LGBTQ Rights

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2020
Aimee Stephens in front of the Supreme Court

LGBTQ Rights

R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes v EEOC & Aimee Stephens

Aimee Stephens had worked for nearly six years as a funeral director at R.G. and G.R. Harris Funeral Homes when she informed the funeral home’s owner that she is a transgender woman. She was fired, the EEOC sued on her behalf, and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Aimee’s employer engaged in unlawful sex discrimination when it fired her because she’s transgender. We represented Aimee Stephens in front of the U.S. Supreme Court — and won.
R.g. & G.r. Harris Funeral Homes V Eeoc & Aimee Stephens. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2019
Don Zarda, Melissa Zarda, Bill Moore

LGBTQ Rights

Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda

Don Zarda loved to skydive. He worked as a skydiving instructor at Altitude Express, a company on Long Island, N.Y. He was fired for being gay.
Altitude Express Inc. V. Zarda. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2018
David Mullins and Charlie Craig

LGBTQ Rights

Religious Liberty

Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission

Whether a business open to the public has a constitutional right to discriminate.
Masterpiece Cakeshop V. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2015
Jim Obergefell

LGBTQ Rights

Obergefell, et al. v. Hodges - Freedom to Marry in Ohio

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Ohio and Alphonse Gerhardstein of Gerhardstein & Branch have filed suit on behalf of Jim Obergefell and David Michener, two widowers, and Robert Grunn, a funeral director, in a challenge to the Ohio constitutional and statutory marriage recognition bans.
Obergefell, Et Al. V. Hodges - Freedom To Marry In Ohio. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2015
Bourke Family

LGBTQ Rights

Bourke v. Beshear & Love v. Beshear - Freedom to Marry in Kentucky

Bourke v. Beshear is a federal court challenge to Kentucky's constitutional ban on marriage for same-sex couples, filed by attorneys at Clay Daniel Walton & Adams and Fauver Law Office on July 26, 2013, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. The plaintiffs are four same-sex couples seeking state recognition of their out-of-state marriages.
Bourke V. Beshear & Love V. Beshear - Freedom To Marry In Kentucky. Explore Case.

All Cases

190 LGBTQ Rights Cases

Wetherell v. Alaska Airlines
Washington
Oct 2023

LGBTQ Rights

Wetherell v. Alaska Airlines

Justin Wetherell is a nonbinary flight attendant and flight attendant instructor at Alaska Airlines. As a flight attendant, they have been required to comply with Alaska Airlines’ uniform and grooming policies that are grounded in outdated sex stereotypes and conflict with Justin’s nonbinary gender identity and fluid gender expression. Now Justin and the Washington State Human Rights Commission are fighting to ensure that Alaska Airlines’ uniform and grooming policy complies with the Washington State Law Against Discrimination and permits all employees to dress and groom in a professional manner that is consistent with their gender identity and expression.
Explore case
Wetherell V. Alaska Airlines. Explore Case.
Washington
Oct 2023
Wetherell v. Alaska Airlines

LGBTQ Rights

Wetherell v. Alaska Airlines

Justin Wetherell is a nonbinary flight attendant and flight attendant instructor at Alaska Airlines. As a flight attendant, they have been required to comply with Alaska Airlines’ uniform and grooming policies that are grounded in outdated sex stereotypes and conflict with Justin’s nonbinary gender identity and fluid gender expression. Now Justin and the Washington State Human Rights Commission are fighting to ensure that Alaska Airlines’ uniform and grooming policy complies with the Washington State Law Against Discrimination and permits all employees to dress and groom in a professional manner that is consistent with their gender identity and expression.
Wetherell V. Alaska Airlines. Explore Case.
Demonstrators outside the Supreme Court carrying signs advocating for LGBTQ rights
Court Case
Jul 2023

LGBTQ Rights

Doe v. Madison Metropolitan School District

In February 2020, several parents anonymously sued the Madison Metropolitan School District in Wisconsin state court. The parents claim that the school district’s guidance that seeks to provide support for transgender, non-binary, and gender-expansive students violates parental rights by allowing students to use names and pronouns at school different from those they were assigned at birth, without providing parental notification absent a student’s consent. The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµand ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Wisconsin intervened in the case on behalf of LGBTQ student groups at schools in the district to help defend the district’s guidance.
Explore case
Doe V. Madison Metropolitan School District. Explore Case.
Court Case
Jul 2023
Demonstrators outside the Supreme Court carrying signs advocating for LGBTQ rights

LGBTQ Rights

Doe v. Madison Metropolitan School District

In February 2020, several parents anonymously sued the Madison Metropolitan School District in Wisconsin state court. The parents claim that the school district’s guidance that seeks to provide support for transgender, non-binary, and gender-expansive students violates parental rights by allowing students to use names and pronouns at school different from those they were assigned at birth, without providing parental notification absent a student’s consent. The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµand ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Wisconsin intervened in the case on behalf of LGBTQ student groups at schools in the district to help defend the district’s guidance.
Doe V. Madison Metropolitan School District. Explore Case.
Revelers at an LGBTQ Pride parade
Utah
Jun 2023

LGBTQ Rights

Free Speech

Southern Utah Drag Stars, LLC v. City of St. George

This case is about whether a city government’s selective and discriminatory refusal to permit a family-friendly drag event in a public park violated the event organizers’ First Amendment right to free speech and the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection, and related provisions contained in the Utah Constitution.
Explore case
Southern Utah Drag Stars, Llc V. City Of St. George. Explore Case.
Utah
Jun 2023
Revelers at an LGBTQ Pride parade

LGBTQ Rights

Free Speech

Southern Utah Drag Stars, LLC v. City of St. George

This case is about whether a city government’s selective and discriminatory refusal to permit a family-friendly drag event in a public park violated the event organizers’ First Amendment right to free speech and the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection, and related provisions contained in the Utah Constitution.
Southern Utah Drag Stars, Llc V. City Of St. George. Explore Case.
Aiden Vasquez and Mika Covington.
Court Case
Jun 2023

LGBTQ Rights

Vasquez v. Iowa Department of Human Services

On May 31st, 2019, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Iowa and National ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµLGBTQ and HIV Project filed a lawsuit to block implementation of an Iowa law that was recently passed to restore the ban on Medicaid coverage for essential, gender-affirming surgery to transgender Iowans that the Iowa Supreme recently struck down.
Explore case
Vasquez V. Iowa Department Of Human Services. Explore Case.
Court Case
Jun 2023
Aiden Vasquez and Mika Covington.

LGBTQ Rights

Vasquez v. Iowa Department of Human Services

On May 31st, 2019, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Iowa and National ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµLGBTQ and HIV Project filed a lawsuit to block implementation of an Iowa law that was recently passed to restore the ban on Medicaid coverage for essential, gender-affirming surgery to transgender Iowans that the Iowa Supreme recently struck down.
Vasquez V. Iowa Department Of Human Services. Explore Case.
Planned Parenthood of the Heartland v. Hilgers
Nebraska Supreme Court
May 2023

LGBTQ Rights

Reproductive Freedom

Planned Parenthood of the Heartland v. Hilgers

In May 2023, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ and the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Nebraska filed a lawsuit on behalf of Nebraska abortion providers and their patients challenging a state law that bans physicians from providing abortion after 12 weeks of pregnancy and that, as of October 2023, will restrict health care available to trans youth. The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµhas asked a state court in Nebraska to enter an emergency order blocking the law’s enforcement. The Court ruled that the two halves of L.B. 574 fall within the single subject of regulating health care, and thus the Court held that L.B. 574 does not violate the single-subject rule. Consequently, the abortion ban and gender-affirming care restrictions in L.B. 574 remain in effect. However, the Court did reject the state’s argument that the single-subject is a nonjusticiable political question.
Explore case
Planned Parenthood Of The Heartland V. Hilgers. Explore Case.
Nebraska Supreme Court
May 2023
Planned Parenthood of the Heartland v. Hilgers

LGBTQ Rights

Reproductive Freedom

Planned Parenthood of the Heartland v. Hilgers

In May 2023, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ and the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Nebraska filed a lawsuit on behalf of Nebraska abortion providers and their patients challenging a state law that bans physicians from providing abortion after 12 weeks of pregnancy and that, as of October 2023, will restrict health care available to trans youth. The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµhas asked a state court in Nebraska to enter an emergency order blocking the law’s enforcement. The Court ruled that the two halves of L.B. 574 fall within the single subject of regulating health care, and thus the Court held that L.B. 574 does not violate the single-subject rule. Consequently, the abortion ban and gender-affirming care restrictions in L.B. 574 remain in effect. However, the Court did reject the state’s argument that the single-subject is a nonjusticiable political question.
Planned Parenthood Of The Heartland V. Hilgers. Explore Case.
89
10
1112...