Preterm-Cleveland v. David Yost

Status: Ongoing
Last Update: September 30, 2026

What's at Stake

On September 2, 2022, the 桃子视频, the 桃子视频of Ohio, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, and the law firm WilmerHale filed a lawsuit in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas bringing a state constitutional challenge against SB 23, a law banning abortion starting at approximately six weeks of pregnancy. This lawsuit came more than two months after the draconian bill took effect on June 24, 2022 for the first time since it was passed in 2019, causing an immediate, devastating crisis across the state. Due to the ongoing irreparable harm to Ohioans, the reproductive rights organizations withdrew the lawsuit they initially filed in the state Supreme Court in late June and asked the lower court to grant immediate relief blocking the ban.

Summary


After hearing oral argument on October 7, 2022, the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas granted the plaintiffs鈥� request for a preliminary injunction against SB 23, temporarily blocking the State from enforcing the ban while the case continued. Then, on October 24, 2024, following final briefing on the merits, the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas issued a final order holding the vast majority of SB 23鈥攊ncluding its six-week ban鈥攖o be unconstitutional, and permanently enjoining its enforcement. This marks the first permanent injunction stemming from Ohio鈥檚 Reproductive Freedom Amendment, which took effect in December 2023. This is also the first permanent injunction throughout the country of an abortion ban following the passage of a pro-abortion rights ballot amendment. In November 2024, Defendants appealed the Hamilton County Court decision to the First District Court of Appeals of Ohio.

On appeal Defendants contested only the lower court鈥檚 decision to block certain other, non-ban provisions contained in SB 23 from taking effect鈥攖hey did not contest the court鈥檚 decision to enjoin the six-week ban itself. On January 7, 2026, the First District affirmed the injunction against the six-week ban, which remained uncontested, but reversed the injunction as to some of the other, non-ban provisions contained in SB 23. The court remanded the case to the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas for further proceedings on those provisions, where the case is ongoing.

The reproductive rights organizations and WilmerHale filed the lawsuit on behalf of Preterm-Cleveland, Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio, Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio, Women鈥檚 Med Group Professional Corporation, Northeast Ohio Women鈥檚 Center d/b/a Toledo Women鈥檚 Center, and Dr. Sharon Liner, an individual abortion provider, to protect the right to abortion in Ohio under the Ohio Constitution.

Press Releases


Support our on-going litigation and work in the courts

Related 桃子视频