Free Speech

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2023
Molina v. Book

Free Speech

Molina v. Book

Whether police officers violated clearly established First Amendment rights when they tear-gassed plaintiffs for serving as legal observers in a public protest.
Molina V. Book. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2023
O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier and Lindke v. Freed

Free Speech

O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier and Lindke v. Freed

The ACLU, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Northern California, and the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Southern California filed amicus briefs in support of everyday people fighting for government transparency and accountability in two cases set for review by the U.S. Supreme Court this Term: O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier and Lindke v. Freed.
O’connor-ratcliff V. Garnier And Lindke V. Freed. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2021
Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.

Free Speech

Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.

On September 25, 2017, the ACLU-PA filed suit on behalf of B.L., a high school sophomore who has been cheerleading since she was in fifth grade and was expelled from the team as punishment for out-of-school speech.
Mahanoy Area School District V. B.l.. Explore Case.

All Cases

158 Free Speech Cases

Bongo Productions LLC et al v. Lawrence et al
Tennessee
Sep 2022

Free Speech

LGBTQ Rights

Bongo Productions LLC et al v. Lawrence et al

Two businesses owners in Tennessee are challenging a new, first-of-its-kind Tennessee law that would require businesses and other entities that open their facilities to the public and allow transgender people to use the restroom that matches their gender to post a government-prescribed warning sign. The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµand the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Tennessee filed the lawsuit in federal court and claim it violates the First Amendment rights of the business owners.
Explore case
Bongo Productions Llc Et Al V. Lawrence Et Al. Explore Case.
Tennessee
Sep 2022
Bongo Productions LLC et al v. Lawrence et al

Free Speech

LGBTQ Rights

Bongo Productions LLC et al v. Lawrence et al

Two businesses owners in Tennessee are challenging a new, first-of-its-kind Tennessee law that would require businesses and other entities that open their facilities to the public and allow transgender people to use the restroom that matches their gender to post a government-prescribed warning sign. The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµand the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Tennessee filed the lawsuit in federal court and claim it violates the First Amendment rights of the business owners.
Bongo Productions Llc Et Al V. Lawrence Et Al. Explore Case.
Arizona Broadcasters Association v. Brnovich
Court Case
Sep 2022

Free Speech

Arizona Broadcasters Association v. Brnovich

On August 23, 2022, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ of Arizona and a group of 10 media organizations, represented by the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµand Ballard Spahr, respectively, filed a lawsuit against the state of Arizona challenging HB 2319, a law which makes it a crime to record police officers within eight feet of law enforcement activity.
Explore case
Arizona Broadcasters Association V. Brnovich. Explore Case.
Court Case
Sep 2022
Arizona Broadcasters Association v. Brnovich

Free Speech

Arizona Broadcasters Association v. Brnovich

On August 23, 2022, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ of Arizona and a group of 10 media organizations, represented by the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµand Ballard Spahr, respectively, filed a lawsuit against the state of Arizona challenging HB 2319, a law which makes it a crime to record police officers within eight feet of law enforcement activity.
Arizona Broadcasters Association V. Brnovich. Explore Case.
Code
Court Case
Aug 2022

Free Speech

Privacy & Technology

NAACP v. Kohn

The ACLU, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof South Carolina, and the NAACP have filed a lawsuit on behalf of the South Carolina NAACP challenging the South Carolina Court Administration's categorical ban on automated data collection, known as scraping, on the Public Index. The South Carolina NAACP seeks to scrape eviction records to identify tenants in proceedings and conduct outreach to provide services to them. The ban on scraping violates South Carolina NAACP’s First Amendment right to access and record public court records, impairing South Carolina NAACP's ability to prevent evictions and help people achieve meaningful access to the courts.
Explore case
Naacp V. Kohn. Explore Case.
Court Case
Aug 2022
Code

Free Speech

Privacy & Technology

NAACP v. Kohn

The ACLU, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof South Carolina, and the NAACP have filed a lawsuit on behalf of the South Carolina NAACP challenging the South Carolina Court Administration's categorical ban on automated data collection, known as scraping, on the Public Index. The South Carolina NAACP seeks to scrape eviction records to identify tenants in proceedings and conduct outreach to provide services to them. The ban on scraping violates South Carolina NAACP’s First Amendment right to access and record public court records, impairing South Carolina NAACP's ability to prevent evictions and help people achieve meaningful access to the courts.
Naacp V. Kohn. Explore Case.
An ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµbookmark sticking out of a book.
Virginia
Jun 2022

Free Speech

Virginia Obscenity Proceedings Against Two Books

On June 22, 2022, our clients—local bookstores Prince Books, Read Books, One More Page Books, and bbgb tales for kids, as well as American Booksellers for Free Expression, Association of American Publishers, Inc., Authors Guild, Inc., American Library Association, Virginia Library Association, and Freedom to Read Foundation—filed motions seeking to dismiss obscenity proceedings against two books, highlighting the unconstitutional nature of the proceedings and noting that the books are not obscene as a matter of law.
Explore case
Virginia Obscenity Proceedings Against Two Books. Explore Case.
Virginia
Jun 2022
An ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµbookmark sticking out of a book.

Free Speech

Virginia Obscenity Proceedings Against Two Books

On June 22, 2022, our clients—local bookstores Prince Books, Read Books, One More Page Books, and bbgb tales for kids, as well as American Booksellers for Free Expression, Association of American Publishers, Inc., Authors Guild, Inc., American Library Association, Virginia Library Association, and Freedom to Read Foundation—filed motions seeking to dismiss obscenity proceedings against two books, highlighting the unconstitutional nature of the proceedings and noting that the books are not obscene as a matter of law.
Virginia Obscenity Proceedings Against Two Books. Explore Case.
Shurtleff v. City of Boston
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2022

Free Speech

Shurtleff v. City of Boston

For more than a decade, Boston has allowed nearly 300 private groups to temporarily fly their flags outside of City Hall. Did the city violate the First Amendment when it denied Camp Constitution’s request to fly its flag for a single hour because the flag has a religious symbol?
Explore case
Shurtleff V. City Of Boston. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2022
Shurtleff v. City of Boston

Free Speech

Shurtleff v. City of Boston

For more than a decade, Boston has allowed nearly 300 private groups to temporarily fly their flags outside of City Hall. Did the city violate the First Amendment when it denied Camp Constitution’s request to fly its flag for a single hour because the flag has a religious symbol?
Shurtleff V. City Of Boston. Explore Case.
1213
14
1516...