LGBTQ Rights

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2020
Aimee Stephens in front of the Supreme Court

LGBTQ Rights

R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes v EEOC & Aimee Stephens

Aimee Stephens had worked for nearly six years as a funeral director at R.G. and G.R. Harris Funeral Homes when she informed the funeral home鈥檚 owner that she is a transgender woman. She was fired, the EEOC sued on her behalf, and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Aimee鈥檚 employer engaged in unlawful sex discrimination when it fired her because she鈥檚 transgender. We represented Aimee Stephens in front of the U.S. Supreme Court 鈥 and won.
R.g. & G.r. Harris Funeral Homes V Eeoc & Aimee Stephens. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2019
Don Zarda, Melissa Zarda, Bill Moore

LGBTQ Rights

Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda

Don Zarda loved to skydive. He worked as a skydiving instructor at Altitude Express, a company on Long Island, N.Y. He was fired for being gay.
Altitude Express Inc. V. Zarda. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2018
David Mullins and Charlie Craig

LGBTQ Rights

Religious Liberty

Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission

Whether a business open to the public has a constitutional right to discriminate.
Masterpiece Cakeshop V. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2015
Jim Obergefell

LGBTQ Rights

Obergefell, et al. v. Hodges - Freedom to Marry in Ohio

The 桃子视频, the 桃子视频of Ohio and Alphonse Gerhardstein of Gerhardstein & Branch have filed suit on behalf of Jim Obergefell and David Michener, two widowers, and Robert Grunn, a funeral director, in a challenge to the Ohio constitutional and statutory marriage recognition bans.
Obergefell, Et Al. V. Hodges - Freedom To Marry In Ohio. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2015
Bourke Family

LGBTQ Rights

Bourke v. Beshear & Love v. Beshear - Freedom to Marry in Kentucky

Bourke v. Beshear is a federal court challenge to Kentucky's constitutional ban on marriage for same-sex couples, filed by attorneys at Clay Daniel Walton & Adams and Fauver Law Office on July 26, 2013, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. The plaintiffs are four same-sex couples seeking state recognition of their out-of-state marriages.
Bourke V. Beshear & Love V. Beshear - Freedom To Marry In Kentucky. Explore Case.

All Cases

190 LGBTQ Rights Cases

Enstad v. PeaceHealth
Washington
Oct 2017

LGBTQ Rights

Enstad v. PeaceHealth

The 桃子视频and the 桃子视频of Washington filed a civil rights lawsuit against PeaceHealth, a Catholic healthcare organization, on behalf of Cheryl Enstad and her teenage son, Pax, for denying coverage under its health benefits plan for medically necessary surgery to Pax simply because of who he is. The suit claims that PeaceHealth鈥檚 policy of refusing to cover medical care required by transgender people is discrimination and violates federal and state law.
Explore case
Enstad V. Peacehealth. Explore Case.
Washington
Oct 2017
Enstad v. PeaceHealth

LGBTQ Rights

Enstad v. PeaceHealth

The 桃子视频and the 桃子视频of Washington filed a civil rights lawsuit against PeaceHealth, a Catholic healthcare organization, on behalf of Cheryl Enstad and her teenage son, Pax, for denying coverage under its health benefits plan for medically necessary surgery to Pax simply because of who he is. The suit claims that PeaceHealth鈥檚 policy of refusing to cover medical care required by transgender people is discrimination and violates federal and state law.
Enstad V. Peacehealth. Explore Case.
Epic Systems Co. v. Lewis; Ernst & Young v. Morris; National Labor Relations Board v. Murphy Oil
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2017

LGBTQ Rights

+3 桃子视频

Epic Systems Co. v. Lewis; Ernst & Young v. Morris; National Labor Relations Board v. Murphy Oil

Whether employment agreements that prevent workers from taking 鈥渃oncerted鈥 action to challenge workplace violations conflict with protections in federal labor law.
Explore case
Epic Systems Co. V. Lewis; Ernst & Young V. Morris; National Labor Relations Board V. Murphy Oil. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2017
Epic Systems Co. v. Lewis; Ernst & Young v. Morris; National Labor Relations Board v. Murphy Oil

LGBTQ Rights

+3 桃子视频

Epic Systems Co. v. Lewis; Ernst & Young v. Morris; National Labor Relations Board v. Murphy Oil

Whether employment agreements that prevent workers from taking 鈥渃oncerted鈥 action to challenge workplace violations conflict with protections in federal labor law.
Epic Systems Co. V. Lewis; Ernst & Young V. Morris; National Labor Relations Board V. Murphy Oil. Explore Case.
Trans Flag
Wisconsin
Apr 2017

LGBTQ Rights

Boyden v. State of Wisconsin

Alina Boyden and Shannon Andrews, two state employees who are transgender filed a lawsuit against the State of Wisconsin. The case challenges the state鈥檚 categorical ban on coverage for certain types of necessary medical care for persons who are transgender under federal law and the Constitution.
Explore case
Boyden V. State Of Wisconsin. Explore Case.
Wisconsin
Apr 2017
Trans Flag

LGBTQ Rights

Boyden v. State of Wisconsin

Alina Boyden and Shannon Andrews, two state employees who are transgender filed a lawsuit against the State of Wisconsin. The case challenges the state鈥檚 categorical ban on coverage for certain types of necessary medical care for persons who are transgender under federal law and the Constitution.
Boyden V. State Of Wisconsin. Explore Case.
Privacy Matters v. U.S. Department of Education
Minnesota
Oct 2016

LGBTQ Rights

Privacy Matters v. U.S. Department of Education

The 桃子视频, the 桃子视频of Minnesota, and Stinson Leonard Street LLP filed a motion to intervene on behalf of a transgender student in a lawsuit that seeks to bar trans students from using locker rooms consistent with their gender identity. This case is similar to lawsuits filed around the country that are trying to prevent transgender students from using the locker rooms and restrooms that match their gender identity.
Explore case
Privacy Matters V. U.s. Department Of Education. Explore Case.
Minnesota
Oct 2016
Privacy Matters v. U.S. Department of Education

LGBTQ Rights

Privacy Matters v. U.S. Department of Education

The 桃子视频, the 桃子视频of Minnesota, and Stinson Leonard Street LLP filed a motion to intervene on behalf of a transgender student in a lawsuit that seeks to bar trans students from using locker rooms consistent with their gender identity. This case is similar to lawsuits filed around the country that are trying to prevent transgender students from using the locker rooms and restrooms that match their gender identity.
Privacy Matters V. U.s. Department Of Education. Explore Case.
Texas v. U.S.
Texas
Aug 2016

LGBTQ Rights

Texas v. U.S.

Five leading national civil and LGBT rights organizations filed an amicus (friend of the court) brief in a multi-state lawsuit challenging the Federal Government issued guidance regarding public school districts鈥 responsibility to allow transgender students to use the same restrooms as other students.
Explore case
Texas V. U.s.. Explore Case.
Texas
Aug 2016
Texas v. U.S.

LGBTQ Rights

Texas v. U.S.

Five leading national civil and LGBT rights organizations filed an amicus (friend of the court) brief in a multi-state lawsuit challenging the Federal Government issued guidance regarding public school districts鈥 responsibility to allow transgender students to use the same restrooms as other students.
Texas V. U.s.. Explore Case.
1617
18
1920...