Reproductive Freedom

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2024
Idaho and Moyle, et al. v. United States

Reproductive Freedom

Idaho and Moyle, et al. v. United States

Idaho and Moyle, et al. v. United States was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court by Idaho politicians seeking to disregard a federal statute 鈥 the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) 鈥 and put doctors in jail for providing pregnant patients necessary emergency medical care. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on this case on April 24, 2024. The Court鈥檚 ultimate decision will impact access to this essential care across the country.
Idaho And Moyle, Et Al. V. United States. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2023
Danco Laboratories, LLC, v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine; U.S. FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine

Reproductive Freedom

Danco Laboratories, LLC, v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine; U.S. FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine

The 桃子视频 joined over 200 reproductive health, rights, and justice organizations in an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in support of an emergency request to stay a decision issued by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals that severely restricted the use of mifepristone 鈥 a medication used in most abortions in this country 鈥 and threatened the innovation of new drugs and the ability of Americans to access lifesaving drugs.
Danco Laboratories, Llc, V. Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine; U.s. Fda V. Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2022
Bans Off Our Bodies Protest Sign

Reproductive Freedom

Dobbs v. Jackson Women鈥檚 Health Organization

The case concerns the constitutionality of a Mississippi law prohibiting abortions after the fifteenth week of pregnancy. The state used the case as a vehicle to ask the Supreme Court to take away the federal constitutional right to abortion it first recognized 50 years before in Roe v. Wade. On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States accepted the state鈥檚 invitation and overturned Roe eliminating the federal constitutional right to abortion.
Dobbs V. Jackson Women鈥檚 Health Organization. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2022
RFP attorneys Alexa Kolbi-Molinas and Andrew Beck heading towards the Supreme Court to argue the case.

Reproductive Freedom

Cameron v. EMW Women鈥檚 Surgical Center

In 2018, the 桃子视频 and the 桃子视频of Kentucky filed a suit on behalf of Kentucky abortion providers and their patients challenging a state law banning physicians from providing a safe and medically proven abortion method called dilation and evacuation, or 鈥淒&E.鈥 If it were to take effect, this law would prevent many patients from being able to obtain an abortion altogether. After two courts held that the law is unconstitutional, the Supreme Court ruled in March 2022 that Kentucky Attorney General Cameron can continue his pursuit to push abortion out of reach by intervening in the underlying challenge to an abortion ban, which is proceeding in a lower court.
Cameron V. Emw Women鈥檚 Surgical Center. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021
Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson

Reproductive Freedom

Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson

The 桃子视频, the 桃子视频of Texas, and coalition partners filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of abortion providers and funds on July 13, 2021, challenging S.B. 8, a Texas law allowing private citizens to enforce a ban on abortion as early as six weeks in pregnancy鈥攂efore many know they are pregnant. The ACLU鈥檚 challenge made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court three times in as many months. After hearing oral arguments in the case, the Court issued a decision on December 10, 2021, that ended the most promising pathways to blocking the ban. The Supreme Court鈥檚 decision makes it more difficult to obtain adequate relief from the courts and gives states the green light to ban abortion using bounty-hunting schemes. Texas鈥 abortion ban will remain in effect until relief can be secured from a court.
Whole Woman's Health V. Jackson. Explore Case.

All Cases

121 Reproductive Freedom Cases

Planned Parenthood South Atlantic et. al. v. Moore et. al.
North Carolina
Sep 2020

Reproductive Freedom

Planned Parenthood South Atlantic et. al. v. Moore et. al.

Abortion providers in North Carolina and SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective filed litigation on September 3, 2020, challenging several medically unnecessary abortion restrictions that have pushed abortion out of reach in the state and stigmatized essential health care.
Explore case
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic Et. Al. V. Moore Et. Al.. Explore Case.
North Carolina
Sep 2020
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic et. al. v. Moore et. al.

Reproductive Freedom

Planned Parenthood South Atlantic et. al. v. Moore et. al.

Abortion providers in North Carolina and SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective filed litigation on September 3, 2020, challenging several medically unnecessary abortion restrictions that have pushed abortion out of reach in the state and stigmatized essential health care.
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic Et. Al. V. Moore Et. Al.. Explore Case.
Adams & Boyle, P.C. et al. v. Slatery et al.
Court Case
Apr 2020

Reproductive Freedom

Women's Rights

Adams & Boyle, P.C. et al. v. Slatery et al.

Tennessee is one of several state to use the guise of the COVID-19 pandemic to advance anti-abortion policies. On April 24, 2020, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a preliminary injunction granted by a lower court to allow patients to continue to receive abortion care after 11 of weeks of pregnancy
Explore case
Adams & Boyle, P.c. Et Al. V. Slatery Et Al.. Explore Case.
Court Case
Apr 2020
Adams & Boyle, P.C. et al. v. Slatery et al.

Reproductive Freedom

Women's Rights

Adams & Boyle, P.C. et al. v. Slatery et al.

Tennessee is one of several state to use the guise of the COVID-19 pandemic to advance anti-abortion policies. On April 24, 2020, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a preliminary injunction granted by a lower court to allow patients to continue to receive abortion care after 11 of weeks of pregnancy
Adams & Boyle, P.c. Et Al. V. Slatery Et Al.. Explore Case.
Women鈥檚 Health Center of West Virginia v. Morrisey et al.
West Virginia
Apr 2020

Reproductive Freedom

Women's Rights

Women鈥檚 Health Center of West Virginia v. Morrisey et al.

On April 25, 2020, the 桃子视频, the 桃子视频of West Virginia, and the law firm of WilmerHale filed an emergency lawsuit on behalf of the Women鈥檚 Health Center of West Virginia and its patients to prevent the state of West Virginia from restricting abortion access during the coronavirus pandemic.
Explore case
Women鈥檚 Health Center Of West Virginia V. Morrisey Et Al.. Explore Case.
West Virginia
Apr 2020
Women鈥檚 Health Center of West Virginia v. Morrisey et al.

Reproductive Freedom

Women's Rights

Women鈥檚 Health Center of West Virginia v. Morrisey et al.

On April 25, 2020, the 桃子视频, the 桃子视频of West Virginia, and the law firm of WilmerHale filed an emergency lawsuit on behalf of the Women鈥檚 Health Center of West Virginia and its patients to prevent the state of West Virginia from restricting abortion access during the coronavirus pandemic.
Women鈥檚 Health Center Of West Virginia V. Morrisey Et Al.. Explore Case.
Planned Parenthood of Maryland, Inc., et al. v. Azar, et al.
Court Case
Feb 2020

Reproductive Freedom

Planned Parenthood of Maryland, Inc., et al. v. Azar, et al.

In December 2019, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released a new rule that, if implemented, would force insurance companies that sell plans in the Affordable Care Act individual marketplaces to send two separate bills to customers 鈥 one for the coverage of abortion care, and another for coverage of other health care.
Explore case
Planned Parenthood Of Maryland, Inc., Et Al. V. Azar, Et Al.. Explore Case.
Court Case
Feb 2020
Planned Parenthood of Maryland, Inc., et al. v. Azar, et al.

Reproductive Freedom

Planned Parenthood of Maryland, Inc., et al. v. Azar, et al.

In December 2019, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released a new rule that, if implemented, would force insurance companies that sell plans in the Affordable Care Act individual marketplaces to send two separate bills to customers 鈥 one for the coverage of abortion care, and another for coverage of other health care.
Planned Parenthood Of Maryland, Inc., Et Al. V. Azar, Et Al.. Explore Case.
FemHealth USA Inc. v. City of Mount Juliet
Tennessee
Jan 2020

Reproductive Freedom

FemHealth USA Inc. v. City of Mount Juliet

The ACLU, along with the 桃子视频of Tennessee and 桃子视频of Tennessee, and the law firm of Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, is bringing suit against the city of Mt. Juliet, Tennessee ver a zoning ordinance that bans the provision of surgical abortion care within the city limits.
Explore case
Femhealth Usa Inc. V. City Of Mount Juliet. Explore Case.
Tennessee
Jan 2020
FemHealth USA Inc. v. City of Mount Juliet

Reproductive Freedom

FemHealth USA Inc. v. City of Mount Juliet

The ACLU, along with the 桃子视频of Tennessee and 桃子视频of Tennessee, and the law firm of Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, is bringing suit against the city of Mt. Juliet, Tennessee ver a zoning ordinance that bans the provision of surgical abortion care within the city limits.
Femhealth Usa Inc. V. City Of Mount Juliet. Explore Case.
1011
12
1314...