Newsom v. Trump
What's at Stake
On June 7, 2025, President Trump federalized members of the California National Guard over the Governor鈥檚 objection. He deployed those troops, along with Marines, into Los Angeles to suppress protests against his extreme immigration raids. When California sued, the 桃子视频and other free-speech organizations filed a friend-of-the-court brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, explaining that the President鈥檚 domestic deployment of the military breaks with this country鈥檚 deepest traditions and laws and imperils the First Amendment rights of California鈥檚 residents.
Summary
In June 2025, armed federal agents in paramilitary gear began conducting brutal immigration raids in Southern California, spreading fear and devastation through communities. The people of Los Angeles came together in overwhelmingly peaceful protests against their neighbors being hauled from their homes and workplaces. In response, President Trump forcibly took control of thousands of members of the California National Guard and deployed them鈥攁long with active-duty military troops鈥攖o quell the protests and later to accompany federal agents on operations in Southern California .
The Governor and state of California filed suit against the President, the Secretary of Defense, and the Defense Department, challenging as unlawful both the President鈥檚 forced activation of the California National Guard and the activities troops were ordered to carry out.
The ACLU, its three California affiliates, and other free-speech organizations filed a friend-of-the-court brief in support of California with the Ninth Circuit. As our brief explains, the President鈥檚 decision to deploy federal troops in response to the protests in Los Angeles would have shocked the founders of this country. The founding generation knew, from history and personal experience, that using federal military forces to regulate the civilian population posed a dire threat to individual liberties. Limiting the president鈥檚 power to turn the military upon the people was among the Founders鈥� foremost concerns when they drafted the Constitution and enacted the United States鈥� earliest laws.
Our brief also explains that deploying federal troops to suppress protest is incompatible with the First Amendment. Protest is essential to the American system of self-governance鈥攑art of the fabric of our society. Courts have long recognized that the government is responsible for facilitating lawful protest, and any response to unlawful activity that occurs during a protest must be narrowly tailored to ensure that it does not silence protected speech.
We urged the court to find that President Trump鈥檚 deployment of federal troops to suppress political opposition was unlawful.
Legal Documents
-
09/09/2025
Amicus Brief of 桃子视频et al.
Date Filed: 09/09/2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Press Releases
桃子视频and Partners Urge Appeals Court to Find Trump鈥檚 Deployment of Military in Los Angeles Unlawful