Criminal Law Reform

Featured

Arizona
Oct 2023
Fund for Empowerment v. Phoenix, City of

Criminal Law Reform

Racial Justice

Fund for Empowerment v. Phoenix, City of

Fund for Empowerment is a challenge to the City of Phoenix’s practice of conducting sweeps of encampments without notice, issuing citations to unsheltered people for camping and sleeping on public property when they have no place else to go, and confiscating and destroying their property without notice or process.
Fund For Empowerment V. Phoenix, City Of. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2023
McElrath v. Georgia

Criminal Law Reform

McElrath v. Georgia

Does the Double Jeopardy Clause bar an appellate court from reviewing and setting aside a jury’s verdicts of acquittal on the ground that the verdict is inconsistent with the jury’s verdict on other charges?
Mcelrath V. Georgia. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2023
Pulsifer v. United States

Criminal Law Reform

Pulsifer v. United States

This case involves the interpretation of a federal law that allows defendants to avoid mandatory minimum sentences for certain nonviolent drug crimes, allowing judges to impose sentences tailored to their individual circumstances.
Pulsifer V. United States. Explore Case.
Texas
Jul 2021
Sanchez et al v. Dallas County Sheriff et al

Criminal Law Reform

Prisoners' Rights

Sanchez et al v. Dallas County Sheriff et al

Decarceration has always been an emergency, a life and death proposition, but COVID-19 makes this effort intensely urgent. The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµhas been working with our partners to litigate for the rights of those who are incarcerated and cannot protect themselves because of the policies of the institutions in which they are jailed.
Sanchez Et Al V. Dallas County Sheriff Et Al. Explore Case.

All Cases

157 Criminal Law Reform Cases

Cross v. SFPD
California
Oct 2019

Criminal Law Reform

Cross v. SFPD

Our Constitution promises all people, regardless of their race, equal protection under the laws. Accordingly, courts have long recognized that the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause prohibits selective enforcement of criminal laws based on race. Yet law enforcement officers of the City of San Francisco have repeatedly violated that clause, singling out Black people for enforcement.
Explore case
Cross V. Sfpd. Explore Case.
California
Oct 2019
Cross v. SFPD

Criminal Law Reform

Cross v. SFPD

Our Constitution promises all people, regardless of their race, equal protection under the laws. Accordingly, courts have long recognized that the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause prohibits selective enforcement of criminal laws based on race. Yet law enforcement officers of the City of San Francisco have repeatedly violated that clause, singling out Black people for enforcement.
Cross V. Sfpd. Explore Case.
Brown v. Madison County
Mississippi
Oct 2019

Criminal Law Reform

Brown v. Madison County

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Mississippi, the ACLU, and the law firm Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP filed a federal lawsuit against the Madison County Sheriff’s Department to challenge its decades-old policing practices that employ unconstitutional, racially-motivated tactics that target the Black community.
Explore case
Brown V. Madison County. Explore Case.
Mississippi
Oct 2019
Brown v. Madison County

Criminal Law Reform

Brown v. Madison County

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Mississippi, the ACLU, and the law firm Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP filed a federal lawsuit against the Madison County Sheriff’s Department to challenge its decades-old policing practices that employ unconstitutional, racially-motivated tactics that target the Black community.
Brown V. Madison County. Explore Case.
Bairefoot v. City of Beaufort et al
South Carolina
Oct 2019

Criminal Law Reform

Smart Justice

Bairefoot v. City of Beaufort et al

In South Carolina’s municipal courts today, defendants are prosecuted, convicted, and jailed without ever having a lawyer appointed to their case or even being advised of their right to counsel. Hundreds of these defendants who were deprived of counsel—including Tina Bairefoot, Dae’Quandrea Nelson, and Nathan Fox—have been and are incarcerated in local jails and state prisons every year. Cities and towns can decide whether they have municipal courts—they are optional—but if they decide to have them they must follow the Constitution, which includes the right to counsel.
Explore case
Bairefoot V. City Of Beaufort Et Al. Explore Case.
South Carolina
Oct 2019
Bairefoot v. City of Beaufort et al

Criminal Law Reform

Smart Justice

Bairefoot v. City of Beaufort et al

In South Carolina’s municipal courts today, defendants are prosecuted, convicted, and jailed without ever having a lawyer appointed to their case or even being advised of their right to counsel. Hundreds of these defendants who were deprived of counsel—including Tina Bairefoot, Dae’Quandrea Nelson, and Nathan Fox—have been and are incarcerated in local jails and state prisons every year. Cities and towns can decide whether they have municipal courts—they are optional—but if they decide to have them they must follow the Constitution, which includes the right to counsel.
Bairefoot V. City Of Beaufort Et Al. Explore Case.
Police Officer Back
U.S. Supreme Court
Oct 2019

Criminal Law Reform

Torres v. Madrid

Whether the Fourth Amendment applies to a police officer's intentional use of physical force against a fleeing person, if that use of force does not succeed in terminating her movement.
Explore case
Torres V. Madrid. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Oct 2019
Police Officer Back

Criminal Law Reform

Torres v. Madrid

Whether the Fourth Amendment applies to a police officer's intentional use of physical force against a fleeing person, if that use of force does not succeed in terminating her movement.
Torres V. Madrid. Explore Case.
Ross V. Blount
Court Case
Oct 2019

Criminal Law Reform

Smart Justice

Ross V. Blount

Explore case
Ross V. Blount. Explore Case.
Court Case
Oct 2019
Ross V. Blount

Criminal Law Reform

Smart Justice

Ross V. Blount

Ross V. Blount. Explore Case.
1516
17
1819...