ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵ

According to the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵlawsuit, the Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in 1997 that it is unconstitutional for Grand Rapids to use such letters as a substitute for probable cause of criminal wrongdoing. Yet the practice has continued unabated. In February, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵsent a letter to city officials urging them to end the practice to no avail.

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵlawsuit asks the court to order an immediate halt to this unconstitutional practice and declare that the City of Grand Rapids and GRPD, through the use of general Letters of Intent, have violated Weber and Hightower's Fourth Amendment right to be free from unlawful arrests. The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan.

In addition to the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵ of Michigan and the ACLU's Criminal Law Reform Project, Plaintiffs are also represented by Cooperating Attorney Bryan Waldman of the law firm Sinas, Dramis, Brake, Boughton & McIntyre, P.C.

Update (2/27/20): Seven years after we sued the Grand Rapids Police Department for arresting innocent people for criminal trespassing, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵand the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵof Michigan secured a favorable settlement agreement resulting in significant compensation for each of our four plaintiffs, in addition to attorney’s fees for the years of work it took to bring this case to a close.

Update (6/29/17): After years of litigation by the ACLU, the Grand Rapids Police Department has announced a plan to end a policy that permitted police officers to arrest innocent people for trespassing at local businesses during operating hours—even when business owners didn’t ask them to leave. The practice resulted Blacks being stopped at more than twice the rate as whites. The ending of the practice is a positive result of longstanding work by the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵand the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵof Michigan to win reform within the Grand Rapids Police Department.