Mass Incarceration

All Cases

158 Mass Incarceration Cases

Flores-Villar v. United States
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2011

Mass Incarceration

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Flores-Villar v. United States

Whether the government may constitutionally make it more difficult for citizen fathers than citizen mothers to transmit citizenship to their out-of-wedlock children born outside the U.S.
Explore case
Flores-villar V. United States. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2011
Flores-Villar v. United States

Mass Incarceration

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Flores-Villar v. United States

Whether the government may constitutionally make it more difficult for citizen fathers than citizen mothers to transmit citizenship to their out-of-wedlock children born outside the U.S.
Flores-villar V. United States. Explore Case.
Capital Punishment
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2011

Mass Incarceration

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Maples v. Thomas

Whether the defendant's failure to file a timely appeal in state court should bar all subsequent federal court review of his death sentence when the reason for the missed deadline was that Alabama officials made no effort to inform him of an adverse decision from the state courts after it was returned unopened by his lawyers' former law firm.
Explore case
Maples V. Thomas. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2011
Capital Punishment

Mass Incarceration

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Maples v. Thomas

Whether the defendant's failure to file a timely appeal in state court should bar all subsequent federal court review of his death sentence when the reason for the missed deadline was that Alabama officials made no effort to inform him of an adverse decision from the state courts after it was returned unopened by his lawyers' former law firm.
Maples V. Thomas. Explore Case.
Brown v. Plata
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2011

Mass Incarceration

Prisoners' Rights

Brown v. Plata

Whether a federal court appropriately exercised its authority by ordering the State of California to reduce the size of its prison population, which was more than double the system’s intended capacity, after dozens of remedial orders had failed for more than a decade to ensure that California prisoners received constitutionally adequate medical and mental health care.
Explore case
Brown V. Plata. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2011
Brown v. Plata

Mass Incarceration

Prisoners' Rights

Brown v. Plata

Whether a federal court appropriately exercised its authority by ordering the State of California to reduce the size of its prison population, which was more than double the system’s intended capacity, after dozens of remedial orders had failed for more than a decade to ensure that California prisoners received constitutionally adequate medical and mental health care.
Brown V. Plata. Explore Case.
Coble v. Texas
Court Case
May 2011

Mass Incarceration

Capital Punishment

Coble v. Texas

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµhas filed a petition for certiorari in the United States Supreme Court on behalf of Billie Wayne Coble. Mr. Coble served on Texas's death row for 18 years between his first and second capital trials. During these 18 years he proved to be a model inmate. He was never once issued a violation notice - a rare feat in prison. He was a positive role model to other inmates and consistently helped other inmates and prison guards.
Explore case
Coble V. Texas. Explore Case.
Court Case
May 2011
Coble v. Texas

Mass Incarceration

Capital Punishment

Coble v. Texas

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµhas filed a petition for certiorari in the United States Supreme Court on behalf of Billie Wayne Coble. Mr. Coble served on Texas's death row for 18 years between his first and second capital trials. During these 18 years he proved to be a model inmate. He was never once issued a violation notice - a rare feat in prison. He was a positive role model to other inmates and consistently helped other inmates and prison guards.
Coble V. Texas. Explore Case.
Estrada v. The State of Texas
Texas
Apr 2011

Mass Incarceration

Capital Punishment

Estrada v. The State of Texas

Jurors in Estrada's 2007 sentencing trial were incorrectly told by a State's prison expert that if Estrada were given a sentence of life without parole instead of the death penalty, he could be eligible for a classification level that would allow him to leave the prison grounds after 10 years of imprisonment. Two juror notes strongly suggested that the expert's false testimony led to their decision to sentence Estrada to death. Prosecutors' use of false and misleading evidence is a leading cause of wrongful death sentences in Texas and nationwide.
Explore case
Estrada V. The State Of Texas. Explore Case.
Texas
Apr 2011
Estrada v. The State of Texas

Mass Incarceration

Capital Punishment

Estrada v. The State of Texas

Jurors in Estrada's 2007 sentencing trial were incorrectly told by a State's prison expert that if Estrada were given a sentence of life without parole instead of the death penalty, he could be eligible for a classification level that would allow him to leave the prison grounds after 10 years of imprisonment. Two juror notes strongly suggested that the expert's false testimony led to their decision to sentence Estrada to death. Prosecutors' use of false and misleading evidence is a leading cause of wrongful death sentences in Texas and nationwide.
Estrada V. The State Of Texas. Explore Case.
89
10
1112...