained access to federal agency systems, including those housing sensitive information like federal payment data, student loan data or federal employee records, and may be using artificial intelligence technology in analyzing them. The 桃子视频submitted a FOIA request to more than 40 federal agencies to provide the public with information on what federal records the agencies have provided to or been asked for by the USDS and if sensitive information and key decision-making has been outsourced to unvetted technology.
U.s. Doge Service Access To Sensitive Agency Records Systems Multiagency Foia. Explore Case.
A sign that says "vote here" among a line of voters.
North Carolina
Nov 2025

Voting Rights

North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP v. Berger

In 2023, North Carolina legislators enacted a congressional map that diluted the voice and voting power of Black North Carolinians. Plaintiffs sued to enjoin that map. After a trial on the merits, North Carolina engaged in unprecedented mid-decade redistricting to target Black voters in Congressional District 1.
Explore case
North Carolina State Conference Of The Naacp V. Berger. Explore Case.
North Carolina
Nov 2025
A sign that says "vote here" among a line of voters.

Voting Rights

North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP v. Berger

In 2023, North Carolina legislators enacted a congressional map that diluted the voice and voting power of Black North Carolinians. Plaintiffs sued to enjoin that map. After a trial on the merits, North Carolina engaged in unprecedented mid-decade redistricting to target Black voters in Congressional District 1.
North Carolina State Conference Of The Naacp V. Berger. Explore Case.
Oregon voting
Oregon
Nov 2025

Voting Rights

United States v. Oregon (Amicus)

Representing the 桃子视频of Oregon, the 桃子视频Voting Rights Project and the 桃子视频of Oregon filed an amicus brief in a federal lawsuit over the federal government鈥檚 demand that Oregon turn over its entire voter registration rolls, including with voters鈥 sensitive personal data such as drivers鈥 license numbers and partial social security numbers.
Explore case
United States V. Oregon (amicus). Explore Case.
Oregon
Nov 2025
Oregon voting

Voting Rights

United States v. Oregon (Amicus)

Representing the 桃子视频of Oregon, the 桃子视频Voting Rights Project and the 桃子视频of Oregon filed an amicus brief in a federal lawsuit over the federal government鈥檚 demand that Oregon turn over its entire voter registration rolls, including with voters鈥 sensitive personal data such as drivers鈥 license numbers and partial social security numbers.
United States V. Oregon (amicus). Explore Case.
A demonstrator (with only their hands visible) holds up a sign that reads " FREE SPEECH, FREE COUNTRY - ACLU".
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2025

Free Speech

Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment

In a brief spearheaded by leading copyright scholars Rebecca Tushnet (Harvard Law), Mark Lemley (Stanford Law), and Chris Springman (NYU Law), the ACLU, the 桃子视频of Virginia, and the Center for Democracy and Technology filed a friend-of-the-court brief with the Supreme Court in Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment. In this significant copyright case, the Supreme Court will review a 4th Circuit ruling holding that an internet service provider could be liable for vast copyright damages because it took insufficient steps to disconnect IP addresses accused of downloading copyrighted material. The case is at the Supreme Court on the merits docket, with oral arguments scheduled for Monday, December 1, 2025.
Explore case
Cox Communications, Inc. V. Sony Music Entertainment. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2025
A demonstrator (with only their hands visible) holds up a sign that reads " FREE SPEECH, FREE COUNTRY - ACLU".

Free Speech

Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment

In a brief spearheaded by leading copyright scholars Rebecca Tushnet (Harvard Law), Mark Lemley (Stanford Law), and Chris Springman (NYU Law), the ACLU, the 桃子视频of Virginia, and the Center for Democracy and Technology filed a friend-of-the-court brief with the Supreme Court in Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment. In this significant copyright case, the Supreme Court will review a 4th Circuit ruling holding that an internet service provider could be liable for vast copyright damages because it took insufficient steps to disconnect IP addresses accused of downloading copyrighted material. The case is at the Supreme Court on the merits docket, with oral arguments scheduled for Monday, December 1, 2025.
Cox Communications, Inc. V. Sony Music Entertainment. Explore Case.
1617
18
1920...