National Security

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2023
Outside Federal Bureau of Investigation Headquarters

National Security

FBI v. Fikre

Whether the government can overcome the voluntary cessation exception to mootness by removing an individual from the No Fly List when the government has not repudiated its decision to place him on the List and remains free to return him to the List for the same reasons and using the same procedures he alleges were unlawful.
Fbi V. Fikre. Explore Case.
Florida
Nov 2023
Students for Justice in Palestine at the University of Florida v. Raymond Rodrigues

National Security

+2 Ƶ

Students for Justice in Palestine at the University of Florida v. Raymond Rodrigues

The University of Florida chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine filed a lawsuit on November 16, 2023, challenging the Chancellor of the State University System of Florida’s order to state universities to deactivate the student group. This order threatens the students’ constitutionally-protected right to free speech and association in violation of the First Amendment. The Ƶand its partners are seeking a preliminary injunction that would bar the Chancellor and the University of Florida from deactivating the UF SJP.
Students For Justice In Palestine At The University Of Florida V. Raymond Rodrigues. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2022
FBI v. Fazaga Plaintiffs

National Security

+2 Ƶ

FBI v. Fazaga

In a case scheduled to be argued before the U.S. Supreme Court on November 8, 2021, three Muslim Americans are challenging the FBI’s secret spying on them and their communities based on their religion, in violation of the Constitution and federal law. In what will likely be a landmark case, the plaintiffs — Yassir Fazaga, Ali Uddin Malik, and Yasser Abdelrahim — insist that the FBI cannot escape accountability for violating their religious freedom by invoking “state secrets.” The plaintiffs are represented by the Center for Immigration Law and Policy at UCLA School of Law, the Ƶof Southern California, the Ƶ, the Council for American Islamic Relations, and the law firm of Hadsell Stormer Renick & Dai.
Fbi V. Fazaga. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2021
Trump Declaring National Emergency

National Security

Immigrants' Rights

Sierra Club v. Trump — Challenge to Trump’s National Emergency Declaration to Construct a Border Wall

In February 2019, the Ƶfiled a lawsuit challenging President Trump’s emergency powers declaration to secure funds to build a wall along the southern border. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition. The lawsuit argues that the president is usurping Congress’s appropriations power and threatening the clearly defined separation of powers inscribed in the Constitution. On January 20, 2021, President Biden halted further border wall construction. Litigation in this and subsequent related challenges has been paused or deadlines extended while the ACLU’s clients and the Biden administration determine next steps.
Sierra Club V. Trump — Challenge To Trump’s National Emergency Declaration To Construct A Border Wall. Explore Case.
Indiana
Oct 2016
Exodus Refugee Immigration, Inc. v. Mike Pence, et al

National Security

Immigrants' Rights

Exodus Refugee Immigration, Inc. v. Mike Pence, et al

The Ƶ and the Ƶof Indiana, on behalf of Exodus Refugee Immigration, filed suit against Governor Mike Pence and the secretary of the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration to stop attempts to suspend resettlement of Syrian refugees, claiming the governor’s actions violate the United States Constitution and federal law.
Exodus Refugee Immigration, Inc. V. Mike Pence, Et Al. Explore Case.

All Cases

155 National Security Cases

NSA headquarters
Court Case
Jan 2017

National Security

Ƶv. NSA – FOIA Lawsuit Seeking Records of Government Use of Section 702 of FISA

Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act permits warrantless surveillance of Americans’ international communications, and the government has used that authority to seize and search the personal communications of Americans and others on an immense scale. In September 2016, the Ƶsubmitted a Freedom of Information Act request to several government agencies seeking basic information about how the government conducts surveillance under Section 702. In November 2016, we filed a lawsuit to enforce the request in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Explore case
Aclu V. Nsa – Foia Lawsuit Seeking Records Of Government Use Of Section 702 Of Fisa. Explore Case.
Court Case
Jan 2017
NSA headquarters

National Security

Ƶv. NSA – FOIA Lawsuit Seeking Records of Government Use of Section 702 of FISA

Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act permits warrantless surveillance of Americans’ international communications, and the government has used that authority to seize and search the personal communications of Americans and others on an immense scale. In September 2016, the Ƶsubmitted a Freedom of Information Act request to several government agencies seeking basic information about how the government conducts surveillance under Section 702. In November 2016, we filed a lawsuit to enforce the request in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Aclu V. Nsa – Foia Lawsuit Seeking Records Of Government Use Of Section 702 Of Fisa. Explore Case.
Drone
Court Case
Dec 2016

National Security

Ƶv. DOJ - FOIA Case for Records Relating to Killing of Three U.S. Citizens

In October 2011, the Ƶsubmitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request seeking information about the killings of three U.S. citizens in Yemen: Anwar al-Aulaqi; his 16-year-old son, Abdulrahman al-Aulaqi; and Samir Kahn. Over five years of litigation, this case was appealed to the Second Circuit three times. The government acknowledged it had killed the three Americans, and was forced to describe targeted-killing program documents in its possession. The Ƶwon an important victory in securing the release of a memorandum in which the government set out its legal justification for killing Anwar al-Aulaqi in June 2014. In December 2016, the Second Circuit ruled that no other documents must be disclosed, concluding this litigation. The Ƶcontinues to seek additional details about the targeted killing program’s rules and consequences through other FOIA requests and cases.
Explore case
Aclu V. Doj - Foia Case For Records Relating To Killing Of Three U.s. Citizens. Explore Case.
Court Case
Dec 2016
Drone

National Security

Ƶv. DOJ - FOIA Case for Records Relating to Killing of Three U.S. Citizens

In October 2011, the Ƶsubmitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request seeking information about the killings of three U.S. citizens in Yemen: Anwar al-Aulaqi; his 16-year-old son, Abdulrahman al-Aulaqi; and Samir Kahn. Over five years of litigation, this case was appealed to the Second Circuit three times. The government acknowledged it had killed the three Americans, and was forced to describe targeted-killing program documents in its possession. The Ƶwon an important victory in securing the release of a memorandum in which the government set out its legal justification for killing Anwar al-Aulaqi in June 2014. In December 2016, the Second Circuit ruled that no other documents must be disclosed, concluding this litigation. The Ƶcontinues to seek additional details about the targeted killing program’s rules and consequences through other FOIA requests and cases.
Aclu V. Doj - Foia Case For Records Relating To Killing Of Three U.s. Citizens. Explore Case.
Drone
Court Case
Dec 2016

National Security

Ƶv. CIA - FOIA Case for Records Relating to Drone Killings

In a Freedom of Information Act request filed on January 13, 2010, the Ƶasked the government to disclose the legal and factual basis for its use of predator drones to conduct targeted killings overseas. In particular, the Ƶsought to find out when, where, and against whom drone strikes can be authorized, and how the United States ensures compliance with international laws relating to extrajudicial killings.
Explore case
Aclu V. Cia - Foia Case For Records Relating To Drone Killings. Explore Case.
Court Case
Dec 2016
Drone

National Security

Ƶv. CIA - FOIA Case for Records Relating to Drone Killings

In a Freedom of Information Act request filed on January 13, 2010, the Ƶasked the government to disclose the legal and factual basis for its use of predator drones to conduct targeted killings overseas. In particular, the Ƶsought to find out when, where, and against whom drone strikes can be authorized, and how the United States ensures compliance with international laws relating to extrajudicial killings.
Aclu V. Cia - Foia Case For Records Relating To Drone Killings. Explore Case.
NSA Building
Court Case
Dec 2016

National Security

Smith v. Obama – Challenge to NSA Mass Call-Tracking Program

The Ƶhas joined a lawsuit brought by an Idaho nurse challenging the constitutionality of the National Security Agency’s mass collection of Americans' phone records.
Explore case
Smith V. Obama – Challenge To Nsa Mass Call-tracking Program. Explore Case.
Court Case
Dec 2016
NSA Building

National Security

Smith v. Obama – Challenge to NSA Mass Call-Tracking Program

The Ƶhas joined a lawsuit brought by an Idaho nurse challenging the constitutionality of the National Security Agency’s mass collection of Americans' phone records.
Smith V. Obama – Challenge To Nsa Mass Call-tracking Program. Explore Case.
Ƶv. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons
Court Case
Nov 2016

National Security

Prisoners' Rights

Ƶv. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons

The Ƶ filed suit against the federal Bureau of Prisons for refusing to fulfill a Freedom of Information Act request for documents related to its officials’ visit in 2002 to a CIA detention site in Afghanistan, their positive assessment of the conditions, and the training they provided to the site’s administrators. Code-named COBALT and also called “the Salt Pit,” the site held people suspected of terrorism, and they were tortured there, according to the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee’s torture report that was declassified in 2014.
Explore case
Aclu V. Department Of Justice, Bureau Of Prisons. Explore Case.
Court Case
Nov 2016
Ƶv. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons

National Security

Prisoners' Rights

Ƶv. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons

The Ƶ filed suit against the federal Bureau of Prisons for refusing to fulfill a Freedom of Information Act request for documents related to its officials’ visit in 2002 to a CIA detention site in Afghanistan, their positive assessment of the conditions, and the training they provided to the site’s administrators. Code-named COBALT and also called “the Salt Pit,” the site held people suspected of terrorism, and they were tortured there, according to the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee’s torture report that was declassified in 2014.
Aclu V. Department Of Justice, Bureau Of Prisons. Explore Case.
1112
13
1415...