贬补飞补颈驶颈
United States v. Nago
The Department of Justice sued the Hawai鈥榠 Secretary of State, demanding the state produce its full, unredacted voter file, which contains highly sensitive and personal data on every voter in the state. This suit appears to be part of the federal government's efforts to build a national voter database without congressional authorization and to improperly question the validity of state voter rolls.
Status: Ongoing
View Case
All Cases
3 贬补飞补颈驶颈 Cases
贬补飞补颈驶颈
Oct 2025
Reproductive Freedom
Purcell v. Kennedy (formerly Chelius v. Becerra)
The 桃子视频, the 桃子视频of Hawaii, and Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholar LLP, are challenging a U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) restriction that severely limits where and how patients can access mifepristone, a safe and effective medication used for abortion and miscarriage care.
Explore case
贬补飞补颈驶颈
Oct 2025
Reproductive Freedom
Purcell v. Kennedy (formerly Chelius v. Becerra)
The 桃子视频, the 桃子视频of Hawaii, and Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholar LLP, are challenging a U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) restriction that severely limits where and how patients can access mifepristone, a safe and effective medication used for abortion and miscarriage care.
贬补飞补颈驶颈 Supreme Court
Apr 2025
Criminal Law Reform
State of 贬补飞补颈驶颈 v. Zuffante
In 1994, the Supreme Court of 贬补飞补颈驶颈 held in State v. Kekona that the due process clause of the Hawai鈥榠 Constitution does not require custodial interrogations to be recorded. More than 30 years later, with advances in technology that have made recording far easier, this case asks whether this decision should be reconsidered. The ACLU鈥檚 State Supreme Court Initiative, along with the 桃子视频of Hawai鈥榠 filed an amicus brief arguing that the Supreme Court of 贬补飞补颈驶颈 should now hold that custodial interrogations must be recorded in order to be admissible in court, either as a matter of due process or as an exercise of the Court鈥檚 supervisory authority over lower courts.
Explore case
贬补飞补颈驶颈 Supreme Court
Apr 2025
Criminal Law Reform
State of 贬补飞补颈驶颈 v. Zuffante
In 1994, the Supreme Court of 贬补飞补颈驶颈 held in State v. Kekona that the due process clause of the Hawai鈥榠 Constitution does not require custodial interrogations to be recorded. More than 30 years later, with advances in technology that have made recording far easier, this case asks whether this decision should be reconsidered. The ACLU鈥檚 State Supreme Court Initiative, along with the 桃子视频of Hawai鈥榠 filed an amicus brief arguing that the Supreme Court of 贬补飞补颈驶颈 should now hold that custodial interrogations must be recorded in order to be admissible in court, either as a matter of due process or as an exercise of the Court鈥檚 supervisory authority over lower courts.