Racial Justice

Featured

Arizona
Oct 2023
Fund for Empowerment v. Phoenix, City of

Racial Justice

Criminal Law Reform

Fund for Empowerment v. Phoenix, City of

Fund for Empowerment is a challenge to the City of Phoenix鈥檚 practice of conducting sweeps of encampments without notice, issuing citations to unsheltered people for camping and sleeping on public property when they have no place else to go, and confiscating and destroying their property without notice or process.
Fund For Empowerment V. Phoenix, City Of. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2023
United States v. Rahimi

Racial Justice

Women's Rights

United States v. Rahimi

Whether 18 U.S.C. 搂 922(g)(8), which prohibits the possession of firearms by persons subject to domestic-violence restraining orders, violates the Second Amendment on its face.
United States V. Rahimi. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2023
Muldrow v. City of St. Louis

Racial Justice

Muldrow v. City of St. Louis

Do employees claiming that they have been denied a transfer because of their race have to demonstrate in addition that the transfer caused a significant material disadvantage?
Muldrow V. City Of St. Louis. Explore Case.
Court Case
Jun 2020
Defy Ventures, Inc. v. Small Business Administration

Racial Justice

Defy Ventures, Inc. v. Small Business Administration

Suing the Trump administration to lift its unlawful exclusion of businesses owned by people with criminal records from being eligible for Paycheck Protection Act funds
Defy Ventures, Inc. V. Small Business Administration. Explore Case.
California
Mar 2019
Protester holding "#Black Lives Matter" sign

Racial Justice

MediaJustice, et al. v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, et al.

On March 21, 2019, the 桃子视频 and MediaJustice, formerly known as Center for Media Justice, filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit seeking records about FBI targeting of Black activists. The lawsuit enforces the 桃子视频and MediaJustice鈥檚 right to information about a 2017 FBI Intelligence Assessment that asserts, without evidence, that a group of so-called 鈥淏lack Identity Extremists鈥 poses a threat of domestic terrorism. The Intelligence Assessment was widely disseminated to law enforcement agencies nationwide, raising public concern about government surveillance of Black people and Black-led organizations based on anti-Black stereotypes and First Amendment protected activities.
Mediajustice, Et Al. V. Federal Bureau Of Investigation, Et Al.. Explore Case.
Court Case
Aug 2015
S.R. v. Kenton County Sheriff's Office

Racial Justice

Disability Rights

S.R. v. Kenton County Sheriff's Office

A deputy sheriff shackled two elementary school children who have disabilities, causing them pain and trauma, according to a federal lawsuit filed today by the 桃子视频, the Children's Law Center, and Dinsmore & Shohl.
S.r. V. Kenton County Sheriff's Office. Explore Case.

All Cases

129 Racial Justice Cases

Janus v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 31
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2018

Racial Justice

+2 桃子视频

Janus v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 31

Whether it violates the First Amendment for a state to authorize a public employee union to collect a fee from non-members for the cost of benefits that the union is legally required to provide all employees.
Explore case
Janus V. American Federation Of State, County And Municipal Employees, Council 31. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2018
Janus v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 31

Racial Justice

+2 桃子视频

Janus v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 31

Whether it violates the First Amendment for a state to authorize a public employee union to collect a fee from non-members for the cost of benefits that the union is legally required to provide all employees.
Janus V. American Federation Of State, County And Municipal Employees, Council 31. Explore Case.
Epic Systems Co. v. Lewis; Ernst & Young v. Morris; National Labor Relations Board v. Murphy Oil
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2017

Racial Justice

+3 桃子视频

Epic Systems Co. v. Lewis; Ernst & Young v. Morris; National Labor Relations Board v. Murphy Oil

Whether employment agreements that prevent workers from taking 鈥渃oncerted鈥 action to challenge workplace violations conflict with protections in federal labor law.
Explore case
Epic Systems Co. V. Lewis; Ernst & Young V. Morris; National Labor Relations Board V. Murphy Oil. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2017
Epic Systems Co. v. Lewis; Ernst & Young v. Morris; National Labor Relations Board v. Murphy Oil

Racial Justice

+3 桃子视频

Epic Systems Co. v. Lewis; Ernst & Young v. Morris; National Labor Relations Board v. Murphy Oil

Whether employment agreements that prevent workers from taking 鈥渃oncerted鈥 action to challenge workplace violations conflict with protections in federal labor law.
Epic Systems Co. V. Lewis; Ernst & Young V. Morris; National Labor Relations Board V. Murphy Oil. Explore Case.
North Carolina v. Robinson
North Carolina
May 2017

Racial Justice

+2 桃子视频

North Carolina v. Robinson

A North Carolina judge found intentional and systemic discrimination by state prosecutors against African-American potential jurors in capital cases and commuted the sentence of death-row prisoner Marcus Robinson to life in prison without the possibility of parole in April 2012. The decision is currently under appeal.
Explore case
North Carolina V. Robinson. Explore Case.
North Carolina
May 2017
North Carolina v. Robinson

Racial Justice

+2 桃子视频

North Carolina v. Robinson

A North Carolina judge found intentional and systemic discrimination by state prosecutors against African-American potential jurors in capital cases and commuted the sentence of death-row prisoner Marcus Robinson to life in prison without the possibility of parole in April 2012. The decision is currently under appeal.
North Carolina V. Robinson. Explore Case.
Adkins et al. vs. Morgan Stanley
Court Case
Mar 2017

Racial Justice

Adkins et al. vs. Morgan Stanley

The ACLU, along with the National Consumer Law Center and the law firm of Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, has filed a lawsuit in federal district court in Manhattan to hold Morgan Stanley accountable for its collaboration with the subprime lender New Century, which supplied Morgan Stanley with a steady stream of irresponsible, high-risk loans issued in communities of color that were particularly vulnerable to economic ruin. Although practices like these inflicted damages in low and middle-income communities across the nation, Detroit was particularly vulnerable.
Explore case
Adkins Et Al. Vs. Morgan Stanley. Explore Case.
Court Case
Mar 2017
Adkins et al. vs. Morgan Stanley

Racial Justice

Adkins et al. vs. Morgan Stanley

The ACLU, along with the National Consumer Law Center and the law firm of Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, has filed a lawsuit in federal district court in Manhattan to hold Morgan Stanley accountable for its collaboration with the subprime lender New Century, which supplied Morgan Stanley with a steady stream of irresponsible, high-risk loans issued in communities of color that were particularly vulnerable to economic ruin. Although practices like these inflicted damages in low and middle-income communities across the nation, Detroit was particularly vulnerable.
Adkins Et Al. Vs. Morgan Stanley. Explore Case.
Pe帽a-Rodriguez v. State of Colorado
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2017

Racial Justice

Criminal Law Reform

Pe帽a-Rodriguez v. State of Colorado

Whether a court may consider evidence of racially discriminatory comments during jury deliberations in deciding whether to grant a new trial.
Explore case
Pe帽a-rodriguez V. State Of Colorado. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2017
Pe帽a-Rodriguez v. State of Colorado

Racial Justice

Criminal Law Reform

Pe帽a-Rodriguez v. State of Colorado

Whether a court may consider evidence of racially discriminatory comments during jury deliberations in deciding whether to grant a new trial.
Pe帽a-rodriguez V. State Of Colorado. Explore Case.
910
11
1213...