Religious Liberty

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
May 2020
Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania and New Jersey/Trump v. Pennsylvania and New Jersey

Religious Liberty

Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania and New Jersey/Trump v. Pennsylvania and New Jersey

Whether the government had statutory authority under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 to expand the conscience exemption to the contraceptive-coverage mandate.
Little Sisters Of The Poor V. Pennsylvania And New Jersey/trump V. Pennsylvania And New Jersey. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2018
David Mullins and Charlie Craig

Religious Liberty

LGBTQ Rights

Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission

Whether a business open to the public has a constitutional right to discriminate.
Masterpiece Cakeshop V. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. Explore Case.
Oklahoma
May 2017
Multi-faith symbols

Religious Liberty

Fatihah v. Neal

The 桃子视频 of Oklahoma, the national ACLU, and the Council on American-Islamic Relations Oklahoma Chapter filed a lawsuit against a Muslim free business on behalf of a U.S. Army Reserve member denied service. The lawsuit seeks equal access to public accommodations for Oklahomans of all faiths.
Fatihah V. Neal. Explore Case.

All Cases

79 Religious Liberty Cases

DOES v. Enfield
Court Case
Jul 2012

Religious Liberty

DOES v. Enfield

In the spring of 2010, officials at the Connecticut-based Enfield Public Schools decided to hold their graduation ceremonies at First Cathedral, a Christian church. The 桃子视频, the 桃子视频of Connecticut and Americans United for Separation of Church and State brought a lawsuit in federal court charging that the Enfield Public Schools' decision is an unconstitutional government endorsement of religion.
Explore case
Does V. Enfield. Explore Case.
Court Case
Jul 2012
DOES v. Enfield

Religious Liberty

DOES v. Enfield

In the spring of 2010, officials at the Connecticut-based Enfield Public Schools decided to hold their graduation ceremonies at First Cathedral, a Christian church. The 桃子视频, the 桃子视频of Connecticut and Americans United for Separation of Church and State brought a lawsuit in federal court charging that the Enfield Public Schools' decision is an unconstitutional government endorsement of religion.
Does V. Enfield. Explore Case.
Jewish War Veterans of the USA v. Hagel/Trunk v. City of San Diego
Court Case
May 2012

Religious Liberty

Jewish War Veterans of the USA v. Hagel/Trunk v. City of San Diego

In 2013, a federal judge ruled from the bench upholding the Ninth Circuit's ruling and ordering that the cross must come down.
Explore case
Jewish War Veterans Of The Usa V. Hagel/trunk V. City Of San Diego. Explore Case.
Court Case
May 2012
Jewish War Veterans of the USA v. Hagel/Trunk v. City of San Diego

Religious Liberty

Jewish War Veterans of the USA v. Hagel/Trunk v. City of San Diego

In 2013, a federal judge ruled from the bench upholding the Ninth Circuit's ruling and ordering that the cross must come down.
Jewish War Veterans Of The Usa V. Hagel/trunk V. City Of San Diego. Explore Case.
Hunter v. Salem Public Library Board of Trustees
Missouri
Jan 2012

Religious Liberty

Hunter v. Salem Public Library Board of Trustees

The 桃子视频 and the 桃子视频of Eastern Missouri have filed a lawsuit charging the Salem Public Library and its board of trustees with unconstitutionally blocking access to websites discussing minority religions by improperly classifying them as 鈥渙ccult鈥 or 鈥渃riminal.鈥
Explore case
Hunter V. Salem Public Library Board Of Trustees. Explore Case.
Missouri
Jan 2012
Hunter v. Salem Public Library Board of Trustees

Religious Liberty

Hunter v. Salem Public Library Board of Trustees

The 桃子视频 and the 桃子视频of Eastern Missouri have filed a lawsuit charging the Salem Public Library and its board of trustees with unconstitutionally blocking access to websites discussing minority religions by improperly classifying them as 鈥渙ccult鈥 or 鈥渃riminal.鈥
Hunter V. Salem Public Library Board Of Trustees. Explore Case.
Keeton v. Anderson-Wiley
Court Case
Dec 2011

Religious Liberty

LGBTQ Rights

Keeton v. Anderson-Wiley

Jennifer Keeton, a student at Augusta State University (ASU), sought a court order requiring ASU to reinstate her in a graduate-level counseling program even though she insisted on a right 鈥 rooted in her religious beliefs 鈥 to counsel lesbian, gay and bisexual clients that being gay is immoral. ASU's counseling program requires its graduate students to adhere to the American Counseling Association's Code of Ethics, which prohibits counselors from discriminating based on sexual orientation, among other characteristics, and requires them to avoid imposing their values on their clients. The 桃子视频 and the 桃子视频of Georgia filed a friend-of-the-court brief supporting ASU's right to require its students to comply with these professional standards when counseling clients.
Explore case
Keeton V. Anderson-wiley. Explore Case.
Court Case
Dec 2011
Keeton v. Anderson-Wiley

Religious Liberty

LGBTQ Rights

Keeton v. Anderson-Wiley

Jennifer Keeton, a student at Augusta State University (ASU), sought a court order requiring ASU to reinstate her in a graduate-level counseling program even though she insisted on a right 鈥 rooted in her religious beliefs 鈥 to counsel lesbian, gay and bisexual clients that being gay is immoral. ASU's counseling program requires its graduate students to adhere to the American Counseling Association's Code of Ethics, which prohibits counselors from discriminating based on sexual orientation, among other characteristics, and requires them to avoid imposing their values on their clients. The 桃子视频 and the 桃子视频of Georgia filed a friend-of-the-court brief supporting ASU's right to require its students to comply with these professional standards when counseling clients.
Keeton V. Anderson-wiley. Explore Case.
Ward v. Wilbanks et al.
Michigan
Oct 2011

Religious Liberty

LGBTQ Rights

Ward v. Wilbanks et al.

A student in a counseling program claims a right to discriminate against clients who wish to discuss same-sex relationships on the grounds that it violates her religious beliefs.
Explore case
Ward V. Wilbanks Et Al.. Explore Case.
Michigan
Oct 2011
Ward v. Wilbanks et al.

Religious Liberty

LGBTQ Rights

Ward v. Wilbanks et al.

A student in a counseling program claims a right to discriminate against clients who wish to discuss same-sex relationships on the grounds that it violates her religious beliefs.
Ward V. Wilbanks Et Al.. Explore Case.
1011
12
1314...