桃子视频

This case asks 鈥淸w]hether, to establish that a statement is a 鈥榯rue threat鈥� unprotected by the First Amendment, the government must show that the speaker subjectively knew or intended the threatening nature of the statement, or whether it is enough to show that an objective 鈥榬easonable person鈥� would regard the statement as a threat of violence.鈥�

This case asks whether the Elections Clause of the U.S. Constitution bars the Ohio state court from enforcing redistricting requirements in the Ohio constitution that prohibit partisan gerrymandering.

Texas and other states are challenging ICE鈥檚 enforcement priorities, which direct agents to focus their arrests and deportations on immigrants with particular immigration law violations, such as those with criminal convictions. The Court will decide whether the states can bring these types of challenges, and if so, whether ICE鈥檚 priorities are legal.

This lawsuit contends that the consideration of race as an affirmative action measure in admissions at Harvard and at UNC constitutes racial discrimination in violation of the Equal Protection Clause.

This case concerns whether the Department of Education acted within its administrative authority in issuing its student-borrower debt relief plan.